| Users Online Now: 2,282 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,017,068 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,696,040 | Threads Today: 686 | Posts Today: 12,210 |
| 04:50 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,282 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,017,068 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,696,040 | Threads Today: 686 | Posts Today: 12,210 |
| 04:50 PM | ||
Do you support the ideology of the "Secret Holders Groups"? | |
| PlanetaryStorm
Offer Upgrade  User ID: 846246  Portugal12/21/2009 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you support the ideology of the "Secret Holders Groups"? We know, at least I'm positive that such is true, that there are some groups, or group with many faces, that hold huge secrets. Okay, I'm not talking about those Elites who want to control the Human kind for profit or simple power craze. Not talking about the ones that have no respect for Life. The one I'm talking about are most probably also against such thing, or maybe in the "grey/no-influence" area. I'm talking about "those groups" that hold information about HUGE things, some of those that are being questioned for ages, some of those so hidden (or not) that don't even cross the mind. (If a Mod/Admin feels like putting a Yes/No/Blank poll here, it would be great  )my GLP e-mail is on my profile. Be free to contact me for anything but spam. The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -Oscar Wilde In Lak’esh |
| PlanetaryStorm
(OP) User ID: 846246 Portugal12/21/2009 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know that the Human kind has the right to know the Truth, but I also know how we, the Humans, are. I'm sure that there are some "secrets" that are so HUGE and live changing, that revealing those at this time, would be way worst than holding them secret. I find knowledge a very interesting thing, since it can be both Positive and Negative to extremes. If such group exist without intent of holding Power or profit, then they should have their good reasons for not disclosing some things, and rather let that surface slowly by the hands of the people alone. The breakthroughs in conscientiousness for the general population (you know... those we could call sheep or drones) would be fatal in so many ways... The Path is more important than the Goal. So, my answer is: If the group is righteous and the reasons for non-interaction are valid, I do support it. Then again, all this is hypothetical. I really hope that such group exists, and not just mad power-hungry ones. Last Edited by PlanetaryStorm on 12/21/2009 04:56 PM my GLP e-mail is on my profile. Be free to contact me for anything but spam. The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -Oscar Wilde In Lak’esh |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 845503  United States12/21/2009 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| PlanetaryStorm
(OP) User ID: 846246 Portugal12/21/2009 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are "messengers". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 845503But, the messages are for individuals, not groups or the general public. There are very specific reasons why it must remain so.  Gah! Love that answer! my GLP e-mail is on my profile. Be free to contact me for anything but spam. The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -Oscar Wilde In Lak’esh |
| nzreva
User ID: 798627 United States12/21/2009 05:00 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know that the Human kind has the right to know the Truth, but I also know how we, the Humans, are. Quoting: PlanetaryStormI'm sure that there are some "secrets" that are so HUGE and live changing, that revealing those at this time, would be way worst than holding them secret. I find knowledge a very interesting thing, since it can be both Positive and Negative to extremes. If such group exist without intent of holding Power or profit, then they should have their good reasons for not disclosing some things, and rather let that surface slowly by the hands of the people alone. The breakthroughs in conscientiousness for the general population (you know... those we could call sheep or drones) would be fatal in so many ways... The Path is more important than the Goal. So, my answer is: If the group is righteous and the reasons for non-interaction are valid, I do support it. Then again, all this is hypothetical. I really hope that such group exists, and not just mad power-hungry ones. I DONT |
