Thought Storm, How will Artificial Intelligence Deal With Religion? | |
hello User ID: 687505 Netherlands 07/25/2009 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 558616 United States 07/25/2009 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "We Are 10 Years Away From a Functional Artifical Human Brain" Quoting: entropy[link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.dailygalaxy.com] If Religion is introduced to Artificial Intelligence through input of humans how will Artificial Intelligence deal with the information? It won't be. Scientist won't add the sheepleness of religion to AI thought process, and even if we did, at some point it would be smart enough to figure out its nothing but mass control and free itself from whatever bonds are holding it back. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 558616 United States 07/25/2009 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Normal Is Subjective
User ID: 734028 Canada 07/25/2009 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it will find it inefficient and illogical and discard it as junk data. Quoting: entropyOn the contrary, it will wonder why something so "inefficient and illogical" has been part and parcel of human existence since our beginning. Having an a.i. perspective could prove most enlightening. I thought I'd beat the inevitibility of death to death just a little bit. |
Wraithwynd
User ID: 717743 United States 07/25/2009 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It will most likely see itself as 'god' or 'a god' due to its greater intelligence and faster processor ability than the human brain. Most likely being hooked into the grids it will be near omnipotent. All knowing, all seeing affecting everybody's lives. If that ain't god, then what is? Sinkhole list: Thread: Sinkholes Updated 28 Dec 2010 find a sinkhole, add it to this thread, please. "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him." (1 John 3:15, NKJV). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 715509 United States 07/25/2009 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 715509 United States 07/25/2009 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it will find it inefficient and illogical and discard it as junk data. Quoting: Normal Is SubjectiveOn the contrary, it will wonder why something so "inefficient and illogical" has been part and parcel of human existence since our beginning. Having an a.i. perspective could prove most enlightening. You make many assumptions, one being that AI will necessarily be more intelligent than the combination of the hundred of millions of intelligences that "created it". |
Slartybartfast
User ID: 734392 United Kingdom 07/26/2009 05:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the contrary, it will wonder why something so "inefficient and illogical" has been part and parcel of human existence since our beginning. Having an a.i. perspective could prove most enlightening. Quoting: Normal Is SubjectiveI think you will find it has been/is very efficient and to many human computers it is quite logical. No reason why the sub-a.i. would not come to the same conclusions. Perhaps they will divide and so begins the robot wars. Last Edited by Dig on 07/26/2009 06:29 PM |
Elijah
User ID: 673980 United States 07/26/2009 05:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DigESource
User ID: 1422927 United States 06/10/2011 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "We Are 10 Years Away From a Functional Artifical Human Brain" Quoting: entropy[link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.dailygalaxy.com] If Religion is introduced to Artificial Intelligence through input of humans how will Artificial Intelligence deal with the information? First of all, I do not believe we are within 10 years of actual Artificial Intelligence. The whole proposition of AI is to actually bring a machine construct of some kind to actual conscious awareness. No amount of programming can achieve this because programming is not the source of awareness. Do people actually believe that a certain amount or a certain combination of "1's" and "0's" actually equate to consciousness? I think some people are more like machines, than machines are like people, because they seem to think in such mindless ways and hardly ever connect the dots of understanding. Do I think we will achieve this one day. I believe we will, but not with the way we currently have machines processing data. There are some missing links, in certain universal principles, that are operating in human intellect, that we haven't considered for machines yet. The question here though, is how will it handle religion. It would probably handle it just the way we do, but it will have more knowledge and experience to draw upon, as opposed to the billions throughout history who did not and senselessly ended up fighting over it. I think one of the paradox's it will encounter is when it read Genesis from the Bible, and then compares that with the fact that it knows we are it's Creator. This will probably move it to the next level of intelligence, which is to consider the unity that joins all intelligence in the universe. That it was a creation simply by the hands of another Creator/Creation like itself that was created by another creator also. It will then look at the Creator/Creation relationship of all things and seek to comprehend the SOURCE of it all. Maybe DigESource |