NASA 2nd LIE: What does the Shuttle push-off to obtain propulsion? | |
Neil Armstrong User ID: 473887 United States 10/05/2008 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 471491 United States 10/05/2008 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man has never been in space. And everything sent in space first gets sling shotted off a planet. Or 2 or 3 Planetary sling-shot When a space agency (NASA, ESA or similar) sends a probe to the outer solar system (and beyond) it doesn't simply send the probe directly to its destination; instead, the probe takes a trip via some of the inner planets to help it on its way. The manoeuvre involved is sometimes called a sling-shot, sometimes a "gravity assist"; the probe dives in close to a planet and emerges going considerably faster. This is why space vehicles headed for the outer solar system commonly spend a year or three dashing round the inner solar system between leaving Earth and setting out on their long journey to the outer reaches. There are two processes at work here, each of which plays its part: one is that the probe gets far more effective use of its engines, the other is that it effectively steals a little of the planet's energy. I want to explain how these processes work. [link to www.chaos.org.uk] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 272356 United States 10/05/2008 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL, some people think those little spurts can lift the Shuttle that weighs 150,000 pounds? And lift it in a vacuum? A bird pushes air and propels itself air-born. In space the same bird could not propel itself air-born if there is nothing to push. Same for those spurts. Oh, and by the way, those spurts are beginning to look a lot like pressure release valves for when combustion of the engines reach high levels that pressure MUST be released so that there is no breach within the combustion manifold and thus are not compromised. C.C.C.P |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Were you absent in 3rd grade the day they Quoting: Anonymous Coward 272356went over what jet propulsion? Is this thread to lure idiots? I didn't have a 3rd grade astrophysics/jet propulsion class in my elementary school. Boy, do I feel jipped. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 373123 Romania 10/05/2008 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For those who missed the class and still want to know: - if you throw something away, you will be pushed back in the opposite direction with a force that depends on the thrown object's mass and it's speed. - The law of conservation of linear momentum it's what you really need to know - this is how any aircraft is pushed forward, by the mass of air or burnt gasses thrown backwards by the craft, not by the gasses friction to something. - so, as long as the space shuttle has anything to throw in one direction, it will be pushed in the opposite direction. - you can experiment on that if you stay in a place with low friction (on a boat, or on a skateboard) and throw a heavy object backwards. see what happens. |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, the space shuttle doesn't reach outer space. It is always in orbit and it never leaves the safety of our magnetosphere. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 500534Never. Or everyone and everything will DIE from radiation. Never reaches outer space? Boy your calling NASA liars too!! Only I believe they reach the outer space, if they didn't like all airplane don't, they'd fall right back. And radiation is not a problem with the radiation suits they wear and those huge Foster Grant's on the helmets. Only outer-space is not like NASA told us it is, there are gases in space, or the Shuttle could never produce the thrust needed to push back into the Atmosphere and enter into earth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 272356 United States 10/05/2008 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For those who missed the class and still want to know: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373123- if you throw something away, you will be pushed back in the opposite direction with a force that depends on the thrown object's mass and it's speed. - The law of conservation of linear momentum it's what you really need to know - this is how any aircraft is pushed forward, by the mass of air or burnt gasses thrown backwards by the craft, not by the gasses friction to something. - so, as long as the space shuttle has anything to throw in one direction, it will be pushed in the opposite direction. - you can experiment on that if you stay in a place with low friction (on a boat, or on a skateboard) and throw a heavy object backwards. see what happens. No! If you mean the force the Shuttle throws is contained like the combustion in the chamber of a gun and directed to the end of the barrel, I agree so far. But the kick-back of semi-automatic pistol will result because that combustion and bullet hit the air upon exiting the barrel, if, there was no air, no gases, there would be no kick-back. Same would apply to the thrust of those engines in the cold cold vacuum of space. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 272356 United States 10/05/2008 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 373123 Romania 10/05/2008 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | dude, if I knew you are the OP, I wouldn't bother. do some testing. read that thread in the link above, you will see there that you are not the only one who knew shit about physics. The only difference is that those people ask questions to learn. I was only trying to help, but I feel embarrassed for posting here. Don't mention it! |
A Concerned Canadian
User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, the space shuttle doesn't reach outer space. It is always in orbit and it never leaves the safety of our magnetosphere. Quoting: PunisherNever. Or everyone and everything will DIE from radiation. Never reaches outer space? Boy your calling NASA liars too!! Only I believe they reach the outer space, if they didn't like all airplane don't, they'd fall right back. And radiation is not a problem with the radiation suits they wear and those huge Foster Grant's on the helmets. Only outer-space is not like NASA told us it is, there are gases in space, or the Shuttle could never produce the thrust needed to push back into the Atmosphere and enter into earth. No human has ever been past the Van Allen Radiation Belt(cherubs) and survived to tell about it. We just can't leave the confines of the earths magnetic fields. Nope. And those suits do nothing to stop the radiation. Nothing can. Ask the monkeys that tried. |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | dude, if I knew you are the OP, I wouldn't bother. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373123do some testing. read that thread in the link above, you will see there that you are not the only one who knew shit about physics. The only difference is that those people ask questions to learn. I was only trying to help, but I feel embarrassed for posting here. Don't mention it! You run along now, and let physics and aerodynamics to those who understand the order of the Universe. |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, the space shuttle doesn't reach outer space. It is always in orbit and it never leaves the safety of our magnetosphere. Quoting: A Concerned CanadianNever. Or everyone and everything will DIE from radiation. Never reaches outer space? Boy your calling NASA liars too!! Only I believe they reach the outer space, if they didn't like all airplane don't, they'd fall right back. And radiation is not a problem with the radiation suits they wear and those huge Foster Grant's on the helmets. Only outer-space is not like NASA told us it is, there are gases in space, or the Shuttle could never produce the thrust needed to push back into the Atmosphere and enter into earth. ----------------------------- No human has ever been past the Van Allen Radiation Belt(cherubs) and survived to tell about it. We just can't leave the confines of the earths magnetic fields. Nope. And those suits do nothing to stop the radiation. Nothing can. Ask the monkeys that tried. What are you saying? Speak clearly. That they don't Shuttle up to space? That there is no ISS? The space walk is a wire string in a studio? The Shuttle goes to space, the ISS is resting on the Flat Atmosphere of the Earth that is parallel to the surrounding areas of your own neighborhood. The Astronauts do take the famous 'Space Walk' once the Shuttle comes to a stop and walk to the ISS. |
Mr. Predictor
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 287257 United States 10/05/2008 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so, if a bomb went off in space, don't you think the parts would fly away from each other ??? "If there is a new fascism, it won't come from skinheads and punks; it will come from people who eat granola and think they know how the world should be." - Brian Eno |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 373123 Romania 10/05/2008 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | dude, if I knew you are the OP, I wouldn't bother. Quoting: Punisherdo some testing. read that thread in the link above, you will see there that you are not the only one who knew shit about physics. The only difference is that those people ask questions to learn. I was only trying to help, but I feel embarrassed for posting here. Don't mention it! You run along now, and let physics and aerodynamics to those who understand the order of the Universe. you really should do just that! We need a Greasemonkey script made for glp, to filter out BS by user id. Anybody interested? I can make it for free. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 272356 United States 10/05/2008 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
A Concerned Canadian
User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, the space shuttle doesn't reach outer space. It is always in orbit and it never leaves the safety of our magnetosphere. Quoting: PunisherNever. Or everyone and everything will DIE from radiation. Never reaches outer space? Boy your calling NASA liars too!! Only I believe they reach the outer space, if they didn't like all airplane don't, they'd fall right back. And radiation is not a problem with the radiation suits they wear and those huge Foster Grant's on the helmets. Only outer-space is not like NASA told us it is, there are gases in space, or the Shuttle could never produce the thrust needed to push back into the Atmosphere and enter into earth. ----------------------------- No human has ever been past the Van Allen Radiation Belt(cherubs) and survived to tell about it. We just can't leave the confines of the earths magnetic fields. Nope. And those suits do nothing to stop the radiation. Nothing can. Ask the monkeys that tried. What are you saying? Speak clearly. That they don't Shuttle up to space? That there is no ISS? The space walk is a wire string in a studio? The Shuttle goes to space, the ISS is resting on the Flat Atmosphere of the Earth that is parallel to the surrounding areas of your own neighborhood. The Astronauts do take the famous 'Space Walk' once the Shuttle comes to a stop and walk to the ISS. Outer space is where you are, that earth has no effect on. Or any other planet or what have you in the universe. The ISS and shuttle and satellites ect... are not in the vacuum of outer space. They are in orbit around the earth and are in constant free fall. If they were in outer space their engines wouldn't work like the poster said. Man has never left the protection of the earth to explore space. Our machines have. Everything that travels away from earth into the depths of deep outer space, hooks a ride around a planet for a few times(days...years) and gets flung to the next object out there where it again gets flung further. So the OP is right. The shuttle wouldn't work in outer space. |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so, if a bomb went off in space, don't you think the parts would fly away from each other ??? Quoting: Mr. PredictorYour mind is all-over the place, oh brother, let me contain your thoughts and attention so that your brain can begin to focus on reality. Why doesn’t a gun kick-back upon firing when the combustion and bullet are still within the chamber and traveling the barrel? Because it hasn’t hit the pressure of all the air surrounding the exit of the barrel within our Atmosphere yet. Upon hitting that pressure, the gun kicks back because it hit those gases. In space according to NASA where it’s a vacuum that bullet will fire out and project itself forward with the release of the gun powders explosion (provided other mixtures are added for oxidation) but upon exiting the barrel there would be no resistance, nothing in their way so the kick-back will not be manifested, will not KICK-BACK. Conclusion: the Shuttle's engines will produce the pounds of pressure they were designed to do, but if there is nothing to resist that thrust (space-vacuum), that big belly of a beast goes nowhere. LIE #2 from yours truly, NASA, a payed program from the United States government. "Have you been programed?" |
AnonymousCoward User ID: 513812 United States 10/05/2008 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you had a garden hose on the Moon,(hooked up to the lunar plumbing)and you turned it on full blast,would it A; just lay their? B; shoot around every way,like a hose on your Earth lawn? C; you would never know because the radiation has boiled your organs? |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | dude, if I knew you are the OP, I wouldn't bother. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373123do some testing. read that thread in the link above, you will see there that you are not the only one who knew shit about physics. The only difference is that those people ask questions to learn. I was only trying to help, but I feel embarrassed for posting here. Don't mention it! ------------------------------ You run along now, and let physics and aerodynamics to those who understand the order of the Universe. you really should do just that! We need a Greasemonkey script made for glp, to filter out BS by user id. Anybody interested? I can make it for free. Dude, this is my thread, "you gave your opinion?" Now leave! Let those who wish to discuss this matter profoundly with logic alone to do so, we all can read what you posted and wish you well this Sunday afternoon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 373123 Romania 10/05/2008 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 517463 Portugal 10/05/2008 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
A Concerned Canadian
User ID: 500534 Canada 10/05/2008 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your views of how a reaction engine causes the advance of a vehicle are completely false and distorted. Please study action/reaction. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 517463Stop PUNISHING knowledge! You guys are wrong. It's a legit question. You can't have engine thrust in the vacuum of outer space. Are you saying you can? |
scimitar User ID: 20949 United States 10/05/2008 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ok, I see. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373123It is YOURS! And this place is for entertainment. Quite funny. Look, I'm sorry. You want to disagree, fine! Make sure your rebuttals are scientific so that others can be challenged by them, and I will point out your ignorance like I do with Guy, I just love bitch-slapping that guy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 517846 United Kingdom 10/05/2008 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your views of how a reaction engine causes the advance of a vehicle are completely false and distorted. Please study action/reaction. Quoting: A Concerned CanadianStop PUNISHING knowledge! You guys are wrong. It's a legit question. You can't have engine thrust in the vacuum of outer space. Are you saying you can? Of course you can you idiot. The reaction against the force produced by the burning gas produces thrust. It's really very simple. |
Punisher
(OP) User ID: 517958 Canada 10/05/2008 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your views of how a reaction engine causes the advance of a vehicle are completely false and distorted. Please study action/reaction. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 517846Stop PUNISHING knowledge! -------------------------------------- You guys are wrong. It's a legit question. You can't have engine thrust in the vacuum of outer space. Are you saying you can? -------------------------------------- Of course you can you idiot. The reaction against the force produced by the burning gas produces thrust. It's really very simple. Thrust against nothing? Pulleeezzzzzz!!!!!!!! And achieve something? Go away with your fairytales!!!!! Tells all how Peter Pan floats around, lol, at you!!!!!!! |