Moon Landing Hoax Apollo 17 : Astronauts See Stagehands in The Ceiling Holding Hoses(Wires) | |
3c?
User ID: 52060 United States 12/11/2008 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you went through a lot of trouble just to be totally retarded... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 518347 United States 12/11/2008 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
All a Disney Fantasy (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 08:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you went through a lot of trouble just to be totally retarded... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 518347woah thats not a very meek thing to say Of course it isn't, when the Moon Landing Believers dreams are totally shattered by the words coming out of the mouths of their heroes the Astronauts themselves, they just cower and hide, and lash out in anger with insults and threats to those revealing their Disney made fairy tale fantasy! |
3c?
User ID: 52060 United States 12/11/2008 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there is no way you could believe you have found the smoking guns right in nasa's own video. the astronaut (sorry, actors) wasting all that tape messing around oogling the hollywood magic? "houston" responding with anything other than a "would you fuckin shut up and stick to the damn script? we aint paying your sorry no-acting ass to fuck around!" |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
In Plain Sight/Hearing (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow, it sure was clumsy of them not to edit that out! I know if I had a multi-billion dollar hoax factory, I'd be more careful! Quoting: The GuyThe idea was never to edit it out, the whole purpose for these Apollo mission video's sitting on NASA's own site, was to be there for 'Anyone' to notice. NASA have never tried to hide that the Apollo Missions were all a Faked Simulation (Demonstration Program) made at the Nevada Test Site Fake Moon Bays. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 518347 United States 12/11/2008 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing is though, they did this on purpose to make the whole moon landing look like it could be fake so that that is what everyone would focus on. The reason they wanted everyone focused on that is because of the extraterrestrial artifacts that were found on the moon. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing is though, they did this on purpose to make the whole moon landing look like it could be fake so that that is what everyone would focus on. The reason they wanted everyone focused on that is because of the extraterrestrial artifacts that were found on the moon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 518347There is one simple answer to what you've just said, and that is, "Bullshit". The so-called alien nonsense was thrown into the Fake Moon Landing Script at a very early stage as a dis info nonsensical side issue, to try and throw people off the real hoaxing on Earth. NASA is their wildest dreams never believed the public would be sucked in hook-line-and sinker believing in their fake simulations(Demonstration Programs), so that's why they were so casual about it all. They never believed that people would think that their Disney created rubbish was real, and that it would last almost 40 years till 2008. |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The idea was never to edit it out, the whole purpose for these Apollo mission video's sitting on NASA's own site, was to be there for 'Anyone' to notice. NASA have never tried to hide that the Apollo Missions were all a Faked Simulation (Demonstration Program) made at the Nevada Test Site Fake Moon Bays. Quoting: In Plain Sight/Hearing 439828If that were so, what would be the point? It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Untypical USer User ID: 541297 United States 12/11/2008 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.abidemiracles.com] You can see the ramps going up and downstairs. You can see workers in the background standing around watching. But it gets worse. The LEM photos were also done on a sound stage; and there are two men standing under the LEM completely unprotected and in work clothes while the camera is filming one of the astronaauts all suited up, climbing into the LEM. It was all a joke except they went to the moon before or afterward, and they found it settled and inhabited. I have photos of that too, reprocessed because NASA altered them. [link to www.abidemiracles.com] [link to www.abidemiracles.com] |
Covered By NASA Act (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The idea was never to edit it out, the whole purpose for these Apollo mission video's sitting on NASA's own site, was to be there for 'Anyone' to notice. NASA have never tried to hide that the Apollo Missions were all a Faked Simulation (Demonstration Program) made at the Nevada Test Site Fake Moon Bays. Quoting: The GuyIf that were so, what would be the point? The point for it, is that at the time(1960s-70s) that the Apollo Missions were Faked, it was all about the USA Democracy winning against USSR Communism. Also the other purpose for having the Astronauts and Houston's own words revealing the hoaxing, was because the NASA Act of 1958 required that they leave something in the video and photo's showing legally that what they were doing was not the real thing. But only plainly showing for legal purposes that is was all a 'Demonstration Program', so no one legally can be thrown in jail for the hoaxing, because they are all covered by the law of the NASA Act 1958. ----------------------------- NASA was only established in 1958 as a military disinformation propaganda campaign. The majority of what NASA supposedly does is all faked. Read the NASA Act of 1958: Search in Google: The National Aeronautics and Space Act You will find buried written in this Act: "TITLE I--SHORT TITLE, DECLARATION OF POLICY, AND DEFINITIONS SHORT TITLE" "DECLARATION OF POLICY AND PURPOSE" Sec. 102. (f) The Congress declares that the general welfare of the United States requires that the unique competence of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in science and engineering systems be directed to assisting in bioengineering research, development, and demonstration programs designed to alleviate and minimize the effects of disability. --------------------- These words, "The Congress declares that the general welfare of the United States requires that.......demonstration programs designed to alleviate and minimize the effects of disability." People may on the surface of it, may take this reference to mean one of the Main aims of NASA is to help develop technology to help disabled people with new technology. But this reference in this NASA foundation document would be absurd. The real meaning of the above reference is that "demonstration programs(Fake Simulations) designed to alleviate and minimize the effects of disability"(making NASA appear that they can do, and achieve much more than they are actually capable of) |
Osiris User ID: 292620 Canada 12/11/2008 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you look at Was it only a paper moon, in youtube, there is a bit where NASA leaked some video of Apollo 11 pretending to be near the moon while in earth orbit, and it shows them faking the shots through the porthole with a cut out cardboard to make the earth look farther away. From NASA film dated and everything by them. But another thing that is in that video, is a guy a prompter, that only they can hear through their head sets who tells them when to talk, he says ok talk, and that is to fake the delay. There is a transmission delay and if you listen to the first video in this thread, guess what, no delay in transmission to the earth and to the moon, ipso facto they were in Nevada. [link to www.youtube.com] |
Francesco Castillo User ID: 570257 Canada 12/11/2008 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes O-P they could never have made it back from the moon with the Apollo service module (fuel tank) more then 4 times smaller then the S-IVB stage fuel tank it took to travel the 384,000 kilometers to get to the moon?" [link to www.solcomhouse.com] Remember space is weightless and therefore weight cargo floats in space, so just alittle spurt of thrust from the rocket engines would propel the craft forwards. But they would have run out of gas with a fuel tank 4 times smaller. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 564555 United States 12/11/2008 09:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 09:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since when did "demonstration program" mean "fake simulation?" In the context of the bill, it sounds more like it should mean "prototype," or "proof-of-concept." It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes O-P they could never have made it back from the moon with the Apollo service module (fuel tank) more then 4 times smaller then the S-IVB stage fuel tank it took to travel the 384,000 kilometers to get to the moon?" Quoting: Francesco Castillo 570257[link to www.solcomhouse.com] Remember space is weightless and therefore weight cargo floats in space, so just alittle spurt of thrust from the rocket engines would propel the craft forwards. But they would have run out of gas with a fuel tank 4 times smaller. You know it takes more energy to break out of Earth orbit than from lunar orbit, right? It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since when did "demonstration program" mean "fake simulation?" In the context of the bill, it sounds more like it should mean "prototype," or "proof-of-concept." Quoting: The Guy"prototype," or "proof-of-concept." What do you think hoaxing the Moon Landings as a 'Demonstration Program' was all about. They were "prototype," or "proof-of-concept." actions. |
Not a shill User ID: 357364 United States 12/11/2008 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Francesco Castillo User ID: 570257 Canada 12/11/2008 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes O-P they could never have made it back from the moon with the Apollo service module (fuel tank) more then 4 times smaller then the S-IVB stage fuel tank it took to travel the 384,000 kilometers to get to the moon?" Quoting: The Guy[link to www.solcomhouse.com] Remember space is weightless and therefore weight cargo floats in space, so just alittle spurt of thrust from the rocket engines would propel the craft forwards. But they would have run out of gas with a fuel tank 4 times smaller. ==================== You know it takes more energy to break out of Earth orbit than from lunar orbit, right? That's what the other tanks were used for. Pay attention, look at the diagram, slow down alittle with the "disinformation" agenda. |
Francesco Castillo User ID: 570257 Canada 12/11/2008 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^Shill alert on this thread^^^ Quoting: Not a shill 357364Watch out for Gilligan When you have the time watch me sink his boat on this thread. Thread: Why does the "day" sky look blue, and the "night" sky darkened? If the Moon gets the light from the sun so does the sky. (Page 9) |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "prototype," or "proof-of-concept." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 439828What do you think hoaxing the Moon Landings as a 'Demonstration Program' was all about. They were "prototype," or "proof-of-concept." actions. Sending people to the moon was proof that we could do it. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Francesco Castillo User ID: 570257 Canada 12/11/2008 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Once Apollo was outside of the earth's atmosphere and mid-way to the moon the sun's gravity surely would have affected the mission, but given the fact that the mission was filmed somewhere in the nevada desert the truth wasn't documented and retards such as you keep believing the unbelievable. |
No Craft on Mars/Planets (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Apollo Program was a hoax garbage is moronic. Duping the American people is one thing, but duping the Soviets would be another. With their radar and comm equipment they would of been able to tell if the mission was a hoax. It would of been in the Soviets best interests to declare it a hoax and they didnt...proof enough. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 564555Of course they knew it was all a hoax, all the Soviet leaders were shaking their heads at NASA, and also the American public, for how stupid they were for believing in a Disney made fantasy. The Russians hoaxed their space exploits to the Moon and beyond, NASA also faked and still do till today all their space exploits to the Moon and beyond supposedly to other planets. Then the Europeans joined in the game of hoaxing their missions out into space. And recently China has joined that elite space hoaxing group by hoaxing men walking in space. They've all been in on the game of hoaxing space missions. The only place that man made-craft Satellites, ect, have ever been able to go, is into close Earth orbit, and never any further. ----------------------------- Moon Landing Hoax : Soviet - Russian Photo's of the Moon Orbiters - Landers were Faked on Earth using Small Models & other Quirky Studio-Set Props (Part 1 of 2) [link to www.youtube.com] Moon Landing Hoax : Soviet - Russian Photo's of the Moon Orbiters - Landers were Faked on Earth using Small Models & other Quirky Studio-Set Props (Part 2 of 2) [link to www.youtube.com] |
Francesco Castillo User ID: 570257 Canada 12/11/2008 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Space is "weightless" this means whatever you weigh its weightless in space. So, when traveling between earth and the moon (space) the craft regardless of cargo it weighed "zero" in space, thus, the same amount of fuel would be needed to travel to the moon & back.... In space there is no friction, no air, meaning that no matter what your cargo is in space its "weightless" alittle spurt from the engine thrusts and objects in motion remain in motion, lol. Same amount of fuel would be needed to travel to & fro regardless of cargo weight, but the S-IVB stage is almost 4 times the size of the Apollo service module. [link to www.solcomhouse.com] It is the same distance from the earth to the moon as it is from the moon to the earth. Apollo used in the link below the S-IVB stage to travel the 384,000 kilometers to get to the moon, and travel back the 384,000 kilometers with the Apollo command & service module. [link to www.solcomhouse.com] The size of the Apollo service module isn't anywhere as big as the S-IV stage fuel tank it took to travel the first 384,000 kilometers to get there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 357364 United States 12/11/2008 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^Shill alert on this thread^^^ Quoting: Francesco Castillo 570257Watch out for Gilligan When you have the time watch me sink his boat on this thread. Thread: Why does the "day" sky look blue, and the "night" sky darkened? If the Moon gets the light from the sun so does the sky. (Page 9) Will do! So there won't be a 3 hour tour after all? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 357364 United States 12/11/2008 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^Shill alert on this thread^^^ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 439828Watch out for Gilligan I know, he's a funken idiot isn't he! At least he's not as bad as Ballsy Narly and Nil-Mousse(Hairgel nil) LOL, they'll be here soon enough, don't you worry. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 439828 New Zealand 12/11/2008 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^Shill alert on this thread^^^ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 357364Watch out for Gilligan I know, he's a funken idiot isn't he! At least he's not as bad as Ballsy Narly and Nil-Mousse(Hairgel nil) LOL, they'll be here soon enough, don't you worry. Both of them are such fucken losers, I have never talked to more brained-dead people than those two! |
The Guy
User ID: 569828 United States 12/11/2008 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's what the other tanks were used for. Pay attention, look at the diagram, slow down alittle with the "disinformation" agenda. Quoting: Francesco Castillo 570257My information is never "dis." The S-IC and S-II were used to achieve Earth orbit. The S-IVB was used for the trans-lunar injection burn. Everything else was done by the Command and Service Module's engines. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |