WTF How did GLP miss this. 100 anniversary of Titanic ship WHICH NEVER SANK! | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1409715 India 06/01/2011 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1348215 United States 06/01/2011 07:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CelticLegends User ID: 1409740 United Kingdom 06/01/2011 07:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1409924 India 06/01/2011 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1409959 Canada 06/01/2011 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From one of the comments: I believe that the undeniable piece of evidence is that the wreckage shows the hull bulkheads – there is no question about that. And the bulkheads were installed on the Olympic after the crash with HMS Hawke to reinforce the hull structure. Titanic, obviously, never had the bulkheads installed. That’s it right there. |
WorldCraze
User ID: 1301812 United States 06/01/2011 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
oniongrass
User ID: 1193082 United States 06/01/2011 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So this theory is that the former Olympic, now called the Titanic, had been previously damaged by ship-to-ship collision, and TPTB knew it was going to sink this time. Given the lack of remote control at the time, it meant someone in the crew was in on the plan and was really going to sink their own boat. How does this explain the lack of adequate lifeboats? The plan was to rescue everyone? How does it explain the lack of rescue? The story that the prepositioned rescue boat ignored the flares is hard to believe. How does it explain some problem about bulkheads? I'm not sure what that problem was, but the Titanic and Olympic were supposedly almost identical boats. . DON'T VAX, PROPHYLAX! ____________ There is no anger in Me: If one offers Me thorns and thistles, I will march to battle against him, And set all of them on fire. But if he holds fast to My refuge, He makes Me his friend; He makes Me his friend. (Isaiah 27:4-5) |
SuperManny
User ID: 1361462 United States 06/01/2011 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1273724 Germany 06/01/2011 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1273724 Germany 06/01/2011 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1384946 United States 06/01/2011 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
gsbltd
User ID: 1410001 United States 06/01/2011 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP: this thread is absolute BULLSHIT. Every spring some idiot writes a new conspiracy theory concerning the sinking of the TITANIC that completely ignores established historical fact... and twits like yourself buy into it hook-line-and-sinker, and even worse, attempt to get others to believe the same lies you embrace so fully. I'd hope you'd try getting your information from somewhere OTHER than a spurious internet source and you may just learn something in your lifetime. I hope it... and, I doubt it. BTW: a ship's launching is NOT considered an anniversary of anything. The vessal simply moves from drydock into water... so the final interior fittings can be installed. In TITANIC'S case, this took the entire year, right up to April, 1912. In fact, many little finishing touches were still being added as passengers embarked. Paint was literally still wet in staterooms. AGAIN: GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT befor you make an even bigger ass of yourself publicly online. Incidentally: there were THREE ships that White Star constructed with all being very similar in appearance. Both of TITANIC'S sister-ships, the OLYMPIC and the BRITTANIC made many safe crossings. The BRITTANIC was turned into a hospital ship during WWI and sank in 1916 after hitting a mine off the coast Greece. The OLYMPIC however, sailed until 1935. When White Star merged with Cunard in 1934, that merger sealed her fate and she was decommissioned with the new maritime corporation putting all their money into finishing up the new Grande Dame of the seas, the QUEEN MARY. Last Edited by GSB/LTD on 06/01/2011 12:38 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1294624 United States 06/01/2011 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Xenia
User ID: 1381331 United States 06/01/2011 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
arosebyanyothername
User ID: 1400654 United States 06/01/2011 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1400489 United States 06/01/2011 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1156730 United Kingdom 06/01/2011 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1294624 United States 06/01/2011 12:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WoW! This is why they probably made the movie 'Titanic'to further obscure the truth by adding shingles to the public perception memory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1294624Here is a link to the damage. Note the steel plates and compare to the titanic. [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1393262 Australia 06/01/2011 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was a plausible theory until it was discovered that the shipwreck at the bottom of the Atlantic does not bear the few unique features of the Olympic's bridge Unless they switched the blueprints as well, which is also possible if you're going to switch the ships like that I just don't know |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1384946 United States 06/01/2011 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP: this thread is absolute BULLSHIT. Every spring some idiot writes a new conspiracy theory concerning the sinking of the TITANIC that completely ignores established historical fact... and twits like yourself buy into it hook-line-and-sinker, and even worse, attempt to get others to believe the same lies you embrace so fully. Quoting: gsbltdI'd hope you'd try getting your information from somewhere OTHER than a spurious internet source and you may just learn something in your lifetime. I hope it... and, I doubt it. BTW: a ship's launching is NOT considered an anniversary of anything. The vessal simply moves from drydock into water... so the final interior fittings can be installed. In TITANIC'S case, this took the entire year, right up to April, 1912. In fact, many little finishing touches were still being added as passengers embarked. Paint was literally still wet in staterooms. AGAIN: GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT befor you make an even bigger ass of yourself publicly online. Good Grief dude, lighten up. Life should not be seen as anything but pure entertainment... (or something like that) -George Carlin |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204747 Canada 06/01/2011 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1400489 United States 06/01/2011 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
gsbltd
User ID: 1410001 United States 06/01/2011 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | UMMM: the "last survivor" was all of 3 months old when the ship went down. God, you people are foolish. Last Edited by GSB/LTD on 06/01/2011 12:58 PM |
WizzleDizzle
User ID: 1003430 United States 06/01/2011 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Holy crap. I just had my mind blown- never have I heard this theory... Quoting: Xenia3000 survival books, manuals, guides and more in one place! [link to www.armageddononline.org] Your source for disaster news, preparedness, survival, future scenarios and more! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1400489 United States 06/01/2011 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1344543 United States 06/01/2011 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1410063 United States 06/01/2011 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know? J.P. Morgan owned White Star Line ships. J.P. Morgan was also the main conspirator behind the creation of the Federal reserve banking system. He was supposed to be on the ship but canceled at the last moment. Is it just a coincidence that J.P. Morgan owned White Star Line, the company that produced the supposedly unsinkable Titanic, and that it went down with his enemy, John Jacob Astor, as well as Federal Reserve opposers Guggenheim and Strauss? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1410008 United States 06/01/2011 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | whoa dude! This is absolutely shocking because it makes so much damn sense. Why not have the appropriate number of lifeboats on board? omg. sick fucks. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1409959From one of the comments: I believe that the undeniable piece of evidence is that the wreckage shows the hull bulkheads – there is no question about that. And the bulkheads were installed on the Olympic after the crash with HMS Hawke to reinforce the hull structure. Titanic, obviously, never had the bulkheads installed. That’s it right there. Don't forget the M and the P under the rivetted Titanic nameplate on the bow. I'm in the marine insurance business as an investigator, this sounds totally possible to me. And hello, take a look at JP Morgan's track record, it speaks for itself. Lot's of anti Fed Reserve people aboard, go figure. Almost like a 9/11 hit, look who they got rid of with that one. Totally messed up, these are very evil bastards. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1399753 United Kingdom 06/01/2011 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Erm both he ships are different. There decks were completely different layouts. [link to www.20thcenturyliners.com] [link to www.20thcenturyliners.com] just look at the pics. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1410008 United States 06/01/2011 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Erm both he ships are different. There decks were completely different layouts. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1399753[link to www.20thcenturyliners.com] [link to www.20thcenturyliners.com] just look at the pics. So what are you trying to say? |