BLM-Antifa Target Restaurant in Louisville, Several Protestors Armed – Patron Pulls a Pistol!

I agree with your sentiment, but this situation happened just because some people went out to eat.

So, what do you suggest? Hole up in a cave somewhere till all this gets settled?

that little .22 pistol sells for $500 dollars, you gotta be kidding me.

right there is your business opportunity, learn how to drill a bore, buy a drill press at Menard's for $130


the tools of production are now more affordable than ever and the products are becoming unaffordable, people are becoming dumber

Just a guess but it might've been the establishment owner, general mgr or hostess.

Have to go back and look better at the video since I missed her waving a lil' packin' pinkie <reaching over for better reading glasses>

And yeah, the old dude waving that lil' pepperbox around, he looked like Colonel Sanders cousin. That might've fucked the crowd up a bit psyche wise. Just sayin'....

you realize you can take a steel rod and drill a hole in it

and now it's a barrel.

you drill another hole that barrel fits into, and now you have a breach, you drill a tiny hole for a pin to strike the center fire, and now you have a gun.


all the people spending money on tattoes to look tough could have bought gear to gunsmith with that money and built 100's of guns with the raw materials that coast same as their tattoos, sold them at 1000% profit

Bingo..it is all about stalling whites fighting back to allow for our defeat....the interlopers also created Trump,Q and numerous other things to keep us from defeating our enemies...wake up folks they are at war with us and have been since Cain murdered Abel

The president can not do anything in a state unless it is on Federal property. This is where people get a little mixed up on there to lay the blame. Even the trouble can be started by a group outside the state, yet the gov and locals are the one calling the shots on how to treat these people, that terrorist is Antifa and BLM, they have been allowed to exist because of States not addressing the problem. The state can write some laws to stop this, if they know they are going to be arrested and the getting out is high, people won't be sending that bailout money. Then the amount of time in the jail or prison can be, so it is not smart to stay in those states.

It is not Federal it is the states jurisdictions, the governors can ask the Federal gov to help, it wasn't done, every time they were allowed the rioting and burning stopped. Believe it or not, some of the people doing this are not Americans.

earring boy is pushing the limits ,the old guy had every right to pull it out.you come to me in a threatening manner while I'm sitting at dinner with your ar ready to rock and it's on i will protect my family.soon more blood will be spilled ,will it be enough to spark a war I don't know we been pretty dam tolerant thus far.

The DOJ can lay federal charges, such as civil rights charges.

Now that Chauvin was convicted of murder, the federal civil-rights suit that they're starting is probably a slam dunk.

And if he hadn't been convicted, they were going to have the state arrest him on some pretext and hold him until the feds arrived at the courthouse to arrest him on some federal charge.

Likewise the Obama administration got the local Florida jurisdiction to appoint a special prosecutor who charged George Zimmerman with 2nd degree murder without a grand jury, after nobody could get a grand jury to charge him with anything.

Those two patrons will be thrown in prison under Biden just like all of the business owners who tried defending their livelihoods or escaping a mob under Trump were.

Antifa will walk free without a scratch. Different fake presidents... same gameplan.

Can't understand a fucking word those apes are yelling. Especially that gorilla in the white shirt.
BLM members sound so fucking dumb. dumb blacks

It's almost like God knew what He was doing when, in the beginning, He separated the races and gave each their respective continent.

I think it's time the world gets back to that.

the violence is politically sanctioned by the rulers of the areas afflicted with it. it will not stop until it is in the best interest of the those regimes to have it stop.

It's really crazy today.

In the last year I've found that I carry my 9mm with me everywhere I go.

I never used to do that. Maybe on the road, but never to just the store like I do now.

I pack everywhere I go now.

Eh, I would have just continued eating.

Don't f*** with old people. They are fed up to the eyeballs with other people's crap. They know they are leaving soon, so they basically have nothing to lose.

No.

Self-Defense

Kentucky is a Castle Doctrine state and has a “stand your ground” law. A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another, or to prevent the commission of a felony involving the use of force.

Use of Physical Force in Defense of Self or a Third Party
The use of physical force by a person is justifiable when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect the person or a third party against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force. The use of deadly force by a person is justifiable only when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect himself or a third party against imminent death, serious physical injury, kidnapping, sexual intercourse compelled by force or threat, or other felony involving the use of force.

Justification and Criminal and Civil Immunity
A person who uses permitted force is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom the force was used is a peace officer.

So, what would you do if you were eating peacefully and a BLM/Antifa clown walked up to your table knocked your food onto the floor and got in your face?

No.

Self-Defense

Kentucky is a Castle Doctrine state and has a “stand your ground” law. A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another, or to prevent the commission of a felony involving the use of force.

Use of Physical Force in Defense of Self or a Third Party
The use of physical force by a person is justifiable when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect the person or a third party against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force. The use of deadly force by a person is justifiable only when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect himself or a third party against imminent death, serious physical injury, kidnapping, sexual intercourse compelled by force or threat, or other felony involving the use of force.

Justification and Criminal and Civil Immunity
A person who uses permitted force is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom the force was used is a peace officer.

Self-Defense

Kentucky is a Castle Doctrine state and has a “stand your ground” law. A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another, or to prevent the commission of a felony involving the use of force.

Use of Physical Force in Defense of Self or a Third Party
The use of physical force by a person is justifiable when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect the person or a third party against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force. The use of deadly force by a person is justifiable only when the person believes that such force is necessary to protect himself or a third party against imminent death, serious physical injury, kidnapping, sexual intercourse compelled by force or threat, or other felony involving the use of force.

Justification and Criminal and Civil Immunity
A person who uses permitted force is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom the force was used is a peace officer.

Put the on train cars and gas them all.

Terrorist group!

These groups are a cancer.

What is their endgame?

What will it take for them to disappear permanently?

Since the cops refuse to do anything meaningful against their Black Lives Matter domestic terrorist Masters, Alpacalips, yes, very much so. The cops will murder anyone who dares to harm their BLM domestic terrorist Masters.