The Witch's Corner

I'm about to go feast on sustenance as that's a requirement of me doing things and stuff, but before I do...

I think there's a lot of systems that speak vaguely about the interconnectedness or have an explanation that is sufficient for them to proceed.

I'm sort of at something like a liquid crystal many phase universal consciousness of frequencies vibrating and modulating it's own sound and light to form in to different structures resulting in a kind of 'holographic' fractal that is constantly expanding and rolling back in on itself, recursively building on itself according to a collective consensus of what is, fuelled by (near)infinite potential(ity) energy of the 'void', [as dark matter currently]. Realities as we know them are the actualization of that potentiality, through our individual and collective intent for that potential to 'be'.

Ow my brain, hope that makes sense.

I mean, part of what we discuss a scientist might point at and say "that's blah theory!", but I'm not so familiar with all the science to be the guy that does so.

Now food.

It's like we're all part of this cosmic symphony, with each of us playing our own unique instrument, and the resulting melody is the reality we experience. Maybe string theory fits in here somewhere. -vibrating strings - multiverses? -Brian Greene!

[link to www.britannica.com (secure)]

[link to www.britannica.com (secure)]

"The Man In The High Castle" series explores multiverses rather well, I thought...

Do you have any of your own thoughts and theories on the topics GW or myself has been posting?

Do you have any of your own thoughts and theories on the topics GW or myself has been posting?

I have been trying to wrap my head around Einsteins "theory of everything!" like E=mc², but no luck so far.

Do you have any of your own thoughts and theories on the topics GW or myself has been posting?

You are suggesting that the universe is built up from repeating patterns and structures that are connected on multiple scales, from the smallest subatomic particles to the largest galaxies?

Do you have any of your own thoughts and theories on the topics GW or myself has been posting?

I have been trying to wrap my head around Einsteins "theory of everything!" like E=mc², but no luck so far.

Yes... everything, is connected. Every atom and molecule is
connected in one way or another.

I was going to set out some rudimentary equations but GLP cannot print the characters, no matter.

If you figure out the grand unification theory you'll practically reinvent the wheel and rediscover fire.

The idea that the universe is built on repeating patterns and structures, and that everything is connected on multiple scales, is a central concept in many spiritual and philosophical traditions.

From a scientific perspective, we can see this idea reflected in the concept of fractals, which are patterns that repeat themselves at different scales.

Fractals can be found throughout nature, from the branching patterns of trees and blood vessels to the structure of galaxies and the distribution of matter in the universe.

Consciousness plays a role in shaping reality at a quantum level.

Entanglement. Einstein himself called it "spooky action at a distance".

I was going to set out some rudimentary equations but GLP cannot print the characters, no matter.

So you can entangle?

All this math just to tell us, you know thy fruit?

I like it..

Show and Prove


"The universe is fractal in its structures, and holographic in its expressions and reflections.."

Getting ready for work. I'll be posting stuff in the morning lol

Don't work too hard..

Fractals exhibit self-similarity at different scales, while holograms contain the whole image within each part. Can these concepts be applied to understand the interconnectedness and hidden depths within the universe?

I think you'll get better responses, interaction and understanding if you discuss what's happening in the math rather than just drop equations on people.

Include a
[link for math proof for those that can read it]

or something.

I've been doing some work refining my own ponderings using AI to go back and forth on some topics.

One method is in a fictional universe, throwing some ideas in to a simulation and seeing what and how they get dealt with by the model.
(I sent you a link for that)

Another is having a different model rewrite my own theories and discuss bits and pieces in detail, relating or discarding bits n pieces.

Is it rediscovering fire? Probably not, but my own efforts have been centered around tying magic and the ways of the past with modern theories, such as quantum entanglement in the creation of voodoo dolls and other such things.

In that way - there's been some progress in recent years, imo anyway :D

I may simply be m-mmmmad.

:)

According to the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics, first proposed by Carlo Rovelli,[92] observations such as those in the double-slit experiment result specifically from the interaction between the observer (measuring device) and the object being observed (physically interacted with), not any absolute property possessed by the object.