Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Friday Day 10 - Motions and Jury Instructions

I don’t think prosecution wanted to win. =)

Not suspicious at all

This blurry faulty photo that the prosecution is basing their case on is definitely inaccurate. If the prosecutions evidence is seriously flawed they would be fools to present it as that.

He will definitely be disbarred and Pro TRUTH Court Officers will make sure of it . Good Night Undercover Antifa Phaggg

Last Edited by Adjudicator on 11/12/2021 07:34 PM

Exactly. No one says shit about all the other people that were there. Many whom had weapons including gun (which has already been proven in court). It's been proven part of these rioters are felons, convicted scum of some sort of evil crime. Gun shots all night. Kyle wasn't the only one there. Kyle wasn't the only one with a gun. Why the push for he shouldn't of been there? Had this happen to another armed man would the narrative be the same? Doubt it.

The prosecution has already proven that Kyle had the same right as anyone else to be there.

The looters, rioters, arsonists… they all had a right to be there. Kyle didn’t.

Liberal logic.

Or the prosecution.

It makes ZERO sense. He has to be someone. That’s the only explanation I have.

You are presenting evidence that a man aimed a gun at someone starting this whole ordeal. It changes the entire case, for me. It’s what will decide if this kid is innocent or guilty.

And they won’t call the witness to testify? What? In what world?

Not only this, but no one even brought it up. Neither side. Like it was off limits…

It’s blowing my mind. It would be one thing if the video evidence was clear. It’s not, and even then, why are you not bringing him in to clarify EXACTLY what happened.

If I were Kyle I would have fired my defense and brought this up. Especially with the new footage. He clearly didn’t aim the gun and they lied.

Idk. Just wild

The judge fucked up on letting the jury go until monday.



500 Wisconsin National Guard troops preparing to help support Kenosha authorities

MADISON, Wis. —
Gov. Tony Evers has authorized 500 Wisconsin National Guard troops to support Kenosha authorities as the Kyle Rittenhouse trial nears an end.

"We continue to be in close contact with our partners at the local level to ensure the state provides support and resources to help keep the Kenosha community and greater area safe," Evers said in a news release. "The Kenosha community has been strong, resilient, and has come together through incredibly difficult times these past two years, and that healing is still ongoing."

Members of the Wisconsin National Guard will stage outside Kenosha in a standby status to respond if requested by local law enforcement agencies.

[link to www.wisn.com (secure)]

Even today during the hearing, Kyle's attorney even brought up Ziminksi, but he put the blame on the prosecutor for not calling him to the stand when they were talking about allowing the blurry photo to be admitted into evidence. So they know the State didn't call him why doesn't the defense take any blame?

And I agree he has to be someone. Just like "yellow pants guy". Just like "dropkick guy". No one finds it odd that FBI had a drone flying over the exact location where Ziminksi was filming the IR footage? All of them were either unidentified or never subpoenaed. What in the actual fuck?1?1

I really did think they were trying to throw the case at the beginning, but Binger is a leftie with political aspirations, so I think it's more a matter of he didn't realize how hard this case would be to try. And then I think once he realized there would be no way to win, he tried to get a mistrial so he wouldn't "lose" the case.

Whatever it is, he's not on his game and it seems purposeful.

Oh I missed that. So they did bring it up…

Interesting…

I think maybe, neither party knew the truth and both were worried it would damage their case.

Ugh you guys are just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.

Nobody should have been there because the riot should not have happened in the first place. Kyle saw the adults in charge doing nothing so he went. He is 17 and out past curfew. He had a gun he wasn't legally allowed to have. He went to help because he felt like somebody had to fo something. I agree he is a good kid. Better than most his age. I agree! But he shouldn't have gone.

It's not a sudden push because I've said that all along since it happened. I am not some weird shill for gun control or whatever and you can do a search to see that I have been on glp for many years and have never pushed that type of narrative.

That said, I 100% believe he acted in self defense and is not in any way responsible for these deaths. That is a separate issue. Goodness guys. I'm not here to argue amd I don't think you're even reading what I'm saying because if you were, you wouldn't be hateful to me.


Geez these things bring out the worst in people. We're on the same side and yet...

Welp, sowing division. Nice.

Whoa. This is wild.

You’re the odd man out pushing the msm

It’s blatantly clear the prosecution will use provocation on Monday as their basis to sway the jury.

And you just keep repeating it, and repeating it, and repeating it.

Last Edited by NeroAxia on 11/12/2021 08:05 PM

FFS I give up

Still -

Your arguing your feelings rather than the law. It hasn't been determined weather he had a gun he wasn't legally allowed to have. Defense has stated the the law the prosecution is pushing applies to 16 and under. Not 18 and under like the prosecution is fighting for. We'll know Monday when we hear the judges ruling.

You did not raise your son to be a selfless citizen, but Kyle was apparently raised that way. He knew what was right for him to do and he did it. It may not have been right for your son, but it was right for Kyle.

I understand both points.

I bet if we asked Kyle right now he would wish he never went.

In a recent interview, his mom said he would still go out to help. Apparently that's how his mom raised him.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 11/12/2021 08:22 PM

That shoe fits , explains the focused video from chopper.

So, an FBI asset fired the shot that led to all this? Wouldn’t surprise me one bit.

[link to youtu.be (secure)]
Go to 1:42.00 where defense talks about Ziminksi

I don't know , but if Zeminski and the F bee I were running an OP , perhaps as the Prosecution has firmly been focused on, it was about getting rid of AR15 s.

I was agreeing with you

And, yes, there is a much bigger agenda at play.

Then why even bother with saying Kyle shouldnt of been there in the first place??? That was your words. Want me to quote it for you? Why not say it just plain self defense? But NO you had to say Kyle. You could of said " I agree none of these people should of been there in the first place" instead? Then to rebuttal yourself you say you agree 100% agree it was self defense. It shows your illogical thinking how you want to justify somehow Kyle did something wrong but at the same time he did something right. This case isn't about why who was there and why. It's is about SELF DEFENSE. PEROID. END OF STORY.

So they're saying that someone who in their view provoked an attack, does not have the right to self defense.

The state argues that extinguishing fires banishes the right to self defense because it provokes them.

Pdf on Robert Barnes Viva locals.

Unbelievable!

And its crap shot what kind of jury. What bias's.

Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 11/12/2021 08:34 PM