Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,379 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 386,071
Pageviews Today: 501,718Threads Today: 161Posts Today: 1,811
04:23 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

"Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............

 
RichardHead
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
"Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
.OK, everyone and their brother is looking at this gal as the CLOWN she surely is. However my intuition tells me with all of the technology that has been sidelined that could/would abolish fossil fuels. Wouldnt it be ironic if this idiot was the one HISTORIANS looked back on as the one that was responsible for opening the dialogue and possibility?

OMG>..stop it DICK... no way....but...Stranger things have happened. Just sayin.

[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal Abolishes the Internal Combustion Engine


and i just realized, this post might be inchoate proof..hahaha

Last Edited by RichardHead on 02/08/2019 11:44 AM
Roman Stone
Jake

User ID: 76890717
United States
02/08/2019 11:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
all the car companies are moving into battery tech..

what they are attempting to do is to legislate that to happen

much faster.


tax tax tax

Last Edited by Slowly awakening on 02/08/2019 11:46 AM
Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance!

Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes."
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
all the car companies are moving into battery tech..

what they are attempting to do is to legislate that to happen

much faster.


tax tax tax
 Quoting: Jake


So you AGREE JAKE? And i submit and have heard its more than battery tech. Water, Nat..etc..
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72530568
Canada
02/08/2019 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
Take the carrots out of your ass Dick.
And as much as you pretend, we can see through you - you are a libtarded asshole communist posing as one who is not.
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
i think the sticking point is how many people are employed due to fossil fuels. yikes..
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77201407
United States
02/08/2019 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse.

Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels.

Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely.

I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets.

Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al.
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse.

Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels.

Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely.

I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets.

Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407


You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it.

[link to www.americanantigravity.com]
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77201407
United States
02/08/2019 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
If there truly was a viable energy alternative the cat would be out of the bag despite what pressure the fossil fuel industries would exert to suppress it.
There are too many "greens" to keep that technology a secret.

Show me this tech and I'll buy it (if it's less than twice the cost of fossil fuel and it doesn't use "hidden" fossil fuel mechanisms to achieve it's goals like electric cars do).
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
If there truly was a viable energy alternative the cat would be out of the bag despite what pressure the fossil fuel industries would exert to suppress it.
There are too many "greens" to keep that technology a secret.

Show me this tech and I'll buy it (if it's less than twice the cost of fossil fuel and it doesn't use "hidden" fossil fuel mechanisms to achieve it's goals like electric cars do).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407


A CONSPIRACY ??

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77347363
Canada
02/08/2019 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
.OK, everyone and their brother is looking at this gal as the CLOWN she surely is. However my intuition tells me with all of the technology that has been sidelined that could/would abolish fossil fuels. Wouldnt it be ironic if this idiot was the one HISTORIANS looked back on as the one that was responsible for opening the dialogue and possibility?

OMG>..stop it DICK... no way....but...Stranger things have happened. Just sayin.

[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal Abolishes the Internal Combustion Engine


and i just realized, this post might be inchoate proof..hahaha
 Quoting: RichardHead


Little do people know she's part of a larger Soros funded network of progressives attempting to win congressional seats all over the US.

There was big money behind her 'grass roots' campaign when they saw how many people fell for Bernie's idiocy.

Expect more of this quackery in the future.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77347363
Canada
02/08/2019 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse.

Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels.

Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely.

I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets.

Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407


You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it.

[link to www.americanantigravity.com]
 Quoting: RichardHead


Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands.

10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77347363
Canada
02/08/2019 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I can also add the US dollar has been propped up by petro for many decades.
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse.

Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels.

Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely.

I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets.

Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407


You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it.

[link to www.americanantigravity.com]
 Quoting: RichardHead


Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands.

10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77347363


So NO loss of jobs... riiiiiiiiiiiight.. you lost me with that logic. Sorry..
Roman Stone
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I can also add the US dollar has been propped up by petro for many decades.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77347363


understatement of the century...
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77337110
United States
02/08/2019 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
They have the technology to give us all water car's...plenty of sea water to power the world. The problem is elites who control your lives don't want this for the masses. See america2050.org for more info on your future.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68025210
Canada
02/08/2019 12:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
you lost me at abolish OP
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
you lost me at abolish OP
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68025210


Then you didnt read who said it. Mr. Numb nutz
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68025210
Canada
02/08/2019 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
just kidding

combustion engines should be for sport/enthusiasts only

we shouldn't abolish it, but lets bring out the new tech
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68025210
Canada
02/08/2019 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
;]
Icey

User ID: 77119763
United States
02/08/2019 01:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
Internal combustion engines will never be abolished. Too many people collect classic muscle cars. Many members of congress included. Not going to happen.
I am SNOWIE. WELCOME TO THE NEW ICE AGE. TRY NOT TO STARVE.
anonymous coward
User ID: 76076258
United States
02/08/2019 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
But what about the JETS, THE JETS MY GOD!
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
But what about the JETS, THE JETS MY GOD!
 Quoting: anonymous coward 76076258


H2O.? nuclear, ZPE ? i mean.. yeah.. Nano tech is off the charts scary stuff...but truth be told, i dont have a clue and im only responding egotistically to bump myself.

Last Edited by RichardHead on 02/08/2019 01:12 PM
Roman Stone
Manosteel

User ID: 73658259
United States
02/08/2019 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
Unless they have some hidden technology they plan to unveil, battery technology sucks donkey balls.

you get 200 miles then have to recharge them. I read somewhere the recharge time is 3 to 6 hours.

If you are traveling 1,000 miles and assuming 60 miles per hour average, you would have to stop every 3-4 hours to recharge...that takes another 4 hours...then you go another two hundred miles and repeat.

it will take you over 40 hours to go 1000 miles

no thanks on the electric car nonsense until it is much better than it is now
Only idiots hate facts
RichardHead  (OP)

User ID: 67281939
United States
02/08/2019 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
Unless they have some hidden technology they plan to unveil, battery technology sucks donkey balls.

you get 200 miles then have to recharge them. I read somewhere the recharge time is 3 to 6 hours.

If you are traveling 1,000 miles and assuming 60 miles per hour average, you would have to stop every 3-4 hours to recharge...that takes another 4 hours...then you go another two hundred miles and repeat.

it will take you over 40 hours to go 1000 miles

no thanks on the electric car nonsense until it is much better than it is now
 Quoting: Manosteel


And therein lies the quandary. Many smart folk think they do and are. Whoever they are, who knows?.

Dick (speaking in third person) knew a CIA guy, swears he brought two ruskies to U.S. that had developed a ceramic that had ZERO resistance to electrical impulse. All locations, people, checked and verified. HE said, its the loss of jobs that makes it a no go.....
Roman Stone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77347363
Canada
02/13/2019 11:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse.

Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels.

Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely.

I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets.

Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407


You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it.

[link to www.americanantigravity.com]
 Quoting: RichardHead


Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands.

10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77347363


So NO loss of jobs... riiiiiiiiiiiight.. you lost me with that logic. Sorry..
 Quoting: RichardHead


Don't stress it bro. You should change your username to RichardCranium. Less obvious and more catchy. cool2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75921703
United States
02/13/2019 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............
Nothing wrong with internal combustion engines. Just using the wrong fuel!

HYDROGEN is the way to go.

ZERO EMISSIONS...

WHY DON'T WE HEAR ABOUT HYDROGEN ANYMORE!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2226485
United States
02/13/2019 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but..............





GLP