The Beatles: Get Back Part 1 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80433877 Singapore 11/25/2021 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80433877 Singapore 11/25/2021 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75150737 United States 11/25/2021 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its John who was the total professional. From the very start. It was his band after all. Lennon carried the band until they were able to fly off on their own. He sacrificed like a parent does for their kids. They abandoned John. Not the other way around. He got them to the point where they all thought they were bigger than him. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80433877 Singapore 11/25/2021 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81213646 Canada 11/25/2021 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dogfood™
User ID: 81229064 United States 11/25/2021 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dogfood™
User ID: 81229064 United States 11/25/2021 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5461667 United States 11/25/2021 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ringo was sad because Paul was dead. Look at the early footage of Paul, then there's a little break where they announced the Beatles wouldn't play out anymore, then the bearded, 3" taller, 20 pound heavier, old lady faced Faul is the rest of the show. (Paul and John were the same size, could wear each other's suits.) Billy could adopt anyone's singing style, his dad was a music professor, he was an accomplished pianist. He was a perfect stand in after some surgery. The three were demoralized. And may I introduce to you, the one and only Billy Shears and Sergeeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.. Faul was a good pianist- Paul was not. Faul made a string of cover singles under the name of Billy and the Pepper Pots. Don't bother trying to tell me otherwise, I've known this for 50 years now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73973130 United States 11/25/2021 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5461667 United States 11/25/2021 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is this on ? That would be if the first order if discussion is to be had. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73973130 Streamed over Disney+. Toward the end John wouldn't be quiet while George was trying to offer some input about an arrangement, so he QUIT THE BAND. Now that's demoralized. John and Paul were always belittling his contributions, being rich, he had f*** you money. |
TheRealRebel
User ID: 79357579 United States 11/25/2021 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5461667 United States 11/25/2021 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The narrator said (during some display of English papers headlines reading "Immigrant Invasion" and so on) that the song "Get Back" was in support of the immigrants. Here are the 'supportive' lyrics- [link to genius.com (secure)] No hint that it was about immigrants at all. Go see for yourself. Look at the UK now. It isn't British anymore. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81217765 United States 11/25/2021 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you can tell a Paul song from a john song...they really didnt write too much together since early days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81213646 i way prefer John songs....much more rock Paul lies a lot. Like him taking credit for things John did. Like the Erie ahhh. Aaahhaaa aaaahh. I’m in a day in the life. I have a huge collection of moggs, which separate the track out of old songs, And ive listened to just that part. And it’s John. There are more vocals going on in that part that you can hear in the full song. It is 100% John Lennon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77927952 Bulgaria 11/25/2021 06:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80433877 Singapore 11/25/2021 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is this on ? That would be if the first order if discussion is to be had. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73973130 Streamed over Disney+. Toward the end John wouldn't be quiet while George was trying to offer some input about an arrangement, so he QUIT THE BAND. Now that's demoralized. John and Paul were always belittling his contributions, being rich, he had f*** you money. He quit the band because he hated Paul for secretly going behind others backs and got more royalties. Which is what the song how do you sleep is about. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71669654 United States 11/25/2021 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you can tell a Paul song from a john song...they really didnt write too much together since early days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81213646 i way prefer John songs....much more rock Paul lies a lot. Like him taking credit for things John did. Like the Erie ahhh. Aaahhaaa aaaahh. I’m in a day in the life. I have a huge collection of moggs, which separate the track out of old songs, And ive listened to just that part. And it’s John. There are more vocals going on in that part that you can hear in the full song. It is 100% John Lennon. B.S. - John never, in any interviews, mentioned nor accused McCartney of wrongfully taking credit for things he did. |
RegalBeast
User ID: 79683548 United States 11/25/2021 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71669654 United States 11/25/2021 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is this on ? That would be if the first order if discussion is to be had. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73973130 Streamed over Disney+. Toward the end John wouldn't be quiet while George was trying to offer some input about an arrangement, so he QUIT THE BAND. Now that's demoralized. John and Paul were always belittling his contributions, being rich, he had f*** you money. He quit the band because he hated Paul for secretly going behind others backs and got more royalties. Which is what the song how do you sleep is about. Also B.S. - McCartney and Lennon split royalties between each other for songs they wrote, whether together or apart - they agreed to put both their names on as songwriters and split the money. George and Ringo got paid for what they wrote - all the Beatles split a the publishing equally after their management took a quarter share. How Do You Sleep is John just bitching about McCartney after the split - which later on, John said in interviews that the song wasn't really about McCartney, but was more accurately a reflection on himself. |
RegalBeast
User ID: 79683548 United States 11/25/2021 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RegalBeast
User ID: 79683548 United States 11/25/2021 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Paul lies a lot. Like him taking credit for things John did. Like the Erie ahhh. Aaahhaaa aaaahh. I’m in a day in the life. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81217765 I have a huge collection of moggs, which separate the track out of old songs, And ive listened to just that part. And it’s John. There are more vocals going on in that part that you can hear in the full song. It is 100% John Lennon. Sorry, no, it's NOT John it's actually Paul and Paul has never actually talked about that bit or falsely claimed it was him. Why would he need to? We all know the middle section of the song is Paul's baby. It wasn't just those few lines. You are letting the nasal quality and reverb fool you. Under all that is Paul sounding exactly like he did at the beginning of "Lovely Rita". At the very end of it where he brings it to a close you can clearly tell it is Paul. People think it's John because of the nasal tone and reverb without listening to it critically. There simply is no John voice there and I know their voices (talking, singing and clowning) like I know my friends and family's voices. I also always assumed it was John BEFORE actually hearing the isolation and Holy Cow it's really Paul doing a John imitation. John could have never pulled that off anyways. Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 11/25/2021 06:35 PM |
Dogfood™
User ID: 81229064 United States 11/25/2021 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wish I could see this! Quoting: RegalBeast The last episode should be epic with the rooftop performance. [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81221279 Australia 11/25/2021 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dogfood™
User ID: 81229064 United States 11/25/2021 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80573488 United States 11/25/2021 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ringo was sad because Paul was dead. Look at the early footage of Paul, then there's a little break where they announced the Beatles wouldn't play out anymore, then the bearded, 3" taller, 20 pound heavier, old lady faced Faul is the rest of the show. (Paul and John were the same size, could wear each other's suits.) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5461667 Billy could adopt anyone's singing style, his dad was a music professor, he was an accomplished pianist. He was a perfect stand in after some surgery. The three were demoralized. And may I introduce to you, the one and only Billy Shears and Sergeeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.. Faul was a good pianist- Paul was not. Faul made a string of cover singles under the name of Billy and the Pepper Pots. Don't bother trying to tell me otherwise, I've known this for 50 years now. I could agree more, but I just get on a tear with it. It is obvious what happened and that Paul was changed and then they couldn't tour, and then they broke up. Green-eyed Faul is different than dark brown-eyed Paul. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80573488 United States 11/25/2021 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Paul was obviously a better business man, and had the songwriting nack of being able to consistently pump out the commercial hits even in the 80's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81221279 He had at least 6 mega hits on the Billboard charts in this decade Which wouldn't have on their own. You know that. It's coattails of the Beatles fame. Without that Wings ain't quite shite. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80347152 United States 11/25/2021 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ringo was sad because Paul was dead. Look at the early footage of Paul, then there's a little break where they announced the Beatles wouldn't play out anymore, then the bearded, 3" taller, 20 pound heavier, old lady faced Faul is the rest of the show. (Paul and John were the same size, could wear each other's suits.) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5461667 Billy could adopt anyone's singing style, his dad was a music professor, he was an accomplished pianist. He was a perfect stand in after some surgery. The three were demoralized. And may I introduce to you, the one and only Billy Shears and Sergeeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.. Faul was a good pianist- Paul was not. Faul made a string of cover singles under the name of Billy and the Pepper Pots. Don't bother trying to tell me otherwise, I've known this for 50 years now. They believe what they see on teeveeee. No use trying to educate them. |
TheRealRebel
User ID: 79357579 United States 11/25/2021 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80202486 United States 11/25/2021 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheRealRebel
User ID: 79357579 United States 11/25/2021 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The narrator said (during some display of English papers headlines reading "Immigrant Invasion" and so on) that the song "Get Back" was in support of the immigrants. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5461667 Here are the 'supportive' lyrics- [link to genius.com (secure)] No hint that it was about immigrants at all. Go see for yourself. Look at the UK now. It isn't British anymore. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75150737 United States 11/25/2021 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Paul was obviously a better business man, and had the songwriting nack of being able to consistently pump out the commercial hits even in the 80's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81221279 He had at least 6 mega hits on the Billboard charts in this decade Nope. Thread: None of Paul McCartney post-Beatle work rises to the level of the Beatles |