Disturbing American special operations psychological warfare video | |
Cabin Dweller
User ID: 9379969 United States 05/05/2022 05:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The history of the Psywar concept is dark. Look up Michael Aquino, who coined the term and early usage in the Army, who also was an open Satanist. If you couple this with the recurring NATOWave stuff, one wonders what new entity is being birthed from the military in support of the planned NWO. Perhaps the woke facade will end up being discarded in the name of a populism toward a more acceptable cause to the public that might have a darker plan. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79833845 United States 05/05/2022 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80635148 Netherlands 05/05/2022 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76091990 Australia 05/05/2022 05:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76091990 I didn't think it was disturbing either, but I think you misunderstand the warfare they're talking about. Warfare has always been real and like your example of the 22yo with ptsd. Imagined or indirect trauma can be a useful tool in war. I think you dont know what I am talking about. You're right. It seems like you were talking about physical conflicts where people die and trillions are wasted protecting poppy fields. I was talking about demoralizing enemy combatants by using propaganda into non combative protesting before actual conflict. I'm willing to admit I was wrong due to inexperience, if you're willing to admit we're just looking at things differently. What about an agreement to disagree? But you are talking about two kinds of war. The war which causes people to die and trillions to be wasted doesn't involve any actual loss to that mindset. These are private interests being protected and making money, not the US economy. The second kind of war is largely conducted against people who are opposed to the first, both foreign and domestic. Now if I object to my people dying and the coffers of my country being drained to benefit a select few who have highly questionable loyalty to the country doing their fighting, this makes me an 'enemy' of my country. So both versions mean our country/all countries are only the vehicle for special interests and our military are in every case a mercenary class. In that case, trauma is definitely useful. Rapists and slave-dealers think the same thing. I thought that AC 8286 was talking about physical war, whereas I assumed with Twatter blowing up we were in a digital war. One it seemed he didn't think was real war because nobody died. That was the underlining theme of our disagreement. It's ok for people to disagree because opinions are like bums, everyone's got one and this is the internet. Militaries are useful and so are the people that are in them. However it takes a very naive or immoral person to question whether those militaries should be used in foreign policy. Either the naive person believes the military shouldn't be used to aggrandize wealthy people like the Sacklers who bribe politicians for those lucrative Government contracts. Or the immoral person knows it and profits from it by owning corporate stock who would do well in the event of conflict. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75887125 United States 05/05/2022 05:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82641087 Russia 05/05/2022 05:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71290817 United Kingdom 05/05/2022 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71290817 United Kingdom 05/05/2022 06:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. Says some cunt purporting to be from Russia What a schmuck. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80635148 Netherlands 05/05/2022 06:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. Every single thing you wrote is utter nonsense. Congratulations. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71290817 United Kingdom 05/05/2022 06:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76817319 United States 05/05/2022 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're right. It seems like you were talking about physical conflicts where people die and trillions are wasted protecting poppy fields. I was talking about demoralizing enemy combatants by using propaganda into non combative protesting before actual conflict. I'm willing to admit I was wrong due to inexperience, if you're willing to admit we're just looking at things differently. What about an agreement to disagree? But you are talking about two kinds of war. The war which causes people to die and trillions to be wasted doesn't involve any actual loss to that mindset. These are private interests being protected and making money, not the US economy. The second kind of war is largely conducted against people who are opposed to the first, both foreign and domestic. Now if I object to my people dying and the coffers of my country being drained to benefit a select few who have highly questionable loyalty to the country doing their fighting, this makes me an 'enemy' of my country. So both versions mean our country/all countries are only the vehicle for special interests and our military are in every case a mercenary class. In that case, trauma is definitely useful. Rapists and slave-dealers think the same thing. I thought that AC 8286 was talking about physical war, whereas I assumed with Twatter blowing up we were in a digital war. One it seemed he didn't think was real war because nobody died. That was the underlining theme of our disagreement. It's ok for people to disagree because opinions are like bums, everyone's got one and this is the internet. Militaries are useful and so are the people that are in them. However it takes a very naive or immoral person to question whether those militaries should be used in foreign policy. Either the naive person believes the military shouldn't be used to aggrandize wealthy people like the Sacklers who bribe politicians for those lucrative Government contracts. Or the immoral person knows it and profits from it by owning corporate stock who would do well in the event of conflict. Shouldn't be used, or wouldn't be used? |
Agent 99
User ID: 77082640 United States 05/05/2022 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” Art of War. This is a prime example of Asymmetrical Warfare. Using psychological methods to breakdown an enemy. And it's being used against America in a huge way right now. Along with Locus of Control and other manipulation factors... the enemy is upon us. Big time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80635148 Netherlands 05/05/2022 06:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82641087 Russia 05/05/2022 06:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. Every single thing you wrote is utter nonsense. Congratulations. Stay in denial, faggot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80635148 Netherlands 05/05/2022 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80635148 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. Every single thing you wrote is utter nonsense. Congratulations. Stay in denial, faggot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80960309 United States 05/05/2022 06:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. correct |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76091990 Australia 05/05/2022 06:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76091990 You're right. It seems like you were talking about physical conflicts where people die and trillions are wasted protecting poppy fields. I was talking about demoralizing enemy combatants by using propaganda into non combative protesting before actual conflict. I'm willing to admit I was wrong due to inexperience, if you're willing to admit we're just looking at things differently. What about an agreement to disagree? But you are talking about two kinds of war. The war which causes people to die and trillions to be wasted doesn't involve any actual loss to that mindset. These are private interests being protected and making money, not the US economy. The second kind of war is largely conducted against people who are opposed to the first, both foreign and domestic. Now if I object to my people dying and the coffers of my country being drained to benefit a select few who have highly questionable loyalty to the country doing their fighting, this makes me an 'enemy' of my country. So both versions mean our country/all countries are only the vehicle for special interests and our military are in every case a mercenary class. In that case, trauma is definitely useful. Rapists and slave-dealers think the same thing. I thought that AC 8286 was talking about physical war, whereas I assumed with Twatter blowing up we were in a digital war. One it seemed he didn't think was real war because nobody died. That was the underlining theme of our disagreement. It's ok for people to disagree because opinions are like bums, everyone's got one and this is the internet. Militaries are useful and so are the people that are in them. However it takes a very naive or immoral person to question whether those militaries should be used in foreign policy. Either the naive person believes the military shouldn't be used to aggrandize wealthy people like the Sacklers who bribe politicians for those lucrative Government contracts. Or the immoral person knows it and profits from it by owning corporate stock who would do well in the event of conflict. Shouldn't be used, or wouldn't be used? Hmmm... I don't think it matters to be honest. We both know the political class invests in defense contractors 6 to 12 months before declaring some random country or non state actor to be an enemy of the people with the media pushing the population into demanding their state go bomb some poor hapless person who has no idea why his corn field suddenly exploded... You know I'm right! Lulcatz |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76091990 Australia 05/05/2022 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” Quoting: Agent 99 Art of War. This is a prime example of Asymmetrical Warfare. Using psychological methods to breakdown an enemy. And it's being used against America in a huge way right now. Along with Locus of Control and other manipulation factors... the enemy is upon us. Big time. I recall some random person making the debate about the prospect of being in a digital war, but for the life of me I can't remember which AC said it... :p |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76817319 United States 05/05/2022 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76817319 But you are talking about two kinds of war. The war which causes people to die and trillions to be wasted doesn't involve any actual loss to that mindset. These are private interests being protected and making money, not the US economy. The second kind of war is largely conducted against people who are opposed to the first, both foreign and domestic. Now if I object to my people dying and the coffers of my country being drained to benefit a select few who have highly questionable loyalty to the country doing their fighting, this makes me an 'enemy' of my country. So both versions mean our country/all countries are only the vehicle for special interests and our military are in every case a mercenary class. In that case, trauma is definitely useful. Rapists and slave-dealers think the same thing. I thought that AC 8286 was talking about physical war, whereas I assumed with Twatter blowing up we were in a digital war. One it seemed he didn't think was real war because nobody died. That was the underlining theme of our disagreement. It's ok for people to disagree because opinions are like bums, everyone's got one and this is the internet. Militaries are useful and so are the people that are in them. However it takes a very naive or immoral person to question whether those militaries should be used in foreign policy. Either the naive person believes the military shouldn't be used to aggrandize wealthy people like the Sacklers who bribe politicians for those lucrative Government contracts. Or the immoral person knows it and profits from it by owning corporate stock who would do well in the event of conflict. Shouldn't be used, or wouldn't be used? Hmmm... I don't think it matters to be honest. We both know the political class invests in defense contractors 6 to 12 months before declaring some random country or non state actor to be an enemy of the people with the media pushing the population into demanding their state go bomb some poor hapless person who has no idea why his corn field suddenly exploded... You know I'm right! Lulcatz I guess. I was just trying to parse out your immoral/naive dichotomy. It would seem that anyone not in the master class would be a member of solely those two groups. Partisans of all stripes in private conversations have usually either said 'it's good business' (right) or 'if you're going to make an omelet' (left). They've gotten more nuanced recently but I'm old now and not especially invested outside of trying to figure out what the point of it all is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79396793 United States 05/05/2022 06:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ElleMira
User ID: 76494359 United States 05/05/2022 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” Quoting: Agent 99 Art of War. This is a prime example of Asymmetrical Warfare. Using psychological methods to breakdown an enemy. And it's being used against America in a huge way right now. Along with Locus of Control and other manipulation factors... the enemy is upon us. Big time. 16 mos into this Biden globalist shitshow and it's been one PsyOps after another... https://imgur.com/IBPA0ct |
ElleMira
User ID: 76494359 United States 05/05/2022 06:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLPtards: "Noooo this isn't right! Only Russia is allowed to use propaganda and psychological warfare!" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83111707 No bigger tards then those who think GLP is pro Russia. That noone likes western cooks and creeps has nothing to do with Russia. Please take another booster. LOL!!!!!!!!! This site has been nothing but pro Russian bullshit for the last three months. Notice there are never any pro-Ukraine posts pinned, only pro-Russia. Even the admin himself made a topic about supporting Russia a couple weeks ago. Not everyone here is pro Putin. I am not pro Putin. I've never been pro Putin and believe he's just as much a part of this bullshit war as everyone else orchestrating it. |
Agent 99
User ID: 77082640 United States 05/05/2022 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” Quoting: Agent 99 Art of War. This is a prime example of Asymmetrical Warfare. Using psychological methods to breakdown an enemy. And it's being used against America in a huge way right now. Along with Locus of Control and other manipulation factors... the enemy is upon us. Big time. I recall some random person making the debate about the prospect of being in a digital war, but for the life of me I can't remember which AC said it... :p indeed. We are being hit in all directions. And while the bullets are bouncing off for now... how long will that last? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78997837 South Africa 05/05/2022 06:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Talking of psychological warfare, there's nothing real about this Ukraine war shit... Quoting: Tess. https://twitter.com/_/status/1521581530447065090 FECK! that is fake news!! Um, huurh, it's REAL I tell you, Um,FAAAAAK! |
Agent 99
User ID: 77082640 United States 05/05/2022 06:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” Quoting: Agent 99 Art of War. This is a prime example of Asymmetrical Warfare. Using psychological methods to breakdown an enemy. And it's being used against America in a huge way right now. Along with Locus of Control and other manipulation factors... the enemy is upon us. Big time. 16 mos into this Biden globalist shitshow and it's been one PsyOps after another... https://imgur.com/IBPA0ct exactly. and this is why he won/stole the election. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82121352 United States 05/05/2022 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76091990 Australia 05/05/2022 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76091990 I thought that AC 8286 was talking about physical war, whereas I assumed with Twatter blowing up we were in a digital war. One it seemed he didn't think was real war because nobody died. That was the underlining theme of our disagreement. It's ok for people to disagree because opinions are like bums, everyone's got one and this is the internet. Militaries are useful and so are the people that are in them. However it takes a very naive or immoral person to question whether those militaries should be used in foreign policy. Either the naive person believes the military shouldn't be used to aggrandize wealthy people like the Sacklers who bribe politicians for those lucrative Government contracts. Or the immoral person knows it and profits from it by owning corporate stock who would do well in the event of conflict. Shouldn't be used, or wouldn't be used? Hmmm... I don't think it matters to be honest. We both know the political class invests in defense contractors 6 to 12 months before declaring some random country or non state actor to be an enemy of the people with the media pushing the population into demanding their state go bomb some poor hapless person who has no idea why his corn field suddenly exploded... You know I'm right! Lulcatz I guess. I was just trying to parse out your immoral/naive dichotomy. It would seem that anyone not in the master class would be a member of solely those two groups. Partisans of all stripes in private conversations have usually either said 'it's good business' (right) or 'if you're going to make an omelet' (left). They've gotten more nuanced recently but I'm old now and not especially invested outside of trying to figure out what the point of it all is. I'm somewhat of an oddity. I don't understand most of what goes on in my life, but I think there's a lot more weird stuff than I realize. The fact of the matter is... 10,000 years ago, people discovered they could get stuff by trading it with other people. Then a particularly bright person decided to invent something other people didn't have and call it "money". Which they'd give people and exchange it for stuff. Like a trader would say to his customers, "Bring me a chicken and I'll give you this piece of silver you can give to my cousin who is a tailor and you'll be fashionable and impress ladies..." Then when the family of the trader married other families and then they used a form of barter involving their "money". Then the trader's family used their "money" to help "Princes" or the trader's relatives to buy armies and then the "Prince" made the trader's "money" "Legal Tender". And the trader's princely relatives fought over money and power until one day a "Prince" said... "Screw fighting; let's just own Earth." "We'll have one family! Ours! Who is rich and powerful like Earthly gods, and the peasants will eat opioids like candy..." "We'll have our kingdom of banks and the peasants will be happy and own nothing because we'll be the only people with property rights! Yay us!" And thus here we are in the 21st Century with our dark overlords called "The Elites", while we pray for cat food and our idiot boxes to tell us we're model Global Citizens for walking and not eating meat! That's history in a nutshell. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79780865 Canada 05/05/2022 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How does the bible put it? Something like "If satan be divided against satan, how shall his kingdom stand?" No one is easier to deceive than someone who is deceptive by nature. They may seem unified but a house divided is a heart without true empathy. So much ham fisted control, so much effort into propaganda, so much boasting and yes, arrogance. Decades of it. But a few decades is such a short amount of time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78960711 05/05/2022 06:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78960711 05/05/2022 06:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |