Notes from an 'Alternate Universe': The Return of the Blue Kachina

Out of my pay scale, chain of command ask Chaol :)

Last Edited by SpawnX on 09/07/2021 01:49 AM

Curious. Why do you think life is a waiting game?

How did you come to that realisation?

>Be Absolute
>Be unable to perceive of yourself
>Forget yourself in order to experience the illusion of separation
>Now you can relate to yourself, or appear to
>Now you can 'perceive' of yourself

In order for the trick to work you must forget that you are that which cannot actually be perceived, or be at all

It's an interesting game.

Well, now that I think about it, it’s more of a hypothesis that I’m attempting to experiment on (excuse my poor English). It stems from my understanding of your advice(?) or maybe suggestion of incorporating more dreamlike elements into my waking world.
Basically, I think (hence hypothesis) a dreamlike experience for a day may be more relative if I get up immediately and ‘get going’ iykwim. But we only experience what is most relative (all things considered) and I’m not much of a morning person so I tend to spend up to 30mins still in bed when I wake up. Trying to get rid of that and that’s why I asked. (Keep in mind that I recognize other factors which may not directly be related to that but when worked on, might make such experience more relative)

So... any tips?

To add to that, what’s spawn’s definition of a waiting game?

Lol. The amount of preliminary reading/understanding one needs to have done to get this amuses me. Or maybe just a powerful imagination is enough to grasp this concept. I think I’ve noticed just one person (excluding chaol) in these threads who does.
It’s hilarious

Fukushima poses no harm? lies.

You want to make a dream you are having more relative to your waking experience, is that correct?

Keep in mind that the thing you are dreaming about is probably already interpreted in your more physical reality. A book about a voyage to India that you're reading in more physical reality could be nicely reflected in your dream experience as a dinner table, for example. (The reflection would be a reflection because the geometry of relationships are the same but interpreted as two seemingly-different things depending on the mechanism of perception.)

On one hand, dreams are a way to process 'physical reality'. On the other hand, physical experiences are a way to process dreams and the two experiences are the same. You are in 'both worlds' simultaneously and dreaming all the time.

A good 30% is just me saying the same thing over and over in different ways.

1. The Absolute is beyond any perspective and, thus, is beyond the ability to be perceived.

2. To exist is to relate to something else. But how does the Absolute relate to anything else? It doesn't, but can pretend to by mirroring itself and forgetting it is the reflection.

3. This primary relationship is: Chaos and Order. Chaos being the reflection that was 'created' and Order being its contraction.

4. The process is recursive, and these endless relationships illustrate everything that can possibly exist.

That's it. There is nothing more.

Nuclear chain reactions are not what Wikipedia tells you it is. It is different.

The Fukushima event was war theatre, with a stage, actors, script, etc. There were various benefits, including the type of land reclamation that is going on in other places (like California).

Such events occur endlessly. It's how governments work to manage populations in a scientific way.

The only chain reaction that occurred was a social one. It helped to 'set off the current timeline', for lack of better words.

Lol. Some guy named Alinsky once pointed out how ‘people’ react when presented with something outside of their experience or something to that sort.
I’m guessing you know that already. Every word is well thought-out according to a certain paradigm. I presume a certain system (method of relaying information/the way you speak [among other things]) which may or may not be related to filtration (of what? lol) is present in this paradigm, isn’t it? Lol

Bro why do you care? Smh

I could think life is a waiting game in a moment and many more moments. I can't tell you what I was thinking 5 days ago. What about 5 years ago. 'Life is a game' a fundamental thought that I hold dear to my being?

(note: the original statement was proposed as a question to myself or whomever, as follows, Is life a waiting game, not, Life is a waiting game...)

If I had to answer the question, 'Why do you think life is a waiting game?'

I found myself thinking as a thinker does. There might actually be a human with a relationship with a entity who possess powerful psychic abilities. Now I didn't think much of how to replicate such a relationship but instead poke the genii pockets and see if some coins fall my way. I may remember you saying 'Life is a game that people take very serious.' Find out what they take serious and profit off of it.

As of late, countless of ideas approach me to use deception tactics to gain traction. Meta fiction not so much but deceptive acting seems to be flourishing in my mind. I don't know if I actually take action, but the ideas are entertaining!

I could also respond with a philosophical response how life is a game and how its not but at that point, just depends if I want to entertain myself, maybe next time.

In short, some interactions with how I interpret certain words of yours and other interactions in life.

There is some value in seeing life as a game, but a "waiting game" would imply a different approach, as if reality depends on something outside of your own interpretation. We would only be waiting for ourselves to interpret.

Why am I seeing/thinking/dreaming these words/thoughts/representations?
What else could I see/think/dream in its stead?

I'm putting together the "Superhumanism" page on the website before others in the schedule. It represents what will be, perhaps, the most difficult pill to swallow.

If anyone is interested in something that may evoke extreme cognitive dissonance, please voice your opinion here. Not for the curiosity but for the change. It is time.

If not, that is fine, too. Perhaps I will put a giant disclaimer on it if I make the page public.

Go ahead bro.

Please continue

I’m interested, curious and ready for the change :)

So, you might not make it public?! That would be a bummer.

Hopefully, it’s a ‘when’ not an ‘if’.

Very interested. Please go on!

Please do.

Interested, please do.

If you truly believe this, then I feel (might not be fact) that you’re missing a huge part of what chaol’s been trying to relay all these years lol.

Maybe attempting to truly understand the term, “logical narrative” might help.

Last Edited by Eruterio on 09/15/2021 01:31 PM

Care to enlighten the class on this huge part he’s missing.

Thanks in advance.

Can I ask for a delay for this cognitive dissonance please? The last roll out of cognitive dissonance turned many cats away. I cannot even look at the new pics of Megan Fox without my pee-pee inverting back in my tummy.

These guys that want the new leads on cognitive dissonance are basically asking to be front row on a roller coaster without seat belts on. Only soooo many are gonna be able to hang on and stick around after the ride.

Builder-guy, are you sure we need another red pill? Neo in resurrections been chomping down blue pills left and right.

You are losing veterans here and the front line noobies think it's all fun and games.

He's been relaying a tiny section of his personal journal to reflections of whom he could of been. Luckily for us our electronic impulses in our brain are firing in a random order that lets us be entertained over the years.