REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
Perhaps where we are heading is some form of “Freedom-Socialist” state
|
Poster Handle
|
TurtleManEa |
Post Content
|
A “Freedom-Socialist” party would be the very center of politics. It would be “objectively” the answer to what we are looking for. An umbrella that all people could find what they are looking for. There is nothing wrong with having far-left or far-right parties, but we must have a new “center” that incorporates the “best” of all parties.
Quoting: TurtleManEa The world is falling apart because most ideas have gotten threadbare, coupled with the fact that everyone rightly suspects they are rigged. Reconfiguring the system to bribe everyone isn't the solution and adding theology to the mix makes the whole scam stink to high heaven. Civilizations, peoples, and even entire species have an expiration date. Learn to accept it. Quoting: IfYouInsist Metaphysics IS NOT theology. It is the underlying rules and principles of the “game of life.” Any system works if it is built upon metaphysics. To me the best of all worlds is probably some form of socialism-freedom-metaphysics that eventually leads to a fully “Metaphysical-Anarchist” state. This is what my intention is to provide. A stepping stone to a “Metaphysical-Anarchist” state which is more or less what the primordial-traditional state was. Quoting: TurtleManEa All I've seen are violations of civil liberties from people hardened by indoctrination against them. It's becoming clear that the easy way out is also the desirable way out. Please stop with your fascist sweet-talking. Quoting: IfYouInsist Fascism is the very opposite of freedom in many ways. I am advocating a system that all people could take part in, regardless of their ideology. We are already there, but it has not been put in a conceptual framework from which to achieve. Some groups, especially those who wish the downfall of the US, attempt to divide us and to start a civil war by saying that one can either be “freedom-loving” or socialist, but not both. Well what if we can be both? I advocate for this path.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|