Air Defender, NATO’s largest Air “Defense” exercise ever held, surpassing even the 80’s era REFORGERs, begins in just 72 Hrs.

The World.

Yeah. I have a lot of faith in the women and Sodomites making national defense decisions, who sit on their phones giggling about picking down our economy over a hoax pandemic and injecting babies with "rare blood clot" causing substances that prevent infection from absolutely nothing.
"Limited nuclear war". WTF! Who use imposing limits on what Russia will do to defend itself from this aggression?
They're idiots. Nothing they do EVER works as planned.
Never has. Never will, unless the plan is actually to destroy the united states and Europe.. They're doing a great job at that.

These are the same folks who tell us to lay down our arms, and criminals won't hurt us when they see that we're unarmed, then they go teach preschoolers to sodomize each other, with adult teachers in the classrooms. Fuck these motherfuckers.

It’s just a special military exercises.

Airheads should be raising babies in the kitchen instead of whoring on tiktok.

"real world, not an exercise"

yes, sadly the potential for this to "go live" one way or another, is very high

That’s a head up

I think you meant Operation Reforger, not Regorger.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

REturn of FORces to GERmany

Ukraine will become a whore mongering / child sniffing paradise now. All the adult men are dead.

aren't you a little off the mark?
nato was specificly created to be an adversary to Russia.
and now, your are giving most of your command to Germany.
do you even grasp how funny this is.

Crimea belongs to russia



Crimean people voted to join russia, you see its called democracy that tel aviv ran washington, and london keep speaking about.

Hope it ain’t like the 1980s Able Archer……

They hate Biden so much that they want to see the USA burn

There's a few of them on here

That future tense is hilarious.

I really wonder if this Ukraine bullshit is just a way to attack Russia (Putin) because they are not going along with the New World Order.

DUH...YA THINK?

They already live in hell, why not make it a radioactive one? Joke of course, but seriously, this planet is no place for children.

Kushner, “played a leading role inside the Trump administration defending [bin Salman]” after Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, and urged Donald Trump to support the prince, arguing that the whole situation would blow over.

$2b payoff.. [link to www.vanityfair.com (secure)]

Ford: The Largest and Most Expensive Navy Aircraft Carriers Ever, within Striking distance of Eastern Russia.



Gerald Ford - The name alone tells you they get sunk.

Ford: The Largest and Most Expensive Navy Aircraft Carriers Ever - the slow floating pig boat. Hogs to the bottom of the sea.

The Nimitz Strike Group is in the North China Sea - Well thats a good place to hide gene yusses. Not

The newest charge will be Trump "Supporting Terrorists", jmho.

The premise of the argument presented in the quote you provided is flawed and factually incorrect. Here's a breakdown of the inaccuracies:

1. The argument assumes that NATO's Air Defender exercise is a precursor to NATO intervention in Ukraine. However, there is no direct correlation between military exercises and imminent military actions or interventions. Military exercises are routine training activities conducted by armed forces to enhance coordination, preparedness, and interoperability.

2. NATO is indeed a defensive alliance formed for collective defense among its member states. It operates based on the principles outlined in the North Atlantic Treaty, and any military action undertaken by NATO requires consensus among its member states. NATO cannot unilaterally engage in wars of conquest or intervention without the agreement of its member nations.

3. The claim that the "Obamunist Deep State" is involved in preventing the conflict in Ukraine from extending into the election season lacks substantiation and appears to be a baseless conspiracy theory. It is important to critically evaluate and verify the sources of such claims before accepting them as factual.

4. The statement that "Hillary, Kerry, Nuland, and others have said the US CAN WIN a 'Limited' Nuclear War with Russia" is not supported by credible evidence. It is crucial to rely on reliable sources and statements from verified individuals to assess the validity of such claims.

In summary, the argument's premise is not factually correct. NATO's military exercises are separate from the decision-making process for military interventions, and NATO operates based on consensus among its member states. Additionally, the conspiracy theories and unsupported claims mentioned in the argument further weaken its credibility.

Right after the Pride parade!

Check out the big brain on WEF fanboi Brad here.

Every single one of your criticisms is baseless and fundamentally flawed because they all assume every NATO action is limited by the wording of a particular contract agreement.

You're a lawyer who thinks law is what lawyers say it is, and it has the authority of God.

THE WORLD, PERIOD.