|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Let's talk about God
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Victor Vectors |
|
Post Content
|
...
Yeah, the subject of Psalm 18 and 2 Samuel 22. I *get* it. Kind to the kind, cruel to the cruel, shrewd to the clever, etc. The viewpoint of the shudra class is not included in the Vedas; the viewpoint of the Canaanites is not included in the Bible, etc. The complaints against the group are deferred to God, and then the fact of it being a complaint is called blasphemy. Inverting cause and effect strike me as an incredibly useful strategy for group control, especially where a hierarchy is involved.
But are those members at the top of the hierarchy accountable? Because religion would have us believe they are accountable to God, and that is where the genuine blame comes in. Shouldn't God respond faster than the courts do, and with absolutely no injustice whatever?
Quoting: IfYouInsist When or where or who established the God we are talking about in this thread? Did You? I did not. Many consider themselves undeveloped Gods. All known gods have a domain. They control something. Usually someone. Energy and thus status being conserved, who is made a slave or subhuman so that someone else can be a god? Who in their right mind wants to be a God or god? Why? Maybe the left brain is responsible?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
