YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAINS ARE WARPING! Timelapse videos. | |
Agent Smith 2014
User ID: 1332202 United States 07/26/2014 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 57697009 United States 07/26/2014 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shadow Beam
User ID: 60758158 New Zealand 07/26/2014 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shadow Beam
User ID: 60758158 New Zealand 07/26/2014 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nice try but video 2 blows it for you. The sky warps too. It's an interlace or a frame rate conversion issue, the ground isn't warping, it's the video. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57697009 So gullible bro. Try being a little bit of a skeptic once in a while. i have seismic data that proves this is linked to deformation! that end of the park wobbleing!! |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nice try but video 2 blows it for you. The sky warps too. It's an interlace or a frame rate conversion issue, the ground isn't warping, it's the video. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57697009 So gullible bro. Try being a little bit of a skeptic once in a while. The raw photographs are available in the OP. This has nothing to do with video artifacting. I made damn sure that was not the case here. You can verify this yourself. The point is that the warping affects everything. Like a heat wave. A mirage. That's what is going on here, roughly. Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 07/26/2014 06:48 AM |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 06:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | nope, they're not. Since its the entire image and every background mountain that are wobbling in sync, therefore it is due to camera movement. Quoting: Agent Smith 2014 I believed the same since I first spotted it. It's not. The warping, wobbling, bouncing motion is often - but not always - uniform across the images. In some places it is only the left side that warps, others only the right side. Please watch carefully. I'm a photographer, I know what I'm talking about. If you think it's a lens or focusing issue, please explain more, and be precise. Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 07/26/2014 06:46 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25702431 Sweden 07/26/2014 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Timelapse videos are not provided by USGS, NPS, or University of Utah (all responsible for monitoring Yellowstone) so I started making my own in March from the raw webcam captures available online. Quoting: AllThatCanBe Note, all timelapses are created from still images taken every 30 seconds to a minute, sped up to four frame per second, so each second is about four minutes in real time. Timestamp at the top. Watch from 02:19. Fullscreen. Watch from 02:15. Fullscreen. Trick of the light? No. Terrifyingly real. This is the live seismogram reading for the location in the second video (North East Entrance): [link to volcanoes.usgs.gov] From the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO) map on USGS: [link to volcanoes.usgs.gov] Exactly what causes the visual warping is subject to debate but I suspect it is an electromagnetic anomaly owing to the way the mountains seem to bend and curve. You'd think people would notice this, but it happens so slowly (only visible in timelapse, over several minutes at a time) and on such a seemingly large scale that there likely isn't much to feel. About time to raise the alert level from GREEN / NORMAL, don't you think? [link to volcanoes.usgs.gov] Of course, you should know... They can't do that. And they won't. Don't hold it against them, it's not personal. If they are wrong, there goes the economy, for nothing. Will it blow soon? Tomorrow? Ever? I don't know. I will make no predictions about when. But this has progressed since March of this year when the 4.8 earthquake struck inside Yellowstone and now the warping is downright obvious. All videos on this channel are Creative Commons license to make it easy for other video makers to share and incorporate the footage. All original frames are available here: [link to uploadshed.com] Here is a good post for the latest seismic and other anomalies at Yellowstone: Thread: Yellowstone Caldera - Hydro-Thermal Super Volcanic Eruption 2014 -update 10/07/14 - Eruption Drills, Magmatic Evolution & USGS Data Cover Up (Page 56) Almost every available sensor is going wild out there, worsening and worsening since the March quake, to levels not seen before. Disclaimer: I'm not a geologist or professional in this field. Simply a concerned bystander. Feel free to ask questions but don't expect anything in the manner of "expert" opinion! |
starsed User ID: 56298223 Canada 07/26/2014 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 06:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Op can you post a direct youtube link so I can copy for later i am on my phone Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60746742 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] And [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Op can you post a direct youtube link so I can copy for later i am on my phone Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60746742 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] And [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] thanks op |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
dr.hill
User ID: 10965458 United States 07/26/2014 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 07:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | nope, they're not. Since its the entire image and every background mountain that are wobbling in sync, therefore it is due to camera movement. Quoting: Agent Smith 2014 Time lapse on a swaying camera always looks weird. I knew this would be hard for many to grasp but you are wrong. I've been through the images in the archives and the ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPHS are showing these curves. One by one, they show this deformation, too. Here are the still frames for the first video: [link to uploadshed.com] Download them and go through each one as an image, individually... Then come back and tell me it's a timelapse issue. I've watched about 300 of these timelapses since I started them. I know exactly what camera movement looks like and when it happens. This is not camera movement. Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 07/26/2014 07:20 AM |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 07:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 07:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would like to see the video from the day of the big Earthquake? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60746742 Unfortunately I only started making the timelapse videos two weeks after the earthquake. That quake was the reason I started the timelapses. well I'm sure there will be another soon... |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 07:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fear that people are going to get caught in the illusion that it is 'just camera movement' or a timelapse effect. 1. It is literally impossible for camera movement to account for this warping. In the first video, you can clearly see how one area of the view changes proportion, while the rest remains in proportion. If it were cam movement, the entire image would move in direct proportion to everything else. It's not camera movement. 2. "Timelapse effect" is debunked since the original images themselves show this warping. No encoding or artifacting issues cause the warping. The only other possibility I can imagine is a lensing or focusing issue. Going with Occam's razor here. The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle (some type of weird electromagnetic movement that breaks the lines on the graph, not only pure physical movement). Thus, that is also what we can observe on the cams. And we do. Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 07/26/2014 07:33 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60746742 France 07/26/2014 07:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fear that people are going to get caught in the illusion that it is 'just camera movement' or a timelapse effect. Quoting: AllThatCanBe 1. It is literally impossible for camera movement to account for this warping. In the first video, you can clearly see how one area of the view changes proportion, while the rest remains in proportion. If it were cam movement, the entire image would move in direct proportion to everything else. It's not camera movement. 2. "Timelapse effect" is debunked since the original images themselves show this warping. No encoding or artifacting issues cause the warping. The only other possibility I can imagine is a lensing or focusing issue. Going with Occam's razor here. The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle (some type of weird electromagnetic movement that breaks the lines on the graph, not only pure physical movement). Thus, that is also what we can observe on the cams. And we do. are you kidding me you could see the whole mountain bulging.. I dont know if that is normal... but keep up the good work op. |
dr.hill
User ID: 10965458 United States 07/26/2014 07:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | nope, they're not. Since its the entire image and every background mountain that are wobbling in sync, therefore it is due to camera movement. Quoting: Agent Smith 2014 Time lapse on a swaying camera always looks weird. I knew this would be hard for many to grasp but you are wrong. I've been through the images in the archives and the ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPHS are showing these curves. One by one, they show this deformation, too. Here are the still frames for the first video: [link to uploadshed.com] Download them and go through each one as an image, individually... Then come back and tell me it's a timelapse issue. I've watched about 300 of these timelapses since I started them. I know exactly what camera movement looks like and when it happens. This is not camera movement. If that were real movement it would have been devastating. Any man made structure would have been destroyed. That would include the fire lookout tower this camera is mounted on. Not to mention the rocks you can see to the right never move. No rock slide or even one single rock rolls down that mountain after a huge geological tsunami? Sorry but I don't buy it. |
dr.hill
User ID: 10965458 United States 07/26/2014 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fear that people are going to get caught in the illusion that it is 'just camera movement' or a timelapse effect. Quoting: AllThatCanBe 1. It is literally impossible for camera movement to account for this warping. In the first video, you can clearly see how one area of the view changes proportion, while the rest remains in proportion. If it were cam movement, the entire image would move in direct proportion to everything else. It's not camera movement. 2. "Timelapse effect" is debunked since the original images themselves show this warping. No encoding or artifacting issues cause the warping. The only other possibility I can imagine is a lensing or focusing issue. Going with Occam's razor here. The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle (some type of weird electromagnetic movement that breaks the lines on the graph, not only pure physical movement). Thus, that is also what we can observe on the cams. And we do. "The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle" I don't see that at all. [link to www.isthisthingon.org] I can appreciate your effort but this is |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If that were real movement it would have been devastating. Quoting: dr.hill Any man made structure would have been destroyed. That would include the fire lookout tower this camera is mounted on. Not to mention the rocks you can see to the right never move. No rock slide or even one single rock rolls down that mountain after a huge geological tsunami? Sorry but I don't buy it. That's what I'm getting at. The title is a bit misleading but it's actually what is occurring. It's similar to an optical illusion but the illusion itself is being caused by Yellowstone's magnetic field going facking nuts. That is my best guess. Did you fail to click this link? [link to volcanoes.usgs.gov] You may not be a seismologist, but surely you understand that the lines are meant to begin and end at the same horizontal points? For comparison with a normal seismo chart at Yellowstone Lake: [link to volcanoes.usgs.gov] The movement shown on that seismograph (at Electric Peak, where one of the videos above was captured) is bloody unthinkable. That's what you are seeing in the timelapses. It is what it is (not entirely sure, I'll give you that) but anyone can prove that it is not an artifact, not an encoding issue, and not camera movement. I covered this above, but if you need more explanation let me know. |
Davos
User ID: 34840966 United Kingdom 07/26/2014 07:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60577242 Canada 07/26/2014 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I fear that people are going to get caught in the illusion that it is 'just camera movement' or a timelapse effect. Quoting: AllThatCanBe 1. It is literally impossible for camera movement to account for this warping. In the first video, you can clearly see how one area of the view changes proportion, while the rest remains in proportion. If it were cam movement, the entire image would move in direct proportion to everything else. It's not camera movement. 2. "Timelapse effect" is debunked since the original images themselves show this warping. No encoding or artifacting issues cause the warping. The only other possibility I can imagine is a lensing or focusing issue. Going with Occam's razor here. The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle (some type of weird electromagnetic movement that breaks the lines on the graph, not only pure physical movement). Thus, that is also what we can observe on the cams. And we do. "The seismos show insane movement, the likes of which the seismographs weren't designed to handle" I don't see that at all. [link to www.isthisthingon.org] I can appreciate your effort but this is Good, you're getting close. IsThisThingOn.org is third party, and takes its data from University of Utah. University of Utah seismographs are filtered and "compressed" via algorithms to block out background noise. However, even University of Utah seismographs show this anomaly for Electric Peak. [link to www.isthisthingon.org] Look at 21:15 on the right side (in UTC). See how the line does not match up with the time marker for 21:00? It has been programmatically corrected, but STILL the line does not match. This goes against the very logic of a seismograph reading, generally. The horizontal lines are sloping downwards and upwards slowly, because large scale, slow-motion doom is on. The YVO seismographs are 'raw' and less filtered. It is, how you say? Closer to the truth of the matter. Rest assured that USGS and U of Utah are shitting bricks based on those readings alone. Please see ShadowBeam's thread linked in the OP here for links to the strain and tilt meters. These sensors are showing bulging and physical pressure changes in the boreholes that are more rapid in a single day than the entire change between now and 2008. The data is all there to confirm that this is not bullshit, so do more research before you pull that flag out again. This thread is for direct visual evidence that SHIT IS REAL. Even if it looks like a trick of light, I've spent over three weeks ruling out the obvious that you have mentioned. Don't let your expectations fool you. This is very real. What exactly is it? I don't know! But I am certain of what it is not. It's not a camera trick or anything others have offered to explain it so far. Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 07/26/2014 08:06 AM |
AllThatCanBe
(OP) User ID: 60760835 South Africa 07/26/2014 08:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think yellowstone is gonna blow soon but... Quoting: Davos These videos do not show that, its the camera, use your loaf folks Been using my loaf for four months watching this. If you can't trust my testimony, then GTFO. I have explained why it cannot be the camera, as much as it may look like it. Ever seen a heat mirage? This is very similar. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37389491 United States 07/26/2014 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60750768 United States 07/26/2014 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60728947 United Kingdom 07/26/2014 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian
User ID: 60393587 Malaysia 07/26/2014 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |