Hmmm.

Disabled. Who says? The status quo? How do we know they aren't evolving? So they can't sit still, can't focus for long periods of time (which I don't buy, I think they can IF it's something that interests them and the bunk they are fed isn't stimulating enough for them) and have difficulties with speech.

Ever met any of these kids? Their imaginations are OUT OF THIS WORLD. They are active. They get very involved in their passions. What's so wrong with that? Why can't that be okay? So what if they don't fit within modern education settings? Why don't WE think outside of the box and instead of trying to label, medicate and treat them for being different, let's meet their needs instead in the ways that suit them (that means big changes in how kids are educated). See where it goes.

And parents are getting paid for this "disability"? I'm guessing the government just wants a list of names of these children and are basically paying off the parents to have it.

What about the ones that just sit in the corner and drool? Are they "evolved" too?



That's autism (extreme at that if you're in a corner drooling), not ADHD. Huge difference between full blown autism and ADHD. Do some research. A lot of it apparently.

OPs like you are the reason many hesitate to put out a thoughtful post, it just turns out to be a waste of time when the OP has an agenda and isn't open to discussing and learning. Later.