WHO DO YOU THINK ANTICHRIST IS ???

Any satanist, semitists, athiests really are anit-christ

And the Muslims will praise him as Mahdi. Must.

Who can pull this off?

So why do the jews here keep calling him a Muslim?



Because they think he's the wrong color?

King Charles to hold behind the scenes talks later this month with Arab leaders to discuss a plan for peace in Gaza

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

Exactly.

More trips to Jizzrael will be coming as well for both Queen Charles the Turd and Princess Faux Will of I Am.

Daniel 9.27
He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him. ”

Great.
But it was Nero.

AI

here is a similar one from the old site
[link to christiancourier.com (secure)]
"First, there is no one specific person denominated “the antichrist” in the New Testament. Rather, John declares that “many antichrists” have arisen (1 John 2:18; 2 John 7).

Second, the Bible does not suggest that a mysterious antichrist is some sinister personage who is to appear in the late twentieth century. There were many antichrists in the first century. “[E]ven now,” affirms the apostle, “have there arisen many antichrists” (1 John 2:18; 4:3).

A careful analysis of John’s references to “antichrist” reveals that the term is a general designation employed to suggest a spirit of unbelief that can be manifested in a variety of ways, both in the past and present."

[link to www.gci.org (secure)]
\
There is biblical as well as historical precedent for describing the appearance of an evil ruler who would challenge the worship of God. Based on the biblical material, we can appropriately call him “the man of sin.” However, while the biblical allusions to this individual, individuals or system are interesting, the prophecy is not specific enough to identify any person, government or other entity as “the” man of sin or the abomination of desolation.


Both Old and New Testaments speak of an individual, representing a system of evil – symbolizing sinfulness – who would arise in the “last days.” Some Jewish apocalyptic writings describe this man of evil as a revived Roman emperor Nero coming from Babylon (Sibylline Oracles 5:143-148). The source of this belief in a “man of sin” goes back to Daniel. He had spoken of a fierce king who would arise at the time of the end. This king “will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods. He will be successful until the time of wrath is completed” (Daniel 11:36).

The apostle Paul refers to a “man of lawlessness” or “man of sin” in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12. Sometimes this person is called the “antichrist,” though Paul does not use that word. Paul said that something was holding back this individual from accomplishing his evil deeds. The implication is that the restrainer, and thus the “man of lawlessness,” was alive in Paul’s day. Paul was concerned with someone living in his day, not in the future. Yet, Paul wrote of this “man of lawlessness” as though he would be revealed in the day of the Lord (2 Thessalonians 2:3), which Paul said had not yet arrived

[link to christiancourier.com (secure)]
The dispensational notion of a single, modern “Antichrist” is, therefore, entirely without biblical support. The designation refers to an attitude/action applicable to a wide variety of Christian enemies—not to a particular person per se. In principle, of course, there are “antichrists” today, and, as indicated above, their kind has been around since the dawn of Christianity. Anyone who opposes the Lord Jesus, and the teaching that derives from him, is, in point of fact, antichrist, i.e., against Jesus Christ.