ALERT! Andrews AFB sending out code on shortwave! Several EAM's today! | |
EscapeVelocity
User ID: 42028894 United States 06/24/2013 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wait i was a Marine Corps Radio Operator 2531 and i have no clue what you a chating about. what are you listening to in the first place? Quoting: usmcvet216 first thing we learn in comm school is never talk in the open (clear) so whatever chatter you hear is encrypted and you wont decipher it. and/or you are hearing background chatter from distant stations. over my years on many hours of radio watch you get alot of strange noises and pulses on HF. there are many reasons for this. they would never broadcast anything important over radio. especially the airforce. most things would be on the sipernet. almost 99% of orders military wise are communicated this way. and the foriegn languages are static or a distant station broadcasting somewhere else. are you a HAM operator even? just hearing all these i heard this and that on the radio i dont own; too many threads with people who have no clue. just because you found a CB at a garage sale or your dad/grandpas basement does not mean you are going to intercept military rado traffic. a real HAM operator would understand this my post from other thread. i call major BS on this Srike package codes, recalls, control info are to be sent to strategic bombers via satcom, but the redundant system is global shortwave and the use of a one time pad based system with other types of context based encryption mixed in. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] This is used in the event that milstar's packet sipernet is disabled.. To provide positive control of strategic nuclear assets from a wide range of installed locations, hardware configurations and even civilian transmitters provided you have the correct authentication. Even a full scale nuclear war would not terminate this fallback shortwave link. Last Edited by EscapeVelocity on 06/24/2013 03:51 AM "I know that the molecules in my body are traceable to phenomena in the cosmos. That makes me want to grab people on the street and say: 'Have you HEARD THIS?" -Neil deGrasse Tyson :fly_sail: If you hate my avatar.. you are going to love this.. [link to youtu.be] In Death members of Project Mayhem Have a name. His name is James M. Boyd. |
usmcvet216
User ID: 29867276 United States 06/24/2013 03:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | last post you maybe on the dot perfectly. this was a pre internet technology and i am sure we are not in a full scale war where the sipernet and satcoms are down. these might be standard radio checks. this would be boring, boring radio watch. here is a quote from the link provided to me and i needed to learn. this is all a just hearsay "Further detailed information can be found from the following sources: Hobby sources: Ary Boender's "Numbers & Oddities" column in the July 1995 (FOXTROT broadcasts) and August 1995 ("EAMs") WUN Newsletters (both newsletters are now "archived" at the WUN web site to save drive space - wunv1n7.zip and wunv1n8.zip) - a short overview of how these broadcasts 0manifest themselves on various HF frequencies. The December 1994 issue of Monitoring Times containing the "Utility World" column of Larry Van Horn, titled "US Air Force Global High Frequency (HF) System." A concise overview of the GHFS, and the traffic contained on the GHFS. The September 1995 issue of Monitoring Times containing the "Utility World" column of Larry Van Horn, titled "What's the meaning behind the messages." An overview of the "message" traffic heard on the GHFS and the NIGHTWATCH net. "The Aeronautical Communications Handbook - HF Edition" by Robert E. Evans; 1989 (and out of print, I believe); pages 7.11-7.13. Written while the Strategic Air Command was still in existence, so most of the information is out of date in it's details, but apparently not in it's overview of the EAMs. "Academic" sources: There are no known public sources for detailed descriptions of these strings, but there are a number of books and papers published that cover this topic in broad strokes (and, which I suspect are in many ways greatly out of date - I've found nothing that covers the post 1992 strategic world in a way that is as detailed as they cover the pre 1992 world. It may be too early to do so, as it is probably still in transition). Some examples follow: "The Logic of Accidental Nuclear War" by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1993 (still in print); ISBN 0-8157-0983-8 (paper). There are numerous additional sources listed within the extensive "notes" section of this book. The notes section also contains detailed information that covers the uses of these messages. "Strategic Command and Control - Redefining the Nuclear Threat by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1985 (still in print as of the middle of 1996); ISBN 0-8157-0982-X (hardbound). Much of this information covers what is now the foundation for today's strategic world, but I suspect that many of the specific details covered in the book are now greatly altered, maybe beyond recognition (such as the integration of the USN into much of the then SAC-centric activity in his book.) "Global Zero Alert for Nuclear Forces" by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1995 (May or so, and still in print); ISBN 0-8157-0941-2. The only "book" (it's actually an "occasional paper" of 108 pages) in this group that can be said to be up-to-date in the post 1992 strategic world. On EAMs, in particular see pages 59-60. "Guarding the Guardians: Civilian Control of Nuclear Weapons in the United States" by Peter Douglas Feaver; Cornell University Press; 1992 (out of print unfortunately). Mostly covers PAL (Permissive Action Link) locks but has an overview on EAMs throughout the book. "Dark Sun - The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb" by Richard Rhodes; Simon and Schuster; 1995 (still in print); ISBN 0-684-80400-X. Page 573: "..SAC routinely transmitted DefCon increases as unclassified messages until 1972." Question: what happened after 1972? - "SAC routinely transmitted DefCon increases as classified messages"? The 10 May 1976 issue of "Aviation Week and Space Technology", devoted almost entirely to the Strategic Air Command. Written during the "Alpha Net" days of OFFUTT/BARKSDALE/WESTOVER/MARCH but has information that might still apply in some aspects 20 years later (probably modified.) The Winter 1996 (Volume 27) issue of "World Air Power Journal" devoted to the B-52H with a long article beginning on page 54 written by Robert F. Dorr and Brian C. Rogers. See page 89 for a description of the receipt and authentication of an emergency war order onboard an airborne B-52H. Fiction "The Hunt for Red October" by Tom Clancy; Naval Institute Press; 1984 (still in print); ISBN 0-87021-285-0. Pages 65-66 (hardcover) for EAM information; and page 68 (hardcover) for "traffic analysis" fans. "Arc Light" by Eric L. Harry; Simon and Schuster (his editor was also Rhodes' editor on "Dark Sun"); 1994 (Aug); ISBN 0-671-88048-9. The author gets to engage the Midnight Express (see the "Logic..." book) and run his SIOP, in a probable pre-92 way though. 04 April 2005 update to information published on 02 September 1998 and 30 March 2005 Jeff Haverlah" [link to www.monitoringtimes.com] so please dont tell me to learn. this is not fact. you are wasting your time looking for a boogie man on the radio. so what does this chatter mean? you obviously know the most about it member in a argumentive tone with me? |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Speaking of argumentative tone, did you READ your post??? Tons of insults. Last Edited by Tangy on 06/24/2013 04:03 AM |
EscapeVelocity
User ID: 42028894 United States 06/24/2013 04:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | last post you maybe on the dot perfectly. this was a pre internet technology and i am sure we are not in a full scale war where the sipernet and satcoms are down. Quoting: usmcvet216 these might be standard radio checks. this would be boring, boring radio watch. here is a quote from the link provided to me and i needed to learn. this is all a just hearsay "Further detailed information can be found from the following sources: Hobby sources: Ary Boender's "Numbers & Oddities" column in the July 1995 (FOXTROT broadcasts) and August 1995 ("EAMs") WUN Newsletters (both newsletters are now "archived" at the WUN web site to save drive space - wunv1n7.zip and wunv1n8.zip) - a short overview of how these broadcasts 0manifest themselves on various HF frequencies. The December 1994 issue of Monitoring Times containing the "Utility World" column of Larry Van Horn, titled "US Air Force Global High Frequency (HF) System." A concise overview of the GHFS, and the traffic contained on the GHFS. The September 1995 issue of Monitoring Times containing the "Utility World" column of Larry Van Horn, titled "What's the meaning behind the messages." An overview of the "message" traffic heard on the GHFS and the NIGHTWATCH net. "The Aeronautical Communications Handbook - HF Edition" by Robert E. Evans; 1989 (and out of print, I believe); pages 7.11-7.13. Written while the Strategic Air Command was still in existence, so most of the information is out of date in it's details, but apparently not in it's overview of the EAMs. "Academic" sources: There are no known public sources for detailed descriptions of these strings, but there are a number of books and papers published that cover this topic in broad strokes (and, which I suspect are in many ways greatly out of date - I've found nothing that covers the post 1992 strategic world in a way that is as detailed as they cover the pre 1992 world. It may be too early to do so, as it is probably still in transition). Some examples follow: "The Logic of Accidental Nuclear War" by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1993 (still in print); ISBN 0-8157-0983-8 (paper). There are numerous additional sources listed within the extensive "notes" section of this book. The notes section also contains detailed information that covers the uses of these messages. "Strategic Command and Control - Redefining the Nuclear Threat by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1985 (still in print as of the middle of 1996); ISBN 0-8157-0982-X (hardbound). Much of this information covers what is now the foundation for today's strategic world, but I suspect that many of the specific details covered in the book are now greatly altered, maybe beyond recognition (such as the integration of the USN into much of the then SAC-centric activity in his book.) "Global Zero Alert for Nuclear Forces" by Bruce G. Blair; The Brookings Institution; 1995 (May or so, and still in print); ISBN 0-8157-0941-2. The only "book" (it's actually an "occasional paper" of 108 pages) in this group that can be said to be up-to-date in the post 1992 strategic world. On EAMs, in particular see pages 59-60. "Guarding the Guardians: Civilian Control of Nuclear Weapons in the United States" by Peter Douglas Feaver; Cornell University Press; 1992 (out of print unfortunately). Mostly covers PAL (Permissive Action Link) locks but has an overview on EAMs throughout the book. "Dark Sun - The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb" by Richard Rhodes; Simon and Schuster; 1995 (still in print); ISBN 0-684-80400-X. Page 573: "..SAC routinely transmitted DefCon increases as unclassified messages until 1972." Question: what happened after 1972? - "SAC routinely transmitted DefCon increases as classified messages"? The 10 May 1976 issue of "Aviation Week and Space Technology", devoted almost entirely to the Strategic Air Command. Written during the "Alpha Net" days of OFFUTT/BARKSDALE/WESTOVER/MARCH but has information that might still apply in some aspects 20 years later (probably modified.) The Winter 1996 (Volume 27) issue of "World Air Power Journal" devoted to the B-52H with a long article beginning on page 54 written by Robert F. Dorr and Brian C. Rogers. See page 89 for a description of the receipt and authentication of an emergency war order onboard an airborne B-52H. Fiction "The Hunt for Red October" by Tom Clancy; Naval Institute Press; 1984 (still in print); ISBN 0-87021-285-0. Pages 65-66 (hardcover) for EAM information; and page 68 (hardcover) for "traffic analysis" fans. "Arc Light" by Eric L. Harry; Simon and Schuster (his editor was also Rhodes' editor on "Dark Sun"); 1994 (Aug); ISBN 0-671-88048-9. The author gets to engage the Midnight Express (see the "Logic..." book) and run his SIOP, in a probable pre-92 way though. 04 April 2005 update to information published on 02 September 1998 and 30 March 2005 Jeff Haverlah" [link to www.monitoringtimes.com] so please dont tell me to learn. this is not fact. you are wasting your time looking for a boogie man on the radio. so what does this chatter mean? you obviously know the most about it member in a argumentive tone with me? Yes, you are both correct.. Satcom (milstar) first, then shortwave and / or VLF from the NAVY retransmitting EAM from the NCA. [link to en.wikipedia.org] I suspect we have somthing similar, but the Russians have a third fall back.. A missile that flies an arc trajectory over Russia transmitting launch orders from a radio in the missiles payload, down to all terrestrial and air launched rocket forces.. So the entire war can be kicked off with a single missile. This works even after multiple command and control hardened bunkers and all senior leadership are eliminated. Crazy shit.. Like a nuclear dead-mans-switch. Last Edited by EscapeVelocity on 06/24/2013 04:12 AM "I know that the molecules in my body are traceable to phenomena in the cosmos. That makes me want to grab people on the street and say: 'Have you HEARD THIS?" -Neil deGrasse Tyson :fly_sail: If you hate my avatar.. you are going to love this.. [link to youtu.be] In Death members of Project Mayhem Have a name. His name is James M. Boyd. |
usmcvet216
User ID: 29867276 United States 06/24/2013 04:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You called it all BS, role playing, white noise. You didn't even bother to look into it. You just went full retard about it. Quoting: Tangy Boring as it is, there are TONS of people listening to them. It is rather addicting. But NOT BS. does this same topic need 2 threads? with the same posters calling anyone who disagrees a shill? i dont doubt you hear something. it is from other sources, you guys talk about hearing differing things on the freq. i explained my job in the Marine Corps and standard radio conduct and talking in the open. this is from 1992. you dont think the military communiques different after the internet? you may be hearing a radio check or like i said communication with planes. i am not insulting anyone. just making a big deal about something you say yourself is encoded is silly to me. i asked questions and i get a homemade websites link and told to shut up and learn something like i dont know a thing about this topic. this was the tone i was talking about. basements/attics is where old gear is kept. very few HAM operators out there with new equipment these days. i want you to tell me why i got blasted for stating FACTS based on my EXPERIANCE? this is usaully a tactic used by trolls. please let me know some of the answers instead of the you didnt read the thread and here are 2 homemade links with their references made up out of mostly fiction books. Do you think this traffic really has anything consequencial? i dont bust on hobbies but when you are crying wolf on a thread; expect some people to question it. i am not a sheep and i will not just assume any post is correct because the OP says so. |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You called it all BS, role playing, white noise. You didn't even bother to look into it. You just went full retard about it. Quoting: Tangy Boring as it is, there are TONS of people listening to them. It is rather addicting. But NOT BS. does this same topic need 2 threads? with the same posters calling anyone who disagrees a shill? i dont doubt you hear something. it is from other sources, you guys talk about hearing differing things on the freq. i explained my job in the Marine Corps and standard radio conduct and talking in the open. this is from 1992. you dont think the military communiques different after the internet? you may be hearing a radio check or like i said communication with planes. i am not insulting anyone. just making a big deal about something you say yourself is encoded is silly to me. i asked questions and i get a homemade websites link and told to shut up and learn something like i dont know a thing about this topic. this was the tone i was talking about. basements/attics is where old gear is kept. very few HAM operators out there with new equipment these days. i want you to tell me why i got blasted for stating FACTS based on my EXPERIANCE? this is usaully a tactic used by trolls. please let me know some of the answers instead of the you didnt read the thread and here are 2 homemade links with their references made up out of mostly fiction books. Do you think this traffic really has anything consequencial? i dont bust on hobbies but when you are crying wolf on a thread; expect some people to question it. i am not a sheep and i will not just assume any post is correct because the OP says so. You were the one who posted the same message in both threads, so you tell me? |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dude, you really need to chill.. First off, this is a wide spread hobby, but like anything on GLP, someone will try and make it DOOMY. Your original post showed that you know nothing about EAMs and your subsequent posts just prove you don't care to understand it at all, just trash talk and assume. Not everyone thinks EAMS and SKYKINGS are the end of the world. I'm done explaining to you, there is someone else typing to you who has more patience for you... I don't. |
usmcvet216
User ID: 29867276 United States 06/24/2013 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you have not explained anything though. that is the thing. you cannot teach without explaining. i have asked the questions that you will not answer. i have responded to your inquiries. i posted a reply on both threads that were already started. i am asking why the need for 2 active threads for this? |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wait i was a Marine Corps Radio Operator 2531 and i have no clue what you a chating about. what are you listening to in the first place? Quoting: usmcvet216 first thing we learn in comm school is never talk in the open (clear) so whatever chatter you hear is encrypted and you wont decipher it. and/or you are hearing background chatter from distant stations. over my years on many hours of radio watch you get alot of strange noises and pulses on HF. there are many reasons for this. they would never broadcast anything important over radio. especially the airforce. most things would be on the sipernet. almost 99% of orders military wise are communicated this way. and the foriegn languages are static or a distant station broadcasting somewhere else. are you a HAM operator even? just hearing all these i heard this and that on the radio i dont own; too many threads with people who have no clue. just because you found a CB at a garage sale or your dad/grandpas basement does not mean you are going to intercept military rado traffic. a real HAM operator would understand this my post from other thread. i call major BS on this Last post in this thread was 6/5/13 until you bumped it with this. That is why the conversation is going in two threads. I am beginning to think maybe you are buzzed?? |
EscapeVelocity
User ID: 42028894 United States 06/24/2013 04:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yo.....did you guys copy that?? "I know that the molecules in my body are traceable to phenomena in the cosmos. That makes me want to grab people on the street and say: 'Have you HEARD THIS?" -Neil deGrasse Tyson :fly_sail: If you hate my avatar.. you are going to love this.. [link to youtu.be] In Death members of Project Mayhem Have a name. His name is James M. Boyd. |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 04:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | also encrypted means digitally encrypted. no one rights down code longhand and deciphers. what century are you in? Quoting: usmcvet216 one last thought. sometimes planes might talk in clear to runway control. can any of it be aircraft on the ground and their tail numbers are those? Maybe you should google before you try and look smart.. How the FUCK do you not know about this. lol..... As I said in response to your post in the other thread. READ THE THREAD. You might learn something. i am not trying to look smart. i have read the thread. and replied on the other one. so everything on google is correct? the one link provide could be your own webpage you are promoting. may i have others? when does the military talk on a open channel? i am not or claim to be a ham operator. i was a satcom field radio operator 2531 and then changed to 0621. i have training on HF, UHF, VHF and satcom. First thing you learn in comm school is never talk in the clear so explain the hand deciphered nuclear codes?? my experiance tells me this and everything written on that page relating to this goes against military radio protocol. can i have a link besides that. i have read the thread. Quoting: usmcvet216 why would they ever talk in the open? why put this out in the clear and open? explain who would have codes? why would this have chatter pick up before boston bombing? what is the point of your response? They have been doing it forever. One Pad Cypher google is your friend. :) [link to www.monitoringtimes.com] [link to www.ab9il.net] need more? anyone listening? i am hearing but cant make it out. how do i tune this KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Tangy Maybe you should google before you try and look smart.. How the FUCK do you not know about this. lol..... As I said in response to your post in the other thread. READ THE THREAD. You might learn something. i am not trying to look smart. i have read the thread. and replied on the other one. so everything on google is correct? the one link provide could be your own webpage you are promoting. may i have others? when does the military talk on a open channel? i am not or claim to be a ham operator. i was a satcom field radio operator 2531 and then changed to 0621. i have training on HF, UHF, VHF and satcom. First thing you learn in comm school is never talk in the clear so explain the hand deciphered nuclear codes?? my experiance tells me this and everything written on that page relating to this goes against military radio protocol. can i have a link besides that. i have read the thread. Quoting: usmcvet216 why would they ever talk in the open? why put this out in the clear and open? explain who would have codes? why would this have chatter pick up before boston bombing? what is the point of your response? They have been doing it forever. One Pad Cypher google is your friend. :) [link to www.monitoringtimes.com] [link to www.ab9il.net] need more? anyone listening? i am hearing but cant make it out. how do i tune this I'll pop in there and help you in the chat box at the bottom.. Give me a sec. :) |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: usmcvet216 i am not trying to look smart. i have read the thread. and replied on the other one. so everything on google is correct? the one link provide could be your own webpage you are promoting. may i have others? when does the military talk on a open channel? i am not or claim to be a ham operator. i was a satcom field radio operator 2531 and then changed to 0621. i have training on HF, UHF, VHF and satcom. First thing you learn in comm school is never talk in the clear so explain the hand deciphered nuclear codes?? my experiance tells me this and everything written on that page relating to this goes against military radio protocol. ... Quoting: Tangy They have been doing it forever. One Pad Cypher google is your friend. :) [link to www.monitoringtimes.com] [link to www.ab9il.net] need more? anyone listening? i am hearing but cant make it out. how do i tune this I'll pop in there and help you in the chat box at the bottom.. Give me a sec. :) thanks. usually don't get a reply when i post. i have been on this site forever and still dont know how to work half the stuff on it :) KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'll pop in there and help you in the chat box at the bottom.. Give me a sec. :) thanks. usually don't get a reply when i post. i have been on this site forever and still dont know how to work half the stuff on it :) Scroll down to the bottom of the scanner page, and find the chat box. I typed 8992usb in there, it is blue. Click that, and it will tune the scanner for you. I don't have java enabled on my other computer. Seeing if I do on this one. lol |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the Russians have a third fall back.. A missile that flies an arc trajectory over Russia transmitting launch orders from a radio in the missiles payload, down to all terrestrial and air launched rocket forces.. So the entire war can be kicked off with a single missile. This works even after multiple command and control hardened bunkers and all senior leadership are eliminated. Crazy shit.. Like a nuclear dead-mans-switch. Quoting: EscapeVelocity Yo.....did you guys copy that?? I did see that. |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 04:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thanks. usually don't get a reply when i post. i have been on this site forever and still dont know how to work half the stuff on it :) Scroll down to the bottom of the scanner page, and find the chat box. I typed 8992usb in there, it is blue. Click that, and it will tune the scanner for you. I don't have java enabled on my other computer. Seeing if I do on this one. lol got it, and just discovered voice chat on here. I may be scarred for life lol KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thanks. usually don't get a reply when i post. i have been on this site forever and still dont know how to work half the stuff on it :) Scroll down to the bottom of the scanner page, and find the chat box. I typed 8992usb in there, it is blue. Click that, and it will tune the scanner for you. I don't have java enabled on my other computer. Seeing if I do on this one. lol got it, and just discovered voice chat on here. I may be scarred for life lol |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, don't expect to hear constant chatter. It can go 45 minutes without a peep. lol This is pretty much what you will hear when they do an EAM or a SKYKING [link to youtu.be] |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 04:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, don't expect to hear constant chatter. It can go 45 minutes without a peep. lol Quoting: Tangy This is pretty much what you will hear when they do an EAM or a SKYKING [link to youtu.be] i listened awhile back and heard a few of them. i wasnt quite sure i was tuning right. Just decided to put headphones in and listen tonight after catching the threads and seeing what i have seen over my city the last few weeks. gotta pay attention :) KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 05:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, don't expect to hear constant chatter. It can go 45 minutes without a peep. lol Quoting: Tangy This is pretty much what you will hear when they do an EAM or a SKYKING [link to youtu.be] Thank you Tangy, Andrews test loud and clear KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 05:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm surfing GLP from bed or I would type out a ton of tips for using the WebSDR. I think I did post a bunch a few pages back though. Back in May or so. Maybe you can find those. If you have questions on how to tune, etc. Ask here, and I'll answer tomorrow. Have fun :) |
far from sane
User ID: 32211752 United States 06/24/2013 05:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm surfing GLP from bed or I would type out a ton of tips for using the WebSDR. Quoting: Tangy I think I did post a bunch a few pages back though. Back in May or so. Maybe you can find those. If you have questions on how to tune, etc. Ask here, and I'll answer tomorrow. Have fun :) Thanks bunches, have a good sleep :):peace: KIERAN/RAVEN, CALL ME WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I HAVE LEARNED ONE THING IN LIFE...ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING......( AND NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!) |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 05:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gthree777
User ID: 38798104 United States 06/24/2013 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Between this thread and the other one, and especially the posters, I just have to say I fucking Love GLP. It gets better by getting worse every year. Tangy you rock. Marine vet guy, you just need to observe here for a while before jumping in. I waited a couple years before I ever posted. And another year after that before I got an acct. Glp is special and has a special way about it. Learn it. And FTR, you brought the fight to this old page 50+ thread. If you did a search, you'd find dozens and dozens more on this topic. Please don't go posting there too. I will say I appreciate your input and think its very valuable. So I guess the lesson here is that it is valuable to have good communication skills, but more importantly is the understanding of local customs... Understandings that take time to appreciate.. Good night all. And thank you to all those that have voluntarily taken on the task of radio watch so that even those of us that can't follow it, can still benefit from anything it may produce. |
Tangy
User ID: 33861925 United States 06/24/2013 05:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Southern Lighthouse
(OP) User ID: 41511432 United States 06/30/2013 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Between this thread and the other one, and especially the posters, I just have to say I fucking Love GLP. It gets better by getting worse every year. Quoting: Gthree777 Tangy you rock. Marine vet guy, you just need to observe here for a while before jumping in. I waited a couple years before I ever posted. And another year after that before I got an acct. Glp is special and has a special way about it. Learn it. And FTR, you brought the fight to this old page 50+ thread. If you did a search, you'd find dozens and dozens more on this topic. Please don't go posting there too. I will say I appreciate your input and think its very valuable. So I guess the lesson here is that it is valuable to have good communication skills, but more importantly is the understanding of local customs... Understandings that take time to appreciate.. Good night all. And thank you to all those that have voluntarily taken on the task of radio watch so that even those of us that can't follow it, can still benefit from anything it may produce. Well said, very well said! Thanks, Gthree777! Thanks and much love to you, Tangy! Night all! Love is the highest form of spiritual warfare. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44489933 United States 08/06/2013 02:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Southern Lighthouse
(OP) User ID: 41511432 United States 08/06/2013 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |