"BREAKING NEWS" Federal law says you "CAN" opt out of Obamacare and "CAN NOT" be penalized! | |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 12:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Drunk Uncle
User ID: 49155171 United States 01/10/2014 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 12:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Amazing that nobody has found this, or brought it up yet. JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 12:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If this is true we need to open the book on this one everybody. JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am going to sleep now, hopefully in the morning we will have more discussion. Good night all :) JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52736592 United States 01/10/2014 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Interested_1
User ID: 30318195 United States 01/10/2014 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just want to get your opinions on whether or not this is true. If it is, that would be totally awesome. Quoting: Gdchappy [link to youtu.be] Here are the links to the sources- [link to dcclothesline.com] [link to www.law.cornell.edu] [link to go] away/opinion-conservative/2014/01/federal-law-says-you-can-opt-out-of-obamacare-nor-can-you-be-penalized-if-you-do-2786280.html [link to fellowshipoftheminds.com] From the Cornell site reads: No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. but I think is supposed to be read like: No (individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer) offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. Basically none of those entities in the parentheses that offer insurance will not be penalized for not participating. Sadly, I don't think they're referring to individual citizens. But I'm not a lawyer, so who knows. Because I *am* a finder of loopholes and I could *easily* read it the way you posted. Take the red pill now...later it will come as a suppository. |
snark
Forum Administrator User ID: 14611344 United States 01/10/2014 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just want to get your opinions on whether or not this is true. If it is, that would be totally awesome. Quoting: Gdchappy [link to youtu.be] Here are the links to the sources- [link to dcclothesline.com] [link to www.law.cornell.edu] [link to go] away/opinion-conservative/2014/01/federal-law-says-you-can-opt-out-of-obamacare-nor-can-you-be-penalized-if-you-do-2786280.html [link to fellowshipoftheminds.com] From the Cornell site reads: No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. but I think is supposed to be read like: No (individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer) offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. Basically none of those entities in the parentheses that offer insurance will not be penalized for not participating. Sadly, I don't think they're referring to individual citizens. But I'm not a lawyer, so who knows. Because I *am* a finder of loopholes and I could *easily* read it the way you posted. I believe is correct, sadly. Raised by an attorney who was a professional loophole-finder. T For Texas, T For Tennessee! The virtue of courage is a prerequisite for the practice of all other virtues, because otherwise one is virtuous only when virtue has no cost. There are times when something needs to be done, and yet we know that if we step up and do this needful thing, we will pay a heavy personal price. -C.S. Lewis |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just want to get your opinions on whether or not this is true. If it is, that would be totally awesome. Quoting: Gdchappy [link to youtu.be] Here are the links to the sources- [link to dcclothesline.com] [link to www.law.cornell.edu] [link to go] away/opinion-conservative/2014/01/federal-law-says-you-can-opt-out-of-obamacare-nor-can-you-be-penalized-if-you-do-2786280.html [link to fellowshipoftheminds.com] From the Cornell site reads: No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. but I think is supposed to be read like: No (individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer) offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. Basically none of those entities in the parentheses that offer insurance will not be penalized for not participating. Sadly, I don't think they're referring to individual citizens. But I'm not a lawyer, so who knows. Because I *am* a finder of loopholes and I could *easily* read it the way you posted. I believe is correct, sadly. Raised by an attorney who was a professional loophole-finder. Well maybe your right, usually when something sounds too good to be true, it is. JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. |
Gdchappy
(OP) User ID: 46881836 United States 01/10/2014 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems like we the people, aren't getting too many breaks theses day's, doesn't it? JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. |
snark
Forum Administrator User ID: 14611344 United States 01/10/2014 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems like we the people, aren't getting too many breaks theses day's, doesn't it? Quoting: Gdchappy Nope. :( T For Texas, T For Tennessee! The virtue of courage is a prerequisite for the practice of all other virtues, because otherwise one is virtuous only when virtue has no cost. There are times when something needs to be done, and yet we know that if we step up and do this needful thing, we will pay a heavy personal price. -C.S. Lewis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2822082 United States 01/10/2014 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But it does not read correctly if the parenthesis are taken out. Parenthesis clarify a statement and are independent of the words of the rest of the sentence; therefore, when you take out the parenthesis and the words between them, the sentence should still be able to be read and be grammatically correct. This is what I remember, never made lower than a 90 in English classes. Perhaps someone else can chime in? |
snark
Forum Administrator User ID: 14611344 United States 01/10/2014 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "No offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act..." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2822082 But it does not read correctly if the parenthesis are taken out. Parenthesis clarify a statement and are independent of the words of the rest of the sentence; therefore, when you take out the parenthesis and the words between them, the sentence should still be able to be read and be grammatically correct. This is what I remember, never made lower than a 90 in English classes. Perhaps someone else can chime in? All I can say about that is many .gov docs I've read are grammatically horrible... T For Texas, T For Tennessee! The virtue of courage is a prerequisite for the practice of all other virtues, because otherwise one is virtuous only when virtue has no cost. There are times when something needs to be done, and yet we know that if we step up and do this needful thing, we will pay a heavy personal price. -C.S. Lewis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2822082 United States 01/10/2014 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
snark
Forum Administrator User ID: 14611344 United States 01/10/2014 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true, snark! Main reason I posted my reply was due to the Cornell sites title to the article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2822082 Freedom not to participate in Federal health insurance programs I do think this is referring to the freedom of an ISSUER, be they an individual or company, not to participate in the exchanges. Of course, even this freedom is limited, as any policy issued by an issuer must be compliant with Obamacare (this week at least lol) even if it isn't sold on the exchanges. T For Texas, T For Tennessee! The virtue of courage is a prerequisite for the practice of all other virtues, because otherwise one is virtuous only when virtue has no cost. There are times when something needs to be done, and yet we know that if we step up and do this needful thing, we will pay a heavy personal price. -C.S. Lewis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2822082 United States 01/10/2014 02:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And in a twist, if it is true, Obama did not violate the Constitution (this time). And when he said "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor", it was true, if no one is forced to be on the ACA. One must ask, why did the insurance companies cancel those millions of plans if they did not HAVE to offer plans with the minimum standards of the ACA? And they knew individuals did not have to go with the ACA? This would seem to be how some states did not do the medicaid expansion. Aren't states corporations? These are questions off the top of my head. Gonna have to think on this. And wait to see what others have to contribute to the thread! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2822082 United States 01/10/2014 02:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true, snark! Main reason I posted my reply was due to the Cornell sites title to the article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2822082 Freedom not to participate in Federal health insurance programs I do think this is referring to the freedom of an ISSUER, be they an individual or company, not to participate in the exchanges. Of course, even this freedom is limited, as any policy issued by an issuer must be compliant with Obamacare (this week at least lol) even if it isn't sold on the exchanges. I see what you are saying! |
Neptune Fabman
User ID: 15365559 United States 01/10/2014 07:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3771332 United States 01/10/2014 07:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Diluted
User ID: 46063120 United States 01/10/2014 07:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just caught the thread title, I'm driving using text type, will read when I get a chance this sounds juicy. Read my book that discusses everything from the hidden government to ET contact: [link to www.scribd.com] Love to GLP. |
Diluted
User ID: 46063120 United States 01/10/2014 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | okay just saw the first video that's awesome. now how do you invoke that when you file your taxes? Read my book that discusses everything from the hidden government to ET contact: [link to www.scribd.com] Love to GLP. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8996836 United States 01/10/2014 07:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just want to get your opinions on whether or not this is true. If it is, that would be totally awesome. Quoting: Gdchappy [link to youtu.be] Here are the links to the sources- [link to dcclothesline.com] [link to www.law.cornell.edu] [link to go] away/opinion-conservative/2014/01/federal-law-says-you-can-opt-out-of-obamacare-nor-can-you-be-penalized-if-you-do-2786280.html [link to fellowshipoftheminds.com] you rock bro, and this proves to all the crying nancys that CONTRACT LAW reigns SUPREME and they CANNOT WILL NOT EVER FUCK WITH THAT. |
talkstory
User ID: 52708011 Thailand 01/10/2014 07:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | posted yesterday with some lively debate Thread: BREAKING Federal law says you CAN opt out of Obamacare and CAN NOT be penalized! talkstory |
talkstory
User ID: 52708011 Thailand 01/10/2014 07:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I do not consent. Corporate laws only applies to employees of said corporation, are you an employee of the corp. Are you using federal reserve notes, if so, you are considered an agent of the corporation. For the law clearly states that federal reserve notes are to be used by agents and banks of the federal reserve and for no other purposes. Redeem your federal reserve notes for lawful money and be redeemed. Come out of her. talkstory |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8996836 United States 01/10/2014 07:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just want to get your opinions on whether or not this is true. If it is, that would be totally awesome. Quoting: Gdchappy [link to youtu.be] Here are the links to the sources- [link to dcclothesline.com] [link to www.law.cornell.edu] [link to go] away/opinion-conservative/2014/01/federal-law-says-you-can-opt-out-of-obamacare-nor-can-you-be-penalized-if-you-do-2786280.html [link to fellowshipoftheminds.com] From the Cornell site reads: No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. but I think is supposed to be read like: No (individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer) offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. Basically none of those entities in the parentheses that offer insurance will not be penalized for not participating. Sadly, I don't think they're referring to individual citizens. But I'm not a lawyer, so who knows. Because I *am* a finder of loopholes and I could *easily* read it the way you posted. :this1: I believe is correct, sadly. Raised by an attorney who was a professional loophole-finder. Well maybe your right, usually when something sounds too good to be true, it is. law is absolute and has to be written absolutely, it means exactly what it says. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8996836 United States 01/10/2014 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I do not consent. Corporate laws only applies to employees of said corporation, are you an employee of the corp. Quoting: talkstory Are you using federal reserve notes, if so, you are considered an agent of the corporation. For the law clearly states that federal reserve notes are to be used by agents and banks of the federal reserve and for no other purposes. Redeem your federal reserve notes for lawful money and be redeemed. Come out of her. = dumbbed down americans |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50342249 United States 01/10/2014 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Interested_1 From the Cornell site reads: No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. but I think is supposed to be read like: No (individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer) offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs. Basically none of those entities in the parentheses that offer insurance will not be penalized for not participating. Sadly, I don't think they're referring to individual citizens. But I'm not a lawyer, so who knows. Because I *am* a finder of loopholes and I could *easily* read it the way you posted. :this1: I believe is correct, sadly. Raised by an attorney who was a professional loophole-finder. Well maybe your right, usually when something sounds too good to be true, it is. law is absolute and has to be written absolutely, it means exactly what it says. "there shall be no penalty or fine imposed" Didnt scotus rule that the "penaly" is not a penalty but is actually a tax? That would be their loophole. |