Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Live - Day 9

WOW!! I didn't see this posted! So I guess I wasn't too far off. Thanks for sharing that!!

An interesting turn of events and a subject that could include the F bee I's pre- disposition towards setting up criminal situations.

[liveleak] [link to thefederalist.com (secure)]

Last Edited by PINKORCHID- In the Light on 11/11/2021 06:48 PM

Prosecutor would say 4 golden rules of fire arm safety. Don't put your finger on the trigger unless you are ready to shoot. They would just say Kyle was already intended to shoot him and the pulling action just initiated it for Kyle.l already intent on murder.

Last Edited by ThumbsUp on 11/11/2021 06:53 PM

If it was his right hand, not on the trigger yet, but with the way you position your hands to get ready, twisting the barrel could slip your finger into position. He was on the ground.

prosecution has 1 more shot at a misstrial. best make some popcorn.

So the guy who Rittenhouse allegedly pointed the gun at (Joshua Ziminski) in minute detail that may be fictionalized courtesy of a resize algorithm never was a witness for the prosecution? Never testified to Rittenhouse pointing the gun at him? Is there even a police record of that? They just spontaneously generated it out of perverted desperation to win at all costs, no matter what can be objectively proven.

I have seen suggestion that this may be prosecutorial misconduct unless it is backed up by a witness account?

Last Edited by GooPile on 11/11/2021 07:07 PM

Objection - Not the only plausible reason.

Your statment presumes guilt before action and also would therefore assume that any gun grabbing means those gun holders having an intent to kill, which is not the case in many instances , only an intent to defend.
A passive stance rather than an aggressive attacking stance.

I'm saying you are wrong just what I would likely see this prosecutor saying..

Last Edited by ThumbsUp on 11/11/2021 07:28 PM

That could be anything, nobodies going to buy this is a gun.

As usual the prosecution is trying to make something out of nothing. They know they have lost and are trying to fabricate some grounds for appeal.

Rittenhouse testified that he did intentionally fire the shot that hit Huber. I believe he did so for all 8 shots

moot point

He's a righty.

If someone is pulling your gun away in a close hand to hand combat type situation, and you're on your back on the ground, I could see fear take over a need for self defense in whatever way will preserve your own life.

Not sure if they'd turn that gun on you if taken away and given the chance.

These rioters were hell bent on getting Kyle. Who knows what they would of done had Kyle been disarmed. We already see one armed rioter go in for a kill shot but Kyle reacted faster and "vaporized" his bicep off. Another hit him in the head with a chunk of concrete. I would say they wanted him dead or alive.. most likely dead.

Absolutely.

Thread: The same people who want Kyle Rittenhouse found guilty, are the same people who would have killed him that night.

lol. good one!

The prosecution's case has more holes in it than Joseph Rosenbum. The only way Kyle will be found guilty is if the jury votes by mail-in ballots.

So what seemed pretty clear in the beginning is already being worn down and his fate will fall to what the media dictates.
Again.