The Guide to Unlocking Your Subconscious Mind and Understanding Reality (The Book of Secrets)

"Ulysses and the Book of Secrets", published May 14

Available as a free PDF at [link to mindcraft5.com] for the next few days

Last Edited by The Builder on 05/22/2015 10:02 PM

can't download from the link is the new available free for kindle?

Hi. Thanks for letting me know. What happens when you try to download?

The new book will be available for free (on Kindle) in about 2 weeks. (Meanwhile, it's a free PDF at the link)

OP, thank you again for all your hard work. This is where I am. My mind is expanding exponentially every day where I am seeing more and more connections and am able to synthesize at will. The question for me is motivation to work. I am only motivated to solve problems. Otherwise, I stay in jnana-yogi stasis. I can see this now after reading your book. I have found a likely trajectory for my personal goals with a greater good flowing from my most relative positions. I understand of course that each solution comes with its own set of problems. We are talking to ourself (deliberate bad grammar), after all.

I also think that in order to produce desired maximum effect in the material plane (which I persist in wanting to do) I need to disengage from the idea that we are all one in some ways and embrace it in some others. I know there's more underneath, but it's better for now to play within the rules of the game and nudge the trajectory rather than pursue the iconoclast path. At least for this unit, which has a history of iconoclastic success bringing little personal benefit.

So OP, my question is how you and others you know manage the onslaught of metacognition assimilation this knowledge brings on? I sought the kind of experiences I am having now all my life, but I suspect I would have lost my gourd if I had them twenty years ago. I know this is how the world is going to change. I want to understand more how it feels for other people. Any thoughts?

Find ways to simplify the complexity. Perhaps it is only an 'onslaught' because you haven't found a good representation for it.

A relevant quote from "The Distant Memory"

And just then he understood. The photographer was happy because he found a way to represent the complexities of human relationships with a simple photograph. They were something he looked at every day. His eyes would process an image while his mind processed the emotions that it represented. He didn't need to think about the details of each relationship, the kind of density that plagued Levi in his trial. He understood that the photographer was happy because he had found a way to balance what was complex with something simple. A photograph.

'If a picture was worth a thousand words,' he thought, 'there was no need to remember the words. Just remember the picture.'

He also understood that the banker was stressed and did not seem very satisfied in his life because he had had not found simplicity, or a way to represent the complexities of his job, and thus balance the two opposing forces. The complexity was weighing him down. It was dense. It weighed on his thoughts and his emotions, and possibly even his health, eventually. He hadn't found his 'photograph' yet.

I get that part too - it's the fact that the simplicity is infinitely scalable. I'm not worried about me. I'm worried about others. I am at nature a teacher - not of this matter, but good teachers might all lead their students here eventually.

Do you see yourself in others?

yes.

Then if you're worried about others, wouldn't that mean you are also worried about yourself?

The Book of Secrets

the full PDF is again available at: [link to mindcraft5.com]

final version uploaded. made some corrections (grammar, typos, etc)

if you've already downloaded it, thanks for reading!

Last Edited by The Builder on 05/22/2015 10:02 PM

Please respond...

That's entirely what the last book is about :)

The Third world of three dimensions (space, time, and change) merging with the Secondary world of two dimensions (chaos and order).

However, it is one world interpreted, generally-speaking, in two different ways. There is no merging, per se. Only the expanded realization that we are already there.

There are no real dates. They're more like references in spacetime. But I do know that (as Chaol says) you wouldn't realize it because it's a slow transition. For many, the current world would be very dream-like to the perspective of someone living in 1995, for example.

(btw, "Chaol" isn't around anymore. My fingers typed what Chaol wanted me to, more or less, but for now I'm simply my own person.)

Note that I've changed the name of the book.

However, the PDF still has the old title (and everything else is the same)

Last Edited by The Builder on 05/22/2015 10:02 PM

Huh?

Who is chaol?

Are these channeled messages?

And what do you mean by "for now I'm simply my own person"?

I'm not sure how to explain that. I'll think about it some more. I would say that Chaol is something like my subconscious, though what was written was not "channeled".

The subconscious is far more receptive to what you ask of it then a lot of people believe.

Sometimes, but not today. While I agree the "we are one" conclusion is a good one, I find it better to operate as if we are not "one" in this plane. Because of entelechy.

I just remembered excellent advice I got a couple years ago during a mind-blowing yoga awakening period - "be a mother to your mind." That's the best I can do, but I think it's good. Even if we are teaching ourselves, bodies and brains are susceptible to failure and this is destabilizing material at first.

Information derived from The Book of Secrets, useful in a way that may be immediately obvious:

Your story is the logical expression of a geometric (indirect) interpretation

Less resistance (i.e. desire) = less complex structure

We don't perceive relationships, because we are the relationships

All of existence is 'contained' in the relationships of your story

I have been struggling with some thoughts, Chaon.

For example, what does it mean that my perspective "is all the same thing" and how to find balance? Also, how does Potential element differ from Representation?

What makes nothing the most logical? And most importantly, how does this relate to SPIR (or, whatever the "direct key/interface" to reality is, in simple terms)?

perspective is a logical expression of the geometric interpretation
less resistance (to thoughts, (i.e. desire)) = less complex structure
interaction forms relationships; you interface through representation
all of existence is contained in current relationships - it's the same thing
(you don't perceive relationships, because that is who you really are)

note the key here seems to be condensed into relationships experienced.
it doesn't matter what the representation perceived is, only that a relationship is shared between it and interpreted

if SPIR (the 4 elements) = a relationship, then ok, I get how that functions as a "direct interface." perhaps your next book will help with how so more consciously to affect it

so patiently waiting for the latest release to be free on kindle

i'm unable to access the link for the .pdf because i'm on a shared network

ty

The Law of 5/2 : No energy is independent of your perspective

[You perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive]

Everything exists within your current perspective - as a relationship

Reality is comprised entirely of symbols; We explore relationships

Interaction, the structure of potential, forms a relationship

The relationships are what we intuitively sense, feel and experience

The symbols are an interface for what isn't perceived. So?

You cannot perceive the relationships, you are the relationships

I wanted to check in. A couple months ago I decided to turn the ideas in this book to the outside world, not just my own happiness. I used many other inputs too. I created a vehicle of infinite potential. I have been able to fulfill my dreams on my own terms in a material way. I don't want to count all the chickens before they hatch, but WOW. Thank you, OP for the inspiration.

I know this is cryptic, but i got the impression from earlier posts that details about how individuals use the book are discouraged. Basically, the analytical frameworks allow me to harness the information in my brain, filtering for relevance and likelihood of success. I am fallible as hell, but the analysis is sound.

Op your diagram looks very similar to this! >New crop circle near the TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio) - 15 June 2015

I bought your book awhile ago for kindle. I just had a dream, and I understand math on a whole deeper level. I have to do some research and learn the nomenclature, but I get it. All about relationships.

Thank you op for opening my eyes to some amazing things.

Just a bunch of new age spirituality mumbo jumbo....

This is exactly what the Bible warns us about not to play around with this spiritual and demonic crap...

Yes the spirit world is real and yes you can interact with it but it is at your own risk....

I do not think these words mean what you think they mean.

Not all knowledge is forbidden fruit, even when understanding it takes hard work and comes with a delightful "aha' moment. Sort of like learning calculus or riding a bike.

OP, I just overcame my lifelong aversion to computer coding and I (we) will never be the same again. A million gratitudes.

Hi Chaon,

I thank you for giving us the opportunity to read your books.

I read your two books, "Ulysses and the Book of Secrets" and "The Book of Secrets".

The books are very interesting and contain a lot of knowledge about, our experience of "reality" that seems very well put, but at least for me, it seems very hard to make use of the knowledge.

Have you got some ways to graduate from just knowing to understanding?

Hi Thanks for the free gift. However, when I downloaded, it was only a 14 page excerpt. Is full version still available? Thanks.