Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Building the past as we go along so that the logical narrative can be modified suitably.

Yes, the cult were seeing what they were doing. How could they not?

What do you think this means, if you could boil it down to one sentence?

Continuous change is not uncertainty but the nature of existence.


It is very nice. She is in the next room as I type these words.


It is an amalgam, with the role of "Jesus' being the base.

But if you believe the cult's version of history then you might be missing the mark. As one of many examples, the concept of 'warfare' only came about recently. We assume that 'forts' and 'castles' are built for defence because that is what they tell us, for example. There is much to un-learn.

Take away what their media shows you and you will see that nearly all of the 'bad' you assume exists isn't really so.

It's mostly made up. Their fantasy serves the purpose of getting us to imitate it. There is far more good than we realise, but it is hidden. (We are the ones hiding it.)


You will find no truth in these messages. It is beyond interpretation, as all ways.


How something seems is not really useful, because it is mostly irrelevant.

We have 'lost touch' with those things in past that are no longer relevant, of course. I have 'lost touch' with myself as a 5 year-old, for example; as it should be.

Pure Order isn't healthy. A mix of Chaos and Order brings about the most nutritious soup. That is why we have the Luna and the Sola, the me and the Maria.

Think of it like two sides of the 'occult' pyramid on the back of a US dollar. One side is Earth 1, the other is Earth 2. They are of the same foundation, but different ways of looking at it. They converge as time goes 'up' to a point. This point is the two sides coming together, you could say. Each step of the coiled antennae allows for a different kind of reality. As we go 'up' in time one side coils more around the other so that a new type of signal can be received, and thus interpreted.

... to uncoil again and repeat the process.

We are now living in that alternative meta world. A mix of the two, of something new. As I've said many years ago our worlds are merging and the world that you know will become more strange and metaphysical-like. And here we are. But the process isn't finished yet, as we haven't 'reached the apex' that begins the process anew.


The script leads to Maria being dissolved and that new condition being the impetus for me to reach the apex, which is why I have avoided this path for so long.

"I do not want this," but at the same time she is what has opened my eyes to the greater reality.

Regardless, the cycle of the world's breath compels me.


The cult has built this place, of many, to discover evidence of their messi-ah so that they would have the advantage of time. They did not know where such a thing would come from, or how, so they opened the door to everything. It is a greater honeypot than a university or club, as the kind of thing they seek does not conform to strict rules for that long.

Few, if any, of them know and understand that their own blood will end the reign of Chaos to begin the process afresh.

Chaos needs good. Order needs evil.


Beyond curiosity? I do not know. Perhaps, that you will still be standing when all is said and done?

What media besides the production of your material could I discover where the cult hasn't produced meta fiction. Drop some book titles, or some pages that you last read from.
If these pages requires a visualization throw me a bone key.

It's hard to fully wrap the idea of Maria, your counterpart. Much is left up to the imagination. I may prefer to discover the idea of Maria in a process instead of being able to imagine the entirety of my curiosity in a sitting.



When you say Maria being dissolved my mind shows me an image of Lucy (10/10) Movie CLIP - I Am Everywhere.

'Greater reality' how many people are knowingly opened to this reality.

Maybe cult censorship and promotion tactics change the internet in a great degree to curve the open door towards their favor. Which seems like it's already up to par.



Comforting words for inevitable time of the human experience.

Weird. I just talked about war and armies not needing to exist, and not existing in our past, to my now ex-girlfriend this weekend.

Her reaction showed me that she thought I was nuts.

I thought she was nuts about taking the vaccine one month ago and only telling me last sunday.

Mass media is the domain of the cult. Its arms - internet, television, broadcast music, etc - are designed with control and subjugation in mind, from the beginning.

You don't need books to find something that hasn't been touched by the cult, or understand yourself or your reality. Just look around you and learn to see your self.

But 'understanding' is meaningless without action. Conversely, you can act in a 'divine' way without understanding it at all.

For published books, they do the publishing, editing, translating, or writing, etc. Although a book such as "Art of Living" by "Epictetus", for example, has many useful maxims, it still relies on the translator, editor, and publisher who is, almost always, active in the cult. Or, if it's listed on Amazon it may only be shown to those who are all ready interested in such material and would likely do nothing more than read it (rather than act upon it).


There is no need to, of course. There's also no need to ever consider your counterpart outside of any dream. If you're curious, though, try looking deep into your eyes for a few minutes a day and seeing the 'other' you; the You that is there before your brain turns it upside-down.


In a way, everyone is. It is what this reality depends upon and what we reference at each moment.


It's more centralisation than censorship, though the former doesn't allow us to feel like a victim but as part of a process.

Nearly all technologies begin with decentralisation then move towards centralisation. Detroit didn't censor its 500 car companies when Henry Ford started making cars, for example. It was just the Order (centralisation) coming into play. The characters who administer this anti-chaos are playing a role that makes them appear bad or 'evil' and those administering chaos (decentralisation) appear 'good'.

A mix of both centralisaion and decentralisation is healthier for society, such as how we used to live in a matrix of small communities.

Yes. Indoctrination is very powerful.

So powerful, in fact, that the only options we consider when we want to change a tyrannical society, for example, are the ones that the tyrants show us on television and in movies.

One thing that conflict archaeologists will not tell you is that there is no conclusive evidence for the battles and wars of "history" books.*

Wars and battles were more like kabuki theatre or a signal of strength for the most part. Perhaps a better comparison would be modern professional sports.

The Battle of Anghiari, for example, sounds heroic and violent until you realise that several thousand troops battled for four hours and only one soldier died (when he fell off of his horse).

*sometimes they do: [link to www.tandfonline.com (secure)]

Last Edited by The Builder on 07/22/2021 03:20 AM

amusing, from the above link:

"Modern archaeologists have so far drawn a blank in finding human remains at virtually all English and French battlefields of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries"

Yet, our televisions, novels, and stories are filled to the brim with warfare, violence, dinosaurs, aliens, and other things that are either against our nature or didn't really exist in the first place.

I don’t. Just an observation.

Imma do me

Says the time(s)pace-bender :)

Memory chains are funny like that.

I am contradiction becoming paradox

I’m rooting for you

"...they will bow"! Yes! They will! It's going to be glorious!

I have been on this site for years and this is the best and most important thread I have ever read

Yo

I recurred this excerpt in remembrance of these associations.

Common conception arranges relations of order to cold and chaos to hot (whether that is logical). Here I have something of note.

To the Church in Laodicea

14 “And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: ‘The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God's creation.

15 “‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! 16 So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. 17 For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. 18 I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may be rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see. 19 Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline, so be zealous and repent. 20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. 21 The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne. 22 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’”

The full body is included for context. This is part of a series of indictments and commendations of the various churches of the times.

What do you suppose this means in comparison to the message of exhibiting the balance of order and chaos. Is this not what it means to be lukewarm?

Could one of these spell a heresy? They seem to contradict.

I disapprove of Jordan Peterson's teaching as my approach, regardless. It is too much like something out of a fantasy book than having to do with spiritual reality.

It would seem that the Great Spirit of Christ expresses disgust at such a teaching.

Very interesting.

Thank you.

And I am taking my own, sweet time so it's good to be rooted for!

Thank you for your interest and support!

How can you be so sure that "This is part of a series of indictments and commendations of the various churches of the times...."?

be careful :)


Why would it? Would it make sense to be disgusted by something inside of it?

How can you be so characterizing?

Careful of what in particular?



Why would it? Would it make sense to be disgusted by something inside of it?


The writing describes the Spirit's perspective of a lukewarm church: impending vomit.

This has been disappointing. Let's discontinue the con vers at ion pathway. (my curiosity has been reduced to nil).

In transparency, I don't recall the curiosity I had of writing the post and questions. It is not because of the response (yeah I was disappointed but the expectation can be creative of that).

No, I'm not "so sure" about the & cetera of interpretation of the writtens. This is called a projection, yes? Projecting upon my presence some exhibition of certainty.

The question was neutral transparency, high openness. It doesn't need an answer.

However, the interest I see in retrospect could be off topic for this thread and so "lets' discontinue".

As for the one who shall not be named (for whatever reason it is given specialness) - no personal animosity here.

Many refer to chaos, order and balancing such englishments without explicating their definitions. I have found that order is irrelevant to that which repeats. Thus, order may be irrelevant to stability (in time or space).

So would someone say chaos is more relevant to stability or does that seem as nonsensical to someone as it does here. Just saying.

From where comes such a notion that there is a balance in the midst of these? What if they are irrelevant to each other.

And what's with all these assumptions.

Yes, as one can be disgusted by one’s own excrement, urine, vomit inside one’s body.

You stated it as a fact, so I'm just wondering why you think it is in order to answer the question you asked after it.

I'm curious as to what part of the question would be "characterizing".

The various deceptions that come from him and others like him.


What is your definition of "church"? It may be worth considering that the meaning of the word has changed, so the meaning of the text would be lost.

Last Edited by The Builder on 08/14/2021 05:06 AM

It's more efficient that way, I agree.

I would hope that such a "great spirit" would realise that it's not so separate, and have more understanding and awareness of said excrement :)