Let's decentralize the internet | |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This intrigues me Quoting: klfiend What sorts of languages do I need to learn? Bluetooth protocols would make excellent mesh networks I'm using Javascript / Node with Webtorrent related libraries. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm with you in spirit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79337261 Not sure if I could help but code regularly in Python, c++. I use Tor - not perfect but it's a start. OP: What would be your first priority? In my experience, setting small goals would allow people to contribute. Since MicroShaft took over Github I have thought to try and minimize use of that - so perhaps a venue for code repo might be a first check item?? Suggestion: GitLab?? I think it's important to be Open Source (I've open sourced my entire life!! - It's great... COMPLETE FREEDOM!) Once people begin to see code and aims, we can get involved. Maybe we can use what I'm building to create a decentralized Github/Gitlab. That is possible.. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm with you in spirit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79337261 Not sure if I could help but code regularly in Python, c++. I use Tor - not perfect but it's a start. OP: What would be your first priority? In my experience, setting small goals would allow people to contribute. Since MicroShaft took over Github I have thought to try and minimize use of that - so perhaps a venue for code repo might be a first check item?? Suggestion: GitLab?? I think it's important to be Open Source (I've open sourced my entire life!! - It's great... COMPLETE FREEDOM!) Once people begin to see code and aims, we can get involved. Honestly, my "parenthesis management" is better than the above text when I code... lol... You mentioned you were not into crypto BUT there exists some decentralised infrastructure which might be leveraged. For example, decentralised DNS exists using NameCoin..I've never used it and I don't own any of the tokens.. but... Namecoin uses blockchain technology to distribute its DNS amongst the users on the network. "You can think of the Dot-Bit DNS as a decentralized, Internet phone book." [link to coincentral.com (secure)] Right now, my main goal is to solve an issue with WebTorrent tracker servers. From there, lots of other possibilities... I haven't completely ruled out crypto or ipfs. I'm just not fond of them. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80583583 United States 07/14/2021 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | herein lies the problem.... just like telephones, it requires a "central" switching board to locate from P2P... to decentralize would take node finding from the hands of a 'said' authority.... that said, I have worked on p2p myself... using something like an IP locater, but there is the problem, still need the central 'switching board' I'm willing to help you boaty ;) Yeah, that's exactly what I'm trying to solve at the moment. Instead of a central switching board, I'm building a swarm of central switching boards. It's still centralized in a way, but it will be less centralized than a single public tracker server. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to ipfs.io (secure)] seems to be onto some good and useful things. Quoting: Jommy99 Have you looked into what other similar projects are doing? IPFS is interesting, but to pin data, you must run a node. My goal is to allow for instantaneous information sharing from the browser with no server whatsoever.. I was just skimming through content and found your post. I've used IPFS for at least 4 years, running nodes. We used it for Dsound (a decentralized streaming platform), that was running on the Steem blockchain. IPFS is pretty much peer to peer technology, and still use your normal ISP. In any case, if you want a truly decentralized project, it will have to be on the blockchain, and keep in mind that nothing runs smoothly at first. Nah, not really. WebTorrent leverages WebRTC, which makes it possible for browsers to communicate directly with each other. Another interesting project called Direct Sockets may eventually do away with the need for tracker servers altogether. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if your goal is unrestricted communication, you're barking up the wrong tree. If any part of your route crosses into the conventional internet -- even if your packets are embedded and/or encrypted -- you're still at the mercy of someone who can flip a switch, unplug a wire, or configure a firewall. Quoting: Freewheel Put simply, what's needed is an inexpensive hardware mesh router; something solar-powered and weatherproof. Toss enough of those in inconspicuous places and the terrestrial network becomes irrelevant. I really like this idea.. it's outside of the scope of what I'm working on at the moment. Adoption is a huge problem though. I could imagine participating in a router project like Merlin or similar to make something like this happen though. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
Pinochet'sChopperPilot
User ID: 80610041 United States 07/14/2021 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. It already is. Tor I2P Freenet Just to name a few. You could set up an old school dial up BBS. How about a decentralized wireless mesh network. Or if you you really want to live on the edge check out AirChat. Come on and take a free ride. |
BoatyMcBoatface
(OP) User ID: 77825331 United States 07/14/2021 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. It already is. Tor I2P Freenet Just to name a few. You could set up an old school dial up BBS. How about a decentralized wireless mesh network. Or if you you really want to live on the edge check out AirChat. Thanks. I know there are other projects, but they require downloading a separate browser, installing an extension, etc. I'm trying to make this possible from anyone's regular browser (PC or mobile), without extensions, which I already have working. Trying to solve an issue with centralized tracker servers at the moment, by decentralizing trackers across a universal tracker swarm. ```````````````` ````__/\__`````` ~~~\____/~~~~ .~~..~~~....~~~ ~..~~~....~~~~ Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie. - 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76708651 07/14/2021 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FRUEDIAN SLIP "HERE'S THE REALITY: WE HAVE MILLIONS WHO'VE DIED ACROSS THE WORLD BY THIS VACCINE. WE MAY NEVER HAVE AN ACCURATE COUNT." -- Illinois Senator Dick Durbin Thread: FRUEDIAN SLIP: 'Here's the reality We have millions who've died across the world by this vaccine we may never have an accurate count [link to twitter.com (secure)] this^ |
A.E.O.N.
User ID: 80119831 United States 07/14/2021 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72507291 United States 07/14/2021 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | people can post gateway lists on the internet. servers would need to come up and go down if they stayed up all the time they would get taken down and you would probably get taken down with it. in order to keep track of it all you have peers these people may or may not know each otherbut traffic can go through them and they can maintain their own lists which are dynamic similar to routing protocols you would need to have something like that or working along with it the tour has vulnerabilities and back doors all of the gateways are controlled if you put up a gateway it'll be taken down and you might be taken down with it in order for tour to be more secure gateways and other nodes should have more than one internet connection such as a cable modem DSL LTE and a peer connection to a nearby Wi-Fi by routing traffic in one connection and out to others it makes it more difficult for anyone to track where the traffic is going as it stands traffic goes in and AT&t connection and comes out in a t & t connection and it's trivially easy to track that and trace it back to its source. the crime syndicate that controls our government has already created software to track these connections across multiple isps so without the pure Wi-Fi it's pointless and even with it it's not enough. |
Pinochet'sChopperPilot
User ID: 79881278 United States 07/14/2021 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. It already is. Tor I2P Freenet Just to name a few. You could set up an old school dial up BBS. How about a decentralized wireless mesh network. Or if you you really want to live on the edge check out AirChat. Thanks. I know there are other projects, but they require downloading a separate browser, installing an extension, etc. I'm trying to make this possible from anyone's regular browser (PC or mobile), without extensions, which I already have working. Trying to solve an issue with centralized tracker servers at the moment, by decentralizing trackers across a universal tracker swarm. Can't be done. You have to intercept the traffic before it goes out to a DNS server and route it somewhere else. Come on and take a free ride. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73558198 United States 07/14/2021 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to github.com (secure)] 1. Collect all the available general purpose ontologies that have been formalized in logic, including rules 2. Merge those axioms into a common product 3. Identify major areas of general knowledge that are not covered in existing research projects 4. Ontologize those areas 5. Map SUMO to WordNet 6. Augment SUMO with new ontological areas identified as missing in the process of doing the WordNet mappings. WordNet word meanings that do not have a "home" at a reasonably specific level of SUMO indicate a potential ontological gap. Follow an arbitrary cutoff of 1000 terms in SUMO, if the 1001st term is needed, put it in an appropriate domain ontology, or the MId-Level Ontology. 7. Develop domain ontologies as needed for a variety of customers 8. Add concepts to SUMO for domain specific content that isn't well supported at the upper level 9. Run a formal theorem prover on SUMO and the domain ontologies in order to find contradictions. Correct contradictions and add additional content as needed 10. Conduct an effort to extend SUMO by identifying the more common synsets in WordNet (those with an occurrance of greater than 3 in statistical count with respect to the Brown Corpus, otherwise known as WordNet SemCor) and create an equivalent concept if none already exists. 11. Repeat steps 7-9 |
American Poet
User ID: 76462809 United States 07/14/2021 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Big tech will NEVER relinquish her power, specially one funded by gov. Only $35 trillion missing? Buwahahhah we invested some of that just to track your ass. Disemination of information was taken care of in the first $5 trillion. Some was used for smart toilets. The rest? You get the picture. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75699704 United States 07/14/2021 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78132734 France 07/15/2021 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jtmarlin42
User ID: 79760695 United States 07/15/2021 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Agent MIB
User ID: 80611063 Philippines 07/15/2021 01:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't know what you've got until it's gone OP. People are content to sit and be keyboard warriors and then their outlet is taken away and it's only after it's too late they realized they should have fought harder. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80189112 I think people on GLP just don't know programming. That's fine. I wish I had someone to talk to about this though. It's important. I have a few patents in digital communications. The internet by design was intended to be DECENTRALIZED. It used to be called DARPAnet and was to establish redundant and rebust comms during nuclear war. The only exception being are organizations like IANA and IEEE which are needed to maintain standards. Otherwise nothing would be able to communicate and be incompatible if it were all proprietary. There is Packet Radio which uses RF on VHF/UHF and RTTY on HF bands. VHF/UHF bands are short range comms < 100km, but there is meteor scatter in which the signal gets reflected back by the ionized air from the meteor burning up. Before cellphones, many trucking companies used this method to keep track of their fleets. HF bands can reach globally depending upon the solar weather and ionosphere conditions. RTTY is like using a 300 baud modem from the 1980's. At best you could get around 128 bytes of data in a packet. I'm trying to understand what you mean by "decentralize the internet". If you're talking about clandestine comms, then you're talking old school spycraft techniques. Drop points for encrypted thumbdrives like ironkey, numbers stations, etc. But quantum encryption is the only way to ensure the sender and receiver have secure data. If some "man in the middle" intercepts it, it would tip off the intended persons (operatives) their comms and themselves are compromised. So again, what is the purpose of your thread? You are born with the truth, then taught a lie. |
Glaxnor
User ID: 80607164 China 07/15/2021 01:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't know what you've got until it's gone OP. People are content to sit and be keyboard warriors and then their outlet is taken away and it's only after it's too late they realized they should have fought harder. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80189112 I think people on GLP just don't know programming. That's fine. I wish I had someone to talk to about this though. It's important. I have a few patents in digital communications. The internet by design was intended to be DECENTRALIZED. It used to be called DARPAnet and was to establish redundant and rebust comms during nuclear war. The only exception being are organizations like IANA and IEEE which are needed to maintain standards. Otherwise nothing would be able to communicate and be incompatible if it were all proprietary. There is Packet Radio which uses RF on VHF/UHF and RTTY on HF bands. VHF/UHF bands are short range comms < 100km, but there is meteor scatter in which the signal gets reflected back by the ionized air from the meteor burning up. Before cellphones, many trucking companies used this method to keep track of their fleets. HF bands can reach globally depending upon the solar weather and ionosphere conditions. RTTY is like using a 300 baud modem from the 1980's. At best you could get around 128 bytes of data in a packet. I'm trying to understand what you mean by "decentralize the internet". If you're talking about clandestine comms, then you're talking old school spycraft techniques. Drop points for encrypted thumbdrives like ironkey, numbers stations, etc. But quantum encryption is the only way to ensure the sender and receiver have secure data. If some "man in the middle" intercepts it, it would tip off the intended persons (operatives) their comms and themselves are compromised. So again, what is the purpose of your thread? Building a quantum network sounds easy. Empty Men offer Empty Words and Empty Hearts. |
pish
Turtle Hermit User ID: 78227579 United States 07/15/2021 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80559376 United States 07/15/2021 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It sounds like you are trying to design something without any specific requirements or goals in mind. What exactly does "decentralize" mean to you? I mean are you talking about this being an overlay on the internet or something completely isolated? If it's an overlay on the internet, what is it that it is supposed to solve? Is the intention to still be able to access internet resources or have something isolated that can only be reached if participating, similar to Tor? If it's not to access existing Internet resources, then what resources would it be accessing and where would the hosting occur? Just not a lot of sense to this thread. |
Pinochet'sChopperPilot
User ID: 80610041 United States 07/15/2021 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't know what you've got until it's gone OP. People are content to sit and be keyboard warriors and then their outlet is taken away and it's only after it's too late they realized they should have fought harder. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80189112 I think people on GLP just don't know programming. That's fine. I wish I had someone to talk to about this though. It's important. I have a few patents in digital communications. The internet by design was intended to be DECENTRALIZED. It used to be called DARPAnet and was to establish redundant and rebust comms during nuclear war. The only exception being are organizations like IANA and IEEE which are needed to maintain standards. Otherwise nothing would be able to communicate and be incompatible if it were all proprietary. There is Packet Radio which uses RF on VHF/UHF and RTTY on HF bands. VHF/UHF bands are short range comms < 100km, but there is meteor scatter in which the signal gets reflected back by the ionized air from the meteor burning up. Before cellphones, many trucking companies used this method to keep track of their fleets. HF bands can reach globally depending upon the solar weather and ionosphere conditions. RTTY is like using a 300 baud modem from the 1980's. At best you could get around 128 bytes of data in a packet. I'm trying to understand what you mean by "decentralize the internet". If you're talking about clandestine comms, then you're talking old school spycraft techniques. Drop points for encrypted thumbdrives like ironkey, numbers stations, etc. But quantum encryption is the only way to ensure the sender and receiver have secure data. If some "man in the middle" intercepts it, it would tip off the intended persons (operatives) their comms and themselves are compromised. So again, what is the purpose of your thread? Building a quantum network sounds easy. Isn't that how Skynet came into existence. Come on and take a free ride. |
Glaxnor
User ID: 80607164 China 07/15/2021 02:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface I think people on GLP just don't know programming. That's fine. I wish I had someone to talk to about this though. It's important. I have a few patents in digital communications. The internet by design was intended to be DECENTRALIZED. It used to be called DARPAnet and was to establish redundant and rebust comms during nuclear war. The only exception being are organizations like IANA and IEEE which are needed to maintain standards. Otherwise nothing would be able to communicate and be incompatible if it were all proprietary. There is Packet Radio which uses RF on VHF/UHF and RTTY on HF bands. VHF/UHF bands are short range comms < 100km, but there is meteor scatter in which the signal gets reflected back by the ionized air from the meteor burning up. Before cellphones, many trucking companies used this method to keep track of their fleets. HF bands can reach globally depending upon the solar weather and ionosphere conditions. RTTY is like using a 300 baud modem from the 1980's. At best you could get around 128 bytes of data in a packet. I'm trying to understand what you mean by "decentralize the internet". If you're talking about clandestine comms, then you're talking old school spycraft techniques. Drop points for encrypted thumbdrives like ironkey, numbers stations, etc. But quantum encryption is the only way to ensure the sender and receiver have secure data. If some "man in the middle" intercepts it, it would tip off the intended persons (operatives) their comms and themselves are compromised. So again, what is the purpose of your thread? Building a quantum network sounds easy. Isn't that how Skynet came into existence. Beep Boop. I am only here to bring peace. Boop beep. Empty Men offer Empty Words and Empty Hearts. |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 07/15/2021 07:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. It already is. Tor I2P Freenet Just to name a few. You could set up an old school dial up BBS. How about a decentralized wireless mesh network. Or if you you really want to live on the edge check out AirChat. There is Yggdrasil and CJDNS which aim to be like an encrypted decentralized wireless mesh network. They can also use the Internet as a back bone. I have tried CJDNS over secure ad-hoc APs and I was able to send traffic over 100s of APs but at that time I switched back to batman-adv since it was a little more stable. [link to yggdrasil-network.github.io (secure)] [link to wiki.archlinux.org (secure)] Last Edited by Achduke7 on 07/15/2021 07:35 AM Achduke |
Rendar
User ID: 80613766 United States 07/15/2021 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Association for Computing Machinery posted some cool talks from the recent Principles of Distributed Computing symposium. Check 'em out: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
MK_Oprah
User ID: 80847407 United States 09/09/2021 04:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just saw this, I am a programmer, and I would be interested in what you are talking about. Although I think the statement, 'there are problems' is a bit of a stretch. Quoting: Glaxnor I don't have a PM, so I can't talk that way. Just here to have fun and blow off some steam. My focus is on python and learning. Just FYI. Internet infrastructure has always had a slap-dash feel to me and I just can't stand it. Building something that can circumvent ISP would be critical. Then the next step is something that automatically cracks down on bad actors. I have never thought about completely subverting the ISP. I knew some people that had done things similar, but never thought about a large scale implementation. Can't Stop the Signal Mal. It needs to be simple and elegant. A fun design. Can't get more simple than zigbee PAN [link to zigbeealliance.org (secure)] I've thought of an "out of band" Intranet connected together via wireless using Lora. Lora in the US is in the 900 Mhz Spectrum, so using directional antennas, one can establish p2p connections several miles. Where a wireless link could not be established, use some sort of encrypted tunnel over current Internet. Also wherever possible run Fiber to your neighbor etc... Problem with Lora though, Amazon is already flooding that spectrum with their IoT Sidewalk trash. With Lora, I think you could only achive modem like speeds, but text info is just as powerful as videos. I was using BBS's in the 80's, so I imagine folks could create BBS's. I do know that some Amateur radio operators are already doing this over the Ham Bands, but that requires licensing, whereas Lora is License free. HomeGoy |
MK_Oprah
User ID: 80847407 United States 09/09/2021 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. It already is. Tor I2P Freenet Just to name a few. You could set up an old school dial up BBS. How about a decentralized wireless mesh network. Or if you you really want to live on the edge check out AirChat. There is Yggdrasil and CJDNS which aim to be like an encrypted decentralized wireless mesh network. They can also use the Internet as a back bone. I have tried CJDNS over secure ad-hoc APs and I was able to send traffic over 100s of APs but at that time I switched back to batman-adv since it was a little more stable. [link to yggdrasil-network.github.io (secure)] [link to wiki.archlinux.org (secure)] That is awesome. Have you looked at Althea.net? Their business model is to reward those that expand and/or pass network traffic through their routers to be rewarded with crypto, so effectively creating a real asset backed crypto currency. HomeGoy |
MK_Oprah
User ID: 80847407 United States 09/09/2021 05:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It sounds like you are trying to design something without any specific requirements or goals in mind. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80559376 What exactly does "decentralize" mean to you? I mean are you talking about this being an overlay on the internet or something completely isolated? If it's an overlay on the internet, what is it that it is supposed to solve? Is the intention to still be able to access internet resources or have something isolated that can only be reached if participating, similar to Tor? If it's not to access existing Internet resources, then what resources would it be accessing and where would the hosting occur? Just not a lot of sense to this thread. This thread is very important considering todays undeclared and unrestricted war is being fought on information mediums. HomeGoy |
Hadriana
User ID: 77936235 United States 09/09/2021 05:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never stopped working on P2P related stuff to help decentralize communication on the internet. Quoting: BoatyMcBoatface One of the latest things I've worked on is creating a mesh of p2p tracker servers so decentralized apps no longer need to depend on the few overloaded public tracker servers. I'm trying to work out how to make servers participating in the swarm of trackers more secure for individual applications, but still allow them to share other trackers between each other. Ideally, it would be a giant globally interconnected mesh of P2P tracker servers that can be used by whatever P2P app needs it... Much more work to be done. It's fun to work on, but I need a collaborator or two... Ironically, building P2P technologies happens to be a very isolating endeavor. Probably because it isn't easy at all. Like gnutella? Is there any code there that you could use? |