Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

John Lennon was still performing Beatles songs (as a Lennon impersonator) until a few months ago when he died.

I think the best that Bob Joyce could do would be to have one final performance as Elvis (as impersonated by Bob Joyce). I think many of these people want to come out, at least the ones that are still performing.

funny.. Lennon also played himself in a film where a couple of students "...discover a long thought to be dead rock icon living in a remote part of Canada. It all begins when Tim discovers a clip of an old man playing guitar on a tape found jammed inside an old video camera his father gave him."



Some of them just can't resist, I guess.

Do you really believe that?

The Elites are a good bit of the population too. People in prominent positions with families that live in society too. We’re all in this same boat together. Do they really want to eat food contaminated with chemicals? Uptake Hormone disrupters from all over the environment from food, to cleaning products, to microplastics in the water - that no one escapes?

Is this acceptable to them? Don’t they want peace and happiness too? Why don’t they make a move? Be role models in the way that the world actually needs? Set a precedent. Show how it can be done. Sometimes people just need to see it modeled in a real way to begin to understand how to apply it in their own lives.

I hear you. Start small. In your own domain. With the people you love the most. Have it scale in your own life first. And then see where it goes.

But in the big picture of society at large, will it ever be enough to get the Elites to mirror peace for the masses? Or do you just have to learn to be ok with leaving others behind?

The way you tell it, the Elites just do whatever the public wants. Don’t they care about the repercussions of their own actions and the roles that they play? The world they’re molding for their own children? Isn’t this something that most of them should wake up to? Or is that they’re riding high on the hog without a care in the world about the reality they are reinforcing? Validating?

I don’t know Anthony. Are the Elites really just a benevolent class doing as they’re asked while they line their pockets and sometimes fleece ours?

If they stopped servicing our need for annihilation, what would happen? Isn’t it also their need for it too?

Can’t it be both - a business decision and an evil conspiracy? Hormone disrupters shouldn’t be everywhere and in everything. Who thought that was a good idea?

All of these chemicals came from somewhere and ended up in our food, water, environment. And then our bodies. Wrecking havoc. Why are they there? Whose idea was it and for what purpose? Did they not think the consequences through or what?

It sure falls right in line with the gender-bending nature of the reality being pushed and celebrated.

It seems deliberate.

Have you ever tried to grow your own food? Enough to cover your daily needs for an extended period of time? It’s a ton of work. A full time job really.

I think it’s easy to sit there and say this. But the reality is you need resources to make something like this feasible. Good soil, fertilizer, plenty of good water, space, time, favorable environmental conditions depending on where you live.

Growing enough food to feed a family also takes knowledge. And a green thumb which not everyone has.

You would have to re-educate people for them to not be reliant on the food industry. This set-up is generationally deep. My parents never had a garden. Going to the store to buy food is all I ever knew until I was in my 20’s.

It’s not as easy as you’re making it sound.

Speaking from experience here.

So let me get this straight, if I don’t look at labels, I don’t care about what I put in my body. But if I do look at labels, I’m being reminded of what a lazy person I am. Got it!

For me, I look at labels to ensure I’m getting what I think I’m getting. Too many ingredients with names I can’t pronounce get passed by. It’s better than not looking at all!

And here we get back to the question of freewill.

Aren’t things of all manners being forced upon the population.

Can this really sustain? Do we really want it to?

It feels like the subconscious is driving the self-annihilation tendencies. How can something most people aren’t even conscious of be addressed meaningfully?

I suspect, attention hasn’t been brought in the ‘right’ way or articulated in a way that most can relate to that helps it to be seen more clearly.

How else do you shine a light and show people they’re being brought “to the edge of the logical narrative of their choices.”?

I think you’re painting with a broad brush here. You haven’t really hung out with low-income Americans in a while I think. I have. The ones I know work their asses off. Raise their families on minimal pay. Have very little time to grow a garden or make healthy snacks from scratch. They use Foodstamps and Wic to close the gap. All the while, doing the best they can to provide a stable, loving environment for their children.

I’m sure you’re right though about mismanaging resources to a certain extent. I think most are guilty of that these days. I don’t know anyone that doesn’t own a smartphone. Or pay for entertainment in one way or an other. Out here, you wouldn’t survive without a vehicle of some kind. This is the world we are in now. And we do make our choices - prioritizing phone, internet and all the other modern “necessities” we think we need. “Keeping up with the Joneses” drives modern society.

All I’m trying to say is that, being stressed about money can take a huge toll on one’s being. Whether good at managing it or not, living in the margins can wear one down and cloud one’s thinking.

99% of your readers are not looking for billions of dollars. We are seeking fuel to hack reality. The main hack would be owning enough dollars to exchange for new ownership of a home without a mortgage, to focus on building a local family. And with the fuel, there I am spelling it out. Ez

"As you 'change,' your reality (and others) do, as well."

Your ever-evolving change has not reached the level of satisfaction from your most dear readers. I could delve into perceived fouls and misdirections, but the ball is still in play. Why haven't you made the choice and change for the perceived benefits of your dearest readers?

Now we can say we are still in the process of your change, and you are altering your choices such as inversions and other methods, in hopes to finally reach _________.

[link to www.thetimes.co.uk (secure)]

What information do you have on his hog? How does the Man of the Year keep his hog from being seen in public?

It is not that people want to do this consciously but end up doing it because of the choices they make. Other things become more of a priority.

For example, someone saying they do not want smart cities or smart this or smart that, while having used credit cards and online shopping services for decades. Would they expect the path of development to just stop where they are comfortable?

Do the Elites eat food contaminated with chemicals? Of course, because it is the easier choice.

Consume hormone disruptors? Of course, because it is the easier choice.

These harmful things are a result of the kind of world we have chosen, and continue to choose.

Mostly ignored, just as we all do because we don't think we can do anything about it.

The modern world DEMANDS those and similar chemicals. They are economic and business decisions, not put there because Elites want to harm people.

People are only talking about the LATEST hormone disruptor because the Elites are pushing it in their media. What about the other preservatives that have caused even more hormone disruption?

Is it a hormone disruptor or a preservative that has many side effects, one of which is hormone disruption?


Are they not all ready showing that by being productive, being masters of their reality as much as they can, and creating some kind of value for society?

We are assuming that they do not show how things can be done.

All the information is there for us. Does the average Joe publish that information? Does the average Joe care to tell others about it, or assume that there's nothing that can be done?

Generally speaking, it is the Elite population that informs, not the general public. People are perfectly welcome to inform others of things, but they generally do not (beyond layers 1 and 2).

Would any member of the public DARE to repeat that an estimated 72 million babies are killed by their parents each year? Would this not be a major concern? Why does not everyone know this? Where is the outrage? People do not want to think about it, because they generally prefer to ignore reality.

Does the average Joe think they're just a victim of their own reality? Or circumstances, perhaps? There is nothing that can be done? Are they sure?

We cannot force people to choose health, peace, prosperity, happiness, and a better life, et c.

How many of us do things on a daily basis that we know we 'should not'? If we know those simple things well, what effect would hearing the same thing in media have? People would not really care.

We would never know the answer to that unless we try.

All it takes is about 15-20% of the population.

But good people stand by and do nothing, for the most part. They're too busy theorising, complaining, thinking there's nothing that can be done or should be done, demoralising others from acting, and so much else.


It needs to be worth the time and effort, like it would be for most anyone else.

Profit (including financial) can be gained from giving people what they want, not from giving people what they do not want.


Of course.

But it is the best viable system we have until something better comes along.

But... does not the Public?


The same questions can be asked of the Public, but perhaps the reasons are the same.

Both populations are ignorant of the greater reality.


What I have been saying is that they're not nearly as evil, or bad, as most would assume. The reality is different than our assumptions.

Most of the evils are fictions.

Further, I've illustrated why the fictions are necessary.

They are not 'doing as they're asked' so much as giving the Public what is needed for the kind of world people choose. The modern world.


The Public has much less of a desire/need to be productive, to be curious, to defy authority, and to work against consensus, so it could be said that, although the path to self-destruction is in both populations, it is much stronger in the general Public; the greater force that steers the path of civilisation.

Or we could just say, "The Elites are controlling everything! There's nothing that can be done except complain and suffer." as so many do.

If you prefer to see it as an evil conspiracy that is certainly your choice, but why would you want it to be?

Consider the following.

Many/most women know that the makeup they apply to their skin (if they do such) contain harmful chemicals. Some even know that they disrupt their endocrine system. Yet, they continue to use those products.

No one is forcing them to use them. No one forces people to consume the endless products that are laden with harmful sugars. The list of harms that people know about -- and continue to ignore -- goes on and on.

We ignore the harm that people want to do to themselves and, instead, place that intention upon others rather than the person who chooses it over other, less harmful products.

"But those other products don't work as well."

Precisely. That's the attraction of Chaos.

So, who thought it was a good idea? More importantly, who continues to think it is a good idea every time they use them?

The modern world demands it.

What happens when you take away the preservatives in products, for example? Where would most people then get their food?

Processed food is harmful. It is misplaced for us to assume that the company making it wants to harm us. That would just be living in fear.

The things we put onto our skin are FAR MORE HARMFUL, again. Endocrine disrupting chemicals in parabens are in so many consumer products, interfering with the body's hormones and so much more. Not to mention the damage to one's pineal gland.

An other logical narrative...

1) The products we use can sexually confuse the biology of the people who use them.

2) As the technology in the products becomes more 'advanced' (via competition in the marketplace) so does the potential for harm.

3) As a person becomes sexually confused their thoughts and actions also become sexually confused.

4) The person who is now sexually confused may be someone whose job it is to produce media, such as commercials or television programs.

5) The people who generally avoid certain lifestyle choices are not generally the ones producing the media, writing and making music, designing and programming games, and so on. They generally prefer other types of vocations.

The people who _______ are not the ones who ________.

If you put car mechanics in charge of the hospital nursery, don't be surprised when there are some serious booboos. We should not assume it is deliberate, though.

I do believe you're beginning to see how people make choices that aren't necessarily better for them and others, but choices that they feel they need to make in order to survive or prosper.

You know this intuitively, right? It's obvious.

Now hold that thought...

Some of those people own businesses and run corporations.

Can we apply the same to a small business?

How about a very large business?

"It’s not as easy as you’re making it sound," you say. My point exactly.

"Making healthy foods for millions is not as easy as it sounds"

Do you see how it is about the same thing, at scale?

The harmful chemicals founds in foods are not there because they are harmful. They are there because market forces demand them to be there, much like market forces might drive one to buy a can of vegetables instead of growing their own.


Here's a question... is it possible that the sugar in a product is, say, 10x or more harmful than all of the hormone disruptors in it?

I'm suggesting that it would not be too difficult for many people to use and consume foods (and products) without labels, or products with very basic ingredients.

But what do people do about the products with ingredients they know are harmful (or, at least, ingredients they could be more familiar with) but continue to use?


The way a food product is processed should also be on the deck, I think.

In order for me to understand more clearly before I respond, can you provide your best example of this?


Do most people not often consciously choose things they know to be harmful in some way to them and/or their loved ones?


If so many of us continue to choose things that harm ourselves, there is all ready enough light on it.

In the big scheme of things we are the ones producing the harms.

We are the Elite, and the Public.

Last Edited by The Builder on 03/08/2024 11:18 AM

Could we say that they are in their respective situations because of choices they have made?

Yes, that's a very broad brush. It might apply to just about everyone.

When I talk about such people I'm also talking about the people that came before us who thought they needed to make similar choices.

To 'keep up' with society, or just to do what they thought was needed.

But the memory of being low-income is firmly etched into my mind, as are the attempted kidnappings, stray bullets flying into our home an inch above my grandmother's head, and other fun things that many others who are working hard to pay the bills have never had the pleasure of experiencing.

The conditions of our reality are all in the way that we think about it. It took me a while to figure that out and become a master of my reality.

We don't need to keep up with anyone, of course. But the pressure is strong enough to consider it a necessity for most/all of us.

But could the people you are talking about also have mismanaged their time and resources?

For example, instead of spending a good chunk of money to buy a house for themselves and pay interest for so many years, could they have bought a multi-family property, instead, and lived in one of the less-desirable units? Did they really need that _______ or need to spend so much a month on ________?

A full 20% of Americans become rich at some point in their lives. What people do with their resources is up to them, of course.

An even greater percentage have the resources to do something that could financially sustain them for years to come, but choose not to. Perhaps they prefer to take holidays, buy a boat, or big-screen television, or whatever.

I've never met anyone who I thought would turn it down. But, I digress. The few I have asked would mostly set up foundations and give it to charity, however.

It could be said that even more than 99% are not looking for free bitcoin like somebody I know :)


No hacks are needed for those. They're nice things to have, especially the family part.


I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.

Very, very few readers actually post, but are you speaking of your own life or the lives of others?


Could you provide one example of each? I am a curious George...


Here, are you assuming that the 'change' would be something that you would desire?

Who are these 'dearest readers' you speak of? You? I ask because I am wondering how you know what they're thinking. Did you read my little red book!?!

What I am hearing is, "Why haven't you given me what I want all these years?" I'm probably mistaken, but please help me understand with greater clarity what you're saying.

Curious, though... if I could change your life in a very dramatic way, may I? I would not need your permission, of course, but you would at least know that you are getting what you asked for.

May I?

It might be interesting to see what kind of 'change' I would imagine for you. If such a think could be done, of course.


The toilet. Ahhh....

He doesn't want you to know, that's why. Others do or do not care to stop the public from knowing about them, which is the difference.

I'm not too familiar with all of his family but he is one of the more convincing ones. Kylie is probably the least convincing, but I have not taken a close look at the others. Kanye is probably the most.

That’s my point. Food isn’t even food anymore. From the sugar to the fat to the salt to the preservatives to the fillers and on and on. I’m not trying to isolate just the disrupters. I’m saying the whole system is rotten. If your bread doesn’t mold pretty quickly, then you probably shouldn’t be eating it.

It’s insidious how many chemicals have seeped into our lives on the daily. Life is a chemical onslaught. My point is about why the chemicals of all types were ever introduced into food, air, water, products, etc? They had to have known there would be very real repercussions. Why put it in the products to begin with? People choose from products that are presented to them. Did they ask for the newest chemical concoction?

Whether intentional or not, mainstream foods and other products have been weaponized against the natural functioning of the human body. Also products we put on our bodies. The water we drink.

They’ve turned most people into professional patients. Look at all the young people dying from Colon cancer now. Diabetes. Asthma. Et c. We don’t know why, they say. I call bullshit.

Maybe it didn’t begin like this, but it’s where we’re at. Maybe it wasn’t intentionally done to harm but the fact is, it does. We know it does, they know, but it’s still being pushed, manufactured and sold to us. And yes, through ignorance, people choose some of it. Or necessity.

Take my little sister. Or any of my sisters for that matter. She’s a good citizen. College educated. And oh so sweet. She believes her doctors when they say vaccines are safe and effective. Necessary for the health and wellbeing of her children and society. Including the Covid one. So she diligently schedules their appointments and follows through with every single shot. She has a level of trust in their positions of authority. And therefore follows their lead. She is like most in America. Trusting the system to not lead her astray. That it’s there to guide and protect her.

What about the dentist and fluoride? Do most people know that fluoride calcifies the pineal gland? Does anyone care? When my kids were young, the dentist tried to prescribe little fluoride pills for them? I was like hell no - no way. What about people using fluoride toothpaste multiple times a day? What about its cumulative effects? The fact its added to city water systems amongst many other things.

This type of shit is everywhere. In systems used by billions on the daily.

Where does the chemical warfare ever end? It’s an attack on our senses. Literally.

We live in a society full of people who honestly believe that government, corporations and systems have their best interests at heart. It’s obvious to me that they do not.

I would argue they have their own interests at the center, profits - control. How do we scale this? How can we make food last longer so we don’t lose money? How do we make more _________? It’s insatiable appetites all around.

I’m reminded of The Lorax:

“… I, the Once-ler, felt sad as I watched them all go. BUT... business is business! And business must grow regardless of crummies in tummies, you know.

I meant no harm. I most truly did not. But I had to grow bigger. So bigger I got. I biggered my factory. I biggered my roads. I biggered my wagons. I biggered the loads of the Thneed's I shipped out. I was shipping them forth to the South! To the East! To the West! To the North! I went right on biggering...selling more Thneed's. And I biggered my money, which everyone needs…”

Do they not care that their products, whatever they are, make people sick? Leading to the degradation of people’s bodies and the Earth? Their minds? Society?

I would wager they’re more educated about the harms than the general public.

What’s the Layer 3 here?

Nobody on either side seems to care enough to work to change the Sickness System. To what end …. To what end I say!

“Better living through Chemistry” was a very successful operation it seems.. I wonder if way back then they could even begin to imagine what this would lead to. If I were them, I’d be rolling over in my grave.

Why do countries such as Japan and the UK limit these toxins and the US doesn’t? They understand the harm they cause and don’t allow it. The companies have proven that they can make them without so many additives and crap in them by selling these products abroad. What’s the reasoning for making the food even more toxically processed for the US market?

A conspiracy: the action of plotting or conspiring:

Are the big AgroBusinesses not conspiring with the FDA to continue adding more and more harmful substances to all manner of things, that have been proven to not be needed, while not informing the public? It sure seems so.

I’m not buying it. Literally and figuratively.

Sometimes I think it’s easier for the people living in lala land who have no clue and have never bothered to look. And just don’t care!

<<< The few I have asked would mostly set up foundations and give it to charity, however. >>>

Have you set up foundations? If so, in the vein of what?

If you didn't execute on a 2 trillion dollar idea, is it because the amount of money you've already acquired is enough for a lifetime? You could always donate to the Ecsys charity if you have excess.



There is more than a handful of your readers that 'pretend' to struggle with this aspect. Why would I continue to author that pending reality?



Reflecting your own words to gauge your response in a non sufficient effort.

Do you post on other platforms? Would you estimate that you have more than 300 current readers? Active readers appear to be fewer than 100, but that could change. It's still very impressive effort and production you do, but let's realistically assess your current reach. A week's worth of your YouTube videos reaches the 100-view mark. 10% of your audience posts regularly?



What troubles me today is your assertion of being the inventor of blockchain, a claim that seems to be made 15 years too late. Could you share the story of how you established the foundation for the government and subsequently got moved out of the department? To me, this situation connects back to the intriguing prediction of physical versus paper gold, which occurred before the mention of digital gold.

Why didn't you make the entertaining prediction in 2011 that Blockchain would reach $20,000?

Why hasn't the original account logged in since 2015? ... pending?

The change I am referring to is mostly related to $1000-1200 paper gold realizing the physical value of $20,000.

I fully understand that the prediction is still in play, but why wasn't blockchain discussed in the early era of 2011-2016?



How would it dramatically change my life? In what way? The primary preferred change would involve owning a house without mortgage payments, affording the opportunity to raise a family with more time and fewer financial ties to others.

Do gradual changes suffice, or is dramatic change the path of least resistance to seeking the forementioned change?

So, they go to extreme measures to conceal their private parts that wouldn't be visible in leggings? Maybe they practice inverting their genitals into their tummies?

Are sex tapes all CGI with prosthetics? Do they use some sort of detail cupping.

Last Edited by SpawnX on 03/08/2024 09:42 PM

I’ve thought about what you said some more and can see the conundrum. How do you house and feed and provide for billions of people?

But this all had to have a starting point.

Encouraging people to move to cities to work. To have others provide their daily sustenance while they do something else. Then the drive to put women in the workforce so they’re not home either, tending the babies. Growing the garden. Our attention turned ever outwards with every advancement of technology. The newspaper, the radio, the telephone, the car, and on and on.

We built this world together. But now the systems are so big. And seemingly unsustainable for the long term. Or in the least they encourage dis-ease of every part of the human and our society.

Who’s accountable? We all are. Who drives it? We both do.

It’s a lot to ponder and even more to begin to change it.

It’s like swimming upstream forever. Eventually, it won’t be possible anymore. Exhaustion sets in. Of people. Of resources. Someday, there’ll be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

<<Did you read my little red book!?!>>

What little red book? The punctuation alone makes me curious :)