"Abolish the internal combustion engine?" Sounds silly but.............. | |
Jake
User ID: 76890717 United States 02/08/2019 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the car companies are moving into battery tech.. what they are attempting to do is to legislate that to happen much faster. tax tax tax Last Edited by Slowly awakening on 02/08/2019 11:46 AM Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance! Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes." |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72530568 Canada 02/08/2019 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77201407 United States 02/08/2019 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels. Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely. I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets. Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al. |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407 Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels. Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely. I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets. Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al. You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it. [link to www.americanantigravity.com] Roman Stone |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77201407 United States 02/08/2019 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If there truly was a viable energy alternative the cat would be out of the bag despite what pressure the fossil fuel industries would exert to suppress it. There are too many "greens" to keep that technology a secret. Show me this tech and I'll buy it (if it's less than twice the cost of fossil fuel and it doesn't use "hidden" fossil fuel mechanisms to achieve it's goals like electric cars do). |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If there truly was a viable energy alternative the cat would be out of the bag despite what pressure the fossil fuel industries would exert to suppress it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407 There are too many "greens" to keep that technology a secret. Show me this tech and I'll buy it (if it's less than twice the cost of fossil fuel and it doesn't use "hidden" fossil fuel mechanisms to achieve it's goals like electric cars do). A CONSPIRACY ?? [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Roman Stone |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77347363 Canada 02/08/2019 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .OK, everyone and their brother is looking at this gal as the CLOWN she surely is. However my intuition tells me with all of the technology that has been sidelined that could/would abolish fossil fuels. Wouldnt it be ironic if this idiot was the one HISTORIANS looked back on as the one that was responsible for opening the dialogue and possibility? Quoting: RichardHead OMG>..stop it DICK... no way....but...Stranger things have happened. Just sayin. [link to www.breitbart.com (secure)] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal Abolishes the Internal Combustion Engine and i just realized, this post might be inchoate proof..hahaha Little do people know she's part of a larger Soros funded network of progressives attempting to win congressional seats all over the US. There was big money behind her 'grass roots' campaign when they saw how many people fell for Bernie's idiocy. Expect more of this quackery in the future. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77347363 Canada 02/08/2019 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407 Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels. Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely. I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets. Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al. You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it. [link to www.americanantigravity.com] Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands. 10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77347363 Canada 02/08/2019 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407 Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels. Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely. I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets. Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al. You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it. [link to www.americanantigravity.com] Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands. 10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.) So NO loss of jobs... riiiiiiiiiiiight.. you lost me with that logic. Sorry.. Roman Stone |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77337110 United States 02/08/2019 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68025210 Canada 02/08/2019 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68025210 Canada 02/08/2019 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68025210 Canada 02/08/2019 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Icey
User ID: 77119763 United States 02/08/2019 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anonymous coward User ID: 76076258 United States 02/08/2019 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | H2O.? nuclear, ZPE ? i mean.. yeah.. Nano tech is off the charts scary stuff...but truth be told, i dont have a clue and im only responding egotistically to bump myself. Last Edited by RichardHead on 02/08/2019 01:12 PM Roman Stone |
Manosteel
User ID: 73658259 United States 02/08/2019 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Unless they have some hidden technology they plan to unveil, battery technology sucks donkey balls. you get 200 miles then have to recharge them. I read somewhere the recharge time is 3 to 6 hours. If you are traveling 1,000 miles and assuming 60 miles per hour average, you would have to stop every 3-4 hours to recharge...that takes another 4 hours...then you go another two hundred miles and repeat. it will take you over 40 hours to go 1000 miles no thanks on the electric car nonsense until it is much better than it is now Only idiots hate facts |
RichardHead
(OP) User ID: 67281939 United States 02/08/2019 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Unless they have some hidden technology they plan to unveil, battery technology sucks donkey balls. Quoting: Manosteel you get 200 miles then have to recharge them. I read somewhere the recharge time is 3 to 6 hours. If you are traveling 1,000 miles and assuming 60 miles per hour average, you would have to stop every 3-4 hours to recharge...that takes another 4 hours...then you go another two hundred miles and repeat. it will take you over 40 hours to go 1000 miles no thanks on the electric car nonsense until it is much better than it is now And therein lies the quandary. Many smart folk think they do and are. Whoever they are, who knows?. Dick (speaking in third person) knew a CIA guy, swears he brought two ruskies to U.S. that had developed a ceramic that had ZERO resistance to electrical impulse. All locations, people, checked and verified. HE said, its the loss of jobs that makes it a no go..... Roman Stone |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77347363 Canada 02/13/2019 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like horses too but there aren't enough hours in the day to commute by horse. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77201407 Pollution is released in the manufacture of batteries and electricity for the electric cars so you can't say that curbs the use of fossil fuels. Mankind does not have an effective means of travel that does not promote the use of fossil fuels. Wind and solar are nice but limited and no one knows how to use nuclear safely. I can't imagine a modern society that does not have air travel yet fossil fuel is spent at one liter per second in the newest large body jets. Who's willing to party like it's 1699 to quote Weird Al. You know AC, not to refute the potential truth of which you speak. I have read and heard of too many technologies that are available but again. The loss of jobs, forbids it. [link to www.americanantigravity.com] Not loss of jobs, loss of control. You spend 1/3 of your time working just to pay for energy costs that went into the products you consume to the heat in your home. Black op tech will free too many people and they will lose control when it ends up in the wrong hands. 10 years ago I read there were over 5000 patents (in one year) relating to energy efficiency classified b/c they were deemed a threat to national security. (eg, the deep state banned them.) So NO loss of jobs... riiiiiiiiiiiight.. you lost me with that logic. Sorry.. Don't stress it bro. You should change your username to RichardCranium. Less obvious and more catchy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75921703 United States 02/13/2019 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2226485 United States 02/13/2019 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |