Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! | |
Esoterica
User ID: 27327715 United States 07/05/2015 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
brassbat
User ID: 15444309 United States 07/05/2015 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lionels Love
User ID: 62072053 United States 07/05/2015 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46513583 United States 07/05/2015 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! |
Esoterica
User ID: 27327715 United States 07/05/2015 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? "The more you know, the crazier you look" |
SAGD
User ID: 69608350 Canada 07/05/2015 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? Lyn Leaz really one of the biggest bullshitters on the web SAGD |
PirateMonkey
User ID: 68748244 United States 07/05/2015 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? How dare you question the word of Astrojesus! 7/11 was a part time job! Psalm 35:19 Let not them that are mine enemies wrongfully rejoice over me: neither let them wink with the eye that hate me without a cause. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1179838 United States 07/05/2015 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “The public didn’t name Planet X, the government did […] that’s the first rule of Planet X 101″, Rand pointed out passionately. Rand then made mention of a 1984 U.S. News and World Report article which revealed yet another clue to what NASA found. “They named it a brown dwarf star," said Rand. Brown dwarf From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Artist's concept of a T-type brown dwarf Comparision: most brown dwarfs are only slightly larger than Jupiter (10–15%) but up to 75 times heavier due to greater density. Note: The Sun is not in the correct scale. It is actually larger than represented. Brown dwarfs are substellar objects not massive enough to sustain hydrogen-1 fusion reactions in their cores, unlike main-sequence stars. They occupy the mass range between the heaviest gas giants and the lightest stars, with an upper limit around 75[1] to 80 Jupiter masses (MJ). Brown dwarfs heavier than about 13 MJ are thought to fuse deuterium and those above ~65 MJ, fuse lithium as well.[2] Brown dwarfs may be fully convective, with no layers or chemical differentiation by depth.[3] The defining differences between a very-low-mass brown dwarf and a giant planet (~13 MJ) are currently being debated.[4] One school of thought is based on formation; the other, on the physics of the interior.[4] Part of the debate concerns whether "brown dwarfs" must, by definition, have experienced fusion at some point in their history. Stars are categorized by spectral class, with brown dwarfs being designated as types M, L, T, and Y.[4][5] Despite their name, brown dwarfs are of different colours.[4] Many brown dwarfs would likely appear magenta to the human eye,[4][6] or possibly orange/red.[7] Brown dwarfs are not very luminous at visible wavelengths. Some planets are known to orbit brown dwarfs: 2M1207b, MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb, and 2MASS J044144b At a distance of about 6.5 light years, the nearest known brown dwarf is Luhman 16, a binary system of brown dwarfs discovered in 2013. One brown dwarf, DENIS-P J082303.1-491201 b, from an ultracool binary system, has a mass of about 28 MJ, making it the largest known exoplanet (as of March 2014). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
HollyWho
User ID: 42783921 United States 07/05/2015 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra
User ID: 69682884 Germany 07/05/2015 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? You can find the explanation here: [link to articles.adsabs.harvard.edu] . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 06:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? Please quote from the article where it says "NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion." That is not what the article says. "So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. " It says they didn't know what it was. In fact there were multiple unidentified point-like sources. I've been over this many times before IRAS did not discover any planets. It did find some initially unidentified point-like sources. The 1983 article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. In fact, it initially found 9 unidentified point-like sources of infrared light, listed here: Quoting: Astromut 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732+239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” Here are the papers that identified these objects: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69574646 United States 07/05/2015 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? How dare you question the word of Astrojesus! L M A O |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? How dare you question the word of Astrojesus! L M A O I'm not going to ban anyone for asking a question, but I do ask that you read the answer. “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? Please quote from the article where it says "NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion." That is not what the article says. "So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. " It says they didn't know what it was. In fact there were multiple unidentified point-like sources. I've been over this many times before IRAS did not discover any planets. It did find some initially unidentified point-like sources. The 1983 article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. In fact, it initially found 9 unidentified point-like sources of infrared light, listed here: Quoting: Astromut 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732+239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” Here are the papers that identified these objects: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. Oh, and by the way, the above coordinates from the original IRAS paper are given in the B1950 epoch which was still in use in the 80's. Be sure to precess forward before use. You guys all know how to do that, right? Last Edited by Astromut on 07/05/2015 06:55 PM |
Esoterica
User ID: 27327715 United States 07/05/2015 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? Please quote from the article where it says "NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion." That is not what the article says. "So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. " It says they didn't know what it was. In fact there were multiple unidentified point-like sources. I've been over this many times before IRAS did not discover any planets. It did find some initially unidentified point-like sources. The 1983 article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. In fact, it initially found 9 unidentified point-like sources of infrared light, listed here: Quoting: Astromut 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732+239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” Here are the papers that identified these objects: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. Ahh, thank you for answering! I have never seen that response from you before. "The more you know, the crazier you look" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69668999 United States 07/05/2015 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68684469 United States 07/05/2015 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Esoterica
User ID: 27327715 United States 07/05/2015 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. According to Wikipedia, they DID! Thus: News event The observatory made headlines briefly with the announcement on December 10, 1983 of the discovery of an "unknown object" at first described as "possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system."[7][8] Further analysis revealed that, of several unidentified objects, nine were distant galaxies and the tenth was "intergalactic cirrus".[9] None were found to be Solar System bodies.[9][10] Link: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] In fact, Even the Washington Post did a major story on it, archived HERE: [link to web.archive.org] No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. “In November of 1983 NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1179838 No, they didn't. Why this then? [link to planet-x.150m.com] Dr. Astro, I have always admired your expertise, but I have seen the article, with the photos. How do you explain that? Please quote from the article where it says "NASA’s IRAS infrared telescope discovered an unbelievably huge, massive, what looked like a slowly burning star, a big object, headed right toward our solar system from the region of Orion." That is not what the article says. "So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. " It says they didn't know what it was. In fact there were multiple unidentified point-like sources. I've been over this many times before IRAS did not discover any planets. It did find some initially unidentified point-like sources. The 1983 article claims it "could" be a jupiter-like planet OR extra-galactic, they had no idea when it was first observed. IRAS did not find a planet though, it did find a number of infrared-luminous galaxies and intragalactic dust. In fact, it initially found 9 unidentified point-like sources of infrared light, listed here: Quoting: Astromut 0358+223 3h 58m 2.8s 22d 18’ 0” 0404+101 4h 4m 44.7s 10d 11’ 52” 0412+085 4h 12m 32.3s 8d 31’ 13” 0413+122 4h 13m 47.3s 12d 17’ 16” 0422+009 4h 22m 54.0s 0d 56’ 6” 0425-012 4h 25m 12.1s -1d 14’ 50” 1703+049 17h 3m 1.4s 4d 57’ 50” 1712+100 17h 12m 57.8s 10d 4’ 8” 1732+239 17h 32m 51.4s 23d 56’ 36” Here are the papers that identified these objects: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey, Houck et al. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 278, March 1, 1984, p. L63-L66 Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L5-L8. Optical counterparts of unidentified IRAS point sources Infrared luminous galaxies, Aaronson and Olszewski, Nature, vol. 309, May 31, 1984, p. 414-417. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69684121 United States 07/05/2015 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! |
x User ID: 69533089 United States 07/05/2015 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Nasa lies about everything.. No moon landing..no mars rovers.. mo ceres lights..no pluto dark spots..if in fact the iss is real its in our atmosphere.. earth is not round.. dome covers us..and no planet x..Doom off tards!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68689644 United Arab Emirates 07/05/2015 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Astro wrote: No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. OK, so the article doesn't use the term "planet X"...Is that you're single basis for trying to discredit the entire thread? That's serious shill teritory! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69685735 Chile 07/05/2015 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Astro wrote: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68689644 No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. OK, so the article doesn't use the term "planet X"...Is that you're single basis for trying to discredit the entire thread? That's serious shill teritory! No, your reading comprehension is apparently non existent. The article doesn't say they discovered a planet or star headed for earth, period. It says they don't know what they found. There were multiple unidentified sources, 9, I listed them and the articles that ultimately identified them. And yes you can see them in the newer wise data too, they haven't gone anywhere since they're not planets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69685735 Chile 07/05/2015 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! What DID they discover then? . . . Did they discover ANYTHING AT ALL? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69685735 YES!!! they DID discover something. But what is it? . . . Something that must be kept in THE warehouse!!! It's all listed and cited in my post above if you'd bother to read it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69685735 Chile 07/05/2015 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Astro wrote: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68689644 No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. OK, so the article doesn't use the term "planet X"...Is that you're single basis for trying to discredit the entire thread? That's serious shill teritory! No, your reading comprehension is apparently non existent. The article doesn't say they discovered a planet or star headed for earth, period. It says they don't know what they found. There were multiple unidentified sources, 9, I listed them and the articles that ultimately identified them. And yes you can see them in the newer wise data too, they haven't gone anywhere since they're not planets. I am with you, it doesn´t say that, it says THEY DON´T KNOW ! ! ! So it could even be the Death Star . . . It can also be PLANET X |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69685735 Chile 07/05/2015 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Astro wrote: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68689644 No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. OK, so the article doesn't use the term "planet X"...Is that you're single basis for trying to discredit the entire thread? That's serious shill teritory! No, your reading comprehension is apparently non existent. The article doesn't say they discovered a planet or star headed for earth, period. It says they don't know what they found. There were multiple unidentified sources, 9, I listed them and the articles that ultimately identified them. And yes you can see them in the newer wise data too, they haven't gone anywhere since they're not planets. I am with you, it doesn´t say that, it says THEY DON´T KNOW ! ! ! So it could even be the Death Star . . . It can also be PLANET X ASTRO, with my respect to you, I am not trying to say planetx is coming, but if scientists ignore what it is, for me (and my ignorance) sounds like not knowing what is coming around the corner, but KNOWING something IS coming, it could be anything. Thanks. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 38777359 United States 07/05/2015 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Urgent! NASA Has Just Been Caught In A Huge Lie, and We Are In Serious Trouble! It Is Time To Pray Like Never Before! Astro wrote: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68689644 No, they didn't. For the love of god, read the thread, I already discussed that article. It does not say they discovered planet X. OK, so the article doesn't use the term "planet X"...Is that you're single basis for trying to discredit the entire thread? That's serious shill teritory! No, your reading comprehension is apparently non existent. The article doesn't say they discovered a planet or star headed for earth, period. It says they don't know what they found. There were multiple unidentified sources, 9, I listed them and the articles that ultimately identified them. And yes you can see them in the newer wise data too, they haven't gone anywhere since they're not planets. I am with you, it doesn´t say that, it says THEY DON´T KNOW ! ! ! So it could even be the Death Star . . . It can also be PLANET X ASTRO, with my respect to you, I am not trying to say planetx is coming, but if scientists ignore what it is, for me (and my ignorance) sounds like not knowing what is coming around the corner, but KNOWING something IS coming, it could be anything. Thanks. It doesn't say anything is coming, it doesn't say that what they found was headed this way or any way at all. It was just the initial discovery of unidentified point-like sources. They didn't know what it was initially and the Washington Post wrote an article to sound sexy, not likely. It turned out to be infrared bright very distant galaxies and intragalactic cirrus, basically hot clumps of dust. They know what it is now and have for a long, long time. I already explained and cited all that, please read my posts. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63579320 United States 07/05/2015 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |