SPACEX launched 4 CIVILIANS into SPACE yesterday... BUT since then NO footage of them in SPACE?

Lol...who cares what a silly little rocket with rich people in it does. Its 2021, and we are supposed to care about a rocket using fundamentally the same technology of the 1960s that can't even get to the moon?

You go up, but you never come back!

.


pic of crew at 6:35 is as fake as it gets. All 4 faces are photoshoped in please people...




.

humans have created the best photography and video equipment in the world and we get shitty pics with bad angles from NASA.

how about a few 360 cameras mounted on the rocket...
fucking joke!


and Astro still shills this shit.

Astro your shilly wrong and a fucking idiot. no one believes your fake shit anymore

They rang the closing bell on the stock exchange today.

Ask Mr. Ocean where the rockets go, and, Mr. Island resort where the passengers go. space aint it

It's not fake. You're an idiot.

Bahaha. No. That's not how it works. If it's so easy to write better software than mine, go do it. Otherwise shut the hell up.

Nope. 940 mph. And yes, they were tested beforehand. The "facts" stated by the AC were a complete lie.

Nope. I am winning. Big time.

I don't care what you believe, the Falcon 9 is inherently far less shaky than the space shuttle was. It uses liquid fueled engines entirely, thus the burn is much smoother. If you don't believe me about the G forces, go ride mission space. The G forces do not prevent you from moving your arms. 3-4 G's is not that bad and they had months of training in centrifuges and high performance aircraft pulling even more G's than a nominal ascent.

Exactly. ACs on GLP don't get to define that.

Spaceprogram is fake as Fauci

I watched it go up from my office window. The window lines up perfectly with the Cape so I caught the orange glow as soon as it was above the horizon. Very beautiful.

Why are they wearing the tall boots? Are they expecting the toilet to overflow? :)

The boots are part of the pressure suit design. I think it was just to give it more of the biker aesthetic. They do need to provide good traction for emergency situations. Fire suppression systems soaked one of the early shuttle crews and they didn't even realize they almost walked into an invisible hydrogen flame. That particular hazard isn't relevant to Falcon, but in an emergency egress scenario (prior to closing the hatch and arming the abort system) they may need to climb back out of the capsule, run across the access arm, get to the escape baskets and ride the slide wire away from the pad, followed by a scramble in the dirt to a nearby waiting armored personnel carrier to drive further away from the pad.

Last Edited by Astromut on 09/18/2021 09:52 AM

You cant argue with a liar/deceiver. Common sense should tell you that, you can never win that argument.

Hey Astro.
I know the flat earth argument is endless..

But what do you think of a similar model to both.

The circular flat earth model map with those stars sun and moon moving similar to that model but farther than they claim.

But the circular flat earth map placed onto a bigger spherical planet with nothing but inhabitable cold Ice beyond.

The moon always faces the same direction. Whats to say our earth doesnt do somthing similar and spins while facing the sun making a melted zone on a bigger planet.

Know it sounds funny but just wanted to know you thoughts on if somthing this could at all be possible. Or if theres any variables that I didnt think of that you could mix into my odd thoughts that would make such a thing possible LOL

Ive had arguments with you back in 2010 ish. Squashed that And I do respect the fact that you know more about the sky then me.

The moon is tidally locked, same as most moons in the solar system. If earth were flat, different parts of earth should be seeing a different side of the moon at the same time. Flat Earth doesn't work. The problem for any such model isn't that the distances aren't large enough, it's that for three or more observation points you get contradictory distances based on the azimuth and elevation of celestial objects. It comports with the round Earth but cannot be explained by the flat Earth.

I agree but could the sphere earth be bigger than we think with a circular melted spot that looks like the flat earth map. with the rest being frozen over.
With this being the melted circular spot faces the sun dominantly in god knows what spinning pattern.

Is somthing like this may possible?
Feel free to put your own spin on my thought its difficult to explain

And Thanks

No. Anyone can measure the size of the earth using Eratosthenes method. Applied over three or more locations, the flat Earth cannot explain the results and the results can be used to calculate the circumference of the earth. Amateurs have done this, it comports with the mainstream figures.

It helps to keep your eyes open while looking at your screen...

lol

They almost look like siblings.