Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,330 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 226,650
Pageviews Today: 290,469Threads Today: 59Posts Today: 962
02:26 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75708546
United States
09/22/2020 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks
A ruling Monday by a federal judge in Wisconsin that would extend the counting of mail-in ballots six days beyond Election Day would also allow those ballots to be counted even if there is no “definitive” sign of a postmark.

U.S. District Judge William Conley of the Western District of Wisconsin — an appointee of President Barack Obama — ruled that absentee ballots in the state can be counted until Nov. 9 as long as they are postmarked by Election Day, Nov. 3. He cited the state’s difficult experience in the recent primary election, as well as projected difficulties with the U.S. Post Office as it handles an unprecedented number of mailed-in ballots.

In a footnote, Conley added:

Given the political deadlock among WEC Commissioners and the apparent lack of state law guidance on this subject — as well as the fact that this postmark requirement is federally mandated and the apparent importance of equal treatment of ballots after Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000) — it is this court’s view that local election officials should generally err toward counting otherwise legitimate absentee ballots lacking a definitive postmark if received by mail after election day but no later than November 9, 2020, as long as the ballot is signed and witnessed on or before November 3, 2020, unless there is some reason to believe that the ballot was actually placed in the mail after election day.

more:

[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 75708546
United States
09/22/2020 03:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks
Can't somebody sue these psychos?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79304713
United States
09/22/2020 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks
And so it begins, the ballot stuffing fukery
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 75708546
United States
09/22/2020 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks
And so it begins, the ballot stuffing fukery
 Quoting: Babaji


They'll come up with more votes than the WI population and claim the republicans cheated.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77531639
Canada
09/22/2020 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: And its Evers with the Cheat! Wisconsin Ruling Allows Mail-in Ballots to Be Counted Without ‘Definitive’ Postmarks
A ruling Monday by a federal judge in Wisconsin that would extend the counting of mail-in ballots six days beyond Election Day would also allow those ballots to be counted even if there is no “definitive” sign of a postmark.

U.S. District Judge William Conley of the Western District of Wisconsin — an appointee of President Barack Obama — ruled that absentee ballots in the state can be counted until Nov. 9 as long as they are postmarked by Election Day, Nov. 3. He cited the state’s difficult experience in the recent primary election, as well as projected difficulties with the U.S. Post Office as it handles an unprecedented number of mailed-in ballots.

In a footnote, Conley added:

Given the political deadlock among WEC Commissioners and the apparent lack of state law guidance on this subject — as well as the fact that this postmark requirement is federally mandated and the apparent importance of equal treatment of ballots after Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000) — it is this court’s view that local election officials should generally err toward counting otherwise legitimate absentee ballots lacking a definitive postmark if received by mail after election day but no later than November 9, 2020, as long as the ballot is signed and witnessed on or before November 3, 2020, unless there is some reason to believe that the ballot was actually placed in the mail after election day.

more:

[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Annie Oakley


who is going to confirm the signature and the witnessing of the ballot being cast?





GLP