See this now and wake up. . . . MOON LANDING CUT SCENES FILMED IN NEVADA DESERT. . .now you know it's fake!

Look, I don't know what your angle is and I don't care, like those people bellyaching about the "holocaust", I have no interest in your horseshit.
If you want to believe a guy that killed the entire planet because SOME HUMANS flipped him the bird, AND THEN killed his own son is god, have at it. I think you have shit for brains.

You can worship whatever crazy assed demon god you want to, but when that cocksucker starts telling you to kill me or anyone else , then we are going to have a problem

Are we good?

I have not mentioned any "god" or "gods", so not sure where you are getting that from. I don't worship any god/s, thanks, ace. No angles here.

I pointed out that ships can be brought back into view with a strong enough camera or telescope, thus negating the claim that ships "disappear behind a curve".

That is the actual flight path...shows flight path does not have to be to scale lol

You are making a claim you seem to no little about.....Dunning–Kruger!

I happen to know a few people personally who were involved, behind who have spilled their guts, and shortly after had some kind of untimely demise. I also know many involved have signaled to us that it was a hoax, including Armstrong himself.


Not many involved had to know what was really going on.
They launched a big rocket into space, thats all most of them actually knew.

No, it is not you blithering fucktard

More YouTube nonsense the boat was already visible and not gone over the curve yet why don't the film a boat travelling away from them and keep filming till it vanishes.

Using flat earth logic with powerful telescope from top of skyscraper you should be able to always see the moon and sun and the whole earth.

Before you state something like the atmosphere would block you, think about this. Stars are visible on the horizon and they further away than anything on earth.....

Look, I don't know what your angle is and I don't care, like those people bellyaching about the "holocaust", I have no interest in your horseshit.



Make your own thread about the flathead thee -roy

You should be able to see France on a clear day

Yes it is, read the Flight plan I posted the whole thing.

maybe you cant understand it....

we never went to the moon

Methinks you are confusing things. Here on earth, we have an atmosphere. Not sure why you don't get that. Stars are irrelevant.

But the video clearly shows several instances of people documenting proof of seeing distances over 243 miles away on earth. Simply not possible on a globe.

The official math just doesn't add up. But believe what you will.

The video actually shows men photographing from Andorra to a point well into inland France, 243 miles away.

This man and his family were ran over by a train after he presented a report to congress claiming the Apollo program was a fraud , a expensive piece of shit, and would never reach the moon:


Here is NASA official rendition of events:
[you have to put the letters "ar" where I have asterisks because this forum bans the name of the ex-presidents son, which happens to be the same]
...
[link to history.nasa.gov (secure)] › Apollo204 › b**ron


Ba**n was a rank and file inspector at Kennedy from September 1965 until November 1966, when he asked for and received a leave of absence.





Now here is the truth: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
Death
Six days after his testimony, B**on was killed instantly, along with his wife and stepdaughter, when a train crashed into their car near their home in Florida.[1][7] B**on's death, which was witnessed by a woman, was later ruled as an accident, with no suspicion of foul play

I bet that woman has a villa in Switzerland too.

Dont let the government shills derail the thread with flat earth horseshit

I understood it more than you are capable of when I was about 6 or 7.

Yes I know the Earth has atmoSPHERE I even stated it in my post. Maybe you can read it next time, or maybe it's understanding that's the problem. Stars are irrelevant? Yes flat Earthers like to dismiss the fact earth has two pole stars, two points of rotation that doesn't work on a flat plane.

The Vid is Trash and not documented proof of anything they get debunked all the time because their math is wrong and refraction caused by the atmosphere.

"The “eight inches per mile squared” is a rule of thumb to determine the drop height due to the curvature of the Earth. It does not account for the observer’s height and atmospheric refraction. And therefore, the rule is unsuitable to determine the amount of obstruction of a distant object due to Earth’s curvature"

You already know the AC is an idiot since they designated bandwidth in Megabytes and not Megabits. Even further on, Satellite comms are usually measured in a "Symbol Rate" and the effective bandwidth varies depending on factors like Forward Error Correction.

One thing I noticed is how people tend to say "we" hen discussing whether NASA really did go to the moon, and THAT is the key to understanding WHY it was done, and why Russia didn't blab.

The idea was to instill in humanity that it was all of us together reaching another world, so now we need a world government.


G for GLOBALISM

And it worked magnificently , even the Veit Kong said "We".



It was either a collective success or a collective failure on humanities part, and for some reason people prefer to think "We" did succeed



get it?

You seem not to have studied orbital mechanics, maybe you need something more to your level...

As has already been explained to you, there is no "angle".

Hope that helps.

SO was 500 kilohertz enough bandwidth , or not? I am an idiot because I wrote megabyte in place of megabit?

Hmmm Hmm.



No matter how you pick apart my posts looking for inconsequential errors, in the end NASA failed to include the thermal energy of the moon in it's link budget signal to noise calculations and they can't explain how they transmitted all of that data simultaneously with 500 kilohertz of bandwidth because even a little kid can tell you why it isnt possible in todays world.

Uhhhh... The TV broadcast was not digital. 500Kbps is actually plenty for a digitally compressed 480i broadcast anyways.

No thanks shit for brains.

OK, so give us the proper math for determining "curvature".

Not the "rule of thumb". As for stars, they pretty much debunk a "spinning" globe hurtling thru the galaxy.

This leaves us with 2 possibilities; you either know the globe, spinning earth theory doesn't stack up,

Or, 2, you know it doesn't compute and are just shilling.

(And the moon videos are quite frankly, pathetic, that any high school audio/video club could cook up over a weekend)

Kubrick did make a fake moon landing film though.

Wrong: — 2.3 Mbit/sec. NTSC (480i/p)


No. And they were digital:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Ok where you data for The path you believe you think they took.

Why are the moon and the sun round but supposedly the earth isn't?

Seriously, you can get yourself a good telescope and see the shit on the moon surface yourself if you want.

One thing that separates a smart person from a stupid one is knowing what to filter out as useless or unreliable information, and what to actually commit to memory as a useful fact

In this case a YouTube video by some jackoff that probably failed 7th grade science

Digital?

ROFL