Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,816 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 338,661
Pageviews Today: 555,923Threads Today: 186Posts Today: 3,320
07:48 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject A Healing Place. A Loving Space.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
AC 469767 ~

I suppose, if Lotus were to say to me "I have no beliefs" I would ask her, what does that mean? Then, depending on her response, I would respond. I can't figure out what "I have no beliefs" means. There are too many ways I could interpret that statement.

I have experienced Lotus supporting many aspects of my path. I have not experienced the exact situation you have, so I am not sure how to respond to it. When I let any anger I had toward Lotus go, I also let go any arguments we had go. Yet, I am more aware of how to discern her words than before. I didn’t let go of the overall lessons, but the situations that inspired the lessons.

Lotus has described being confused about her path at this time in previous posts. So, by nature as we are in so many ways mental beings, naturally this is going to affect the statements we make. Yes, some of what Lotus has shared doesn't make sense to me. At the same time, some of what I share doesn't make sense to others. I have not completely defined my path either. With this in mind, I feel (and this is only a personal observation that Lotus may say is not so if she wishes to) I believe Lotus is trying something that I also believe Darza and myself are trying. This is to use a form of speech that completely matches one's understanding. This can be very confusing, of course. Sometimes I have substituted "I" for "one" or completely removed words like "I", "me", "you" to try to reflect an understanding of the unity we share in our speech. To try to make it my all (absorbing and reflecting). This makes things very difficult to understand for others reading/hearing it. In some ways, not in the same way, I feel Lotus has attempted to do this. What do you think?

Also, on the LW thread, a writer calling himself "M" declared that we are all Masters and that it important to see ourselves as such. I take a lot of what Lotus says as her affirming what she wishes to be, as she is molding herself to be it. I see her as a work-in-progress, as I see myself. I often look in the mirror and affirm that "I AM ONE with All-That-IS" along with other affirmations. Sometimes, I say similar things on threads on GLP and to people in my day-to-day conversations. I sign almost every post with "O!" meaning Oneness, rather than my name Allie because I am affirming I am of that Oneness completely. The more I affirm it in this and other ways, the more I believe it and act from it.

God does indeed speak to me. I do not affirm this in as direct a manner as Lotus does. For me, God communicates through me in the love that I feel for all things and in the connection I know that I share with all things. It is not a verbal form of communication. I believe God, Abba, All-That-IS, whatever one wishes to call “it”, communicates with all beings in this manner. If Lotus should ever say such is not so, I will repeat that I know this to be so and we would go from there.

It is very hard to affirm our truths and also not come off as egotistical, isn’t it? I have actually been accused by many as acting out of ego. The same words (written or spoken) have also, by different people, been interpreted as not coming from the ego. Our perceptions of one another are all so unique, aren’t they? Just how we all walk so different, we all listen so differently too I feel =D!

Without having Lotus comment on this all it is really hard to discuss this. In conclusion, yes, I am very happy that we see eye to eye. As a recommendation, I will suggest that you try to release the anger that your words seem to show (in my perception) toward Lotus. I don’t know if this is how you feel and don’t want to accuse you, but hope it is alright to show what I perceive. I also would like to share that I feel anger can be useful, but also (and mostly is) limiting. It is when anger converts into action, where passion for the action is the primary feeling, that I think anger is useful. Only then. Yet, I see also that discernment is key here. I will have to give this more thought if you would like me to? Would you like a hand in this? It is okay if not (if you have already arrived at a defined approach and would like to keep it).

I am glad that, for one reason of many, Lotus came into our lives. I feel that much is being learned (by me for certain) by having this conversation we otherwise wouldn’t have if it weren’t for Lotus.

hf
Thank you for listening as well!!
hf

I am having some very difficult times with my family right now so I might not be on for a few days to respond. Please know that I will get back to any posts directed toward me after I have helped my family to sort some things out.

Much LOVE to you, All, ONE!
Loving all our unique steps and ears,
O!
 Quoting: ~ Allie LIIS 469782


Dear Allie,

I am not angry at Lotus, I merely point out the discrepancies I have witnessed. I love Lotus for many of the same reasons you point out. These have been my experiences and I have shared them. Life's too short to hold grudges or to fiddle with anger. But that doesn't mean I can't speak my mind either. Maybe my views will help someone else, and if not, that's okay too. :-)

As an added bit of info, perhaps you would be interested in knowing what Lotus claims to be? I asked her directly if she was now The Paraclete as is written under her name. She said YES, she was told (by Abba) that she could now reveal this to the world. And she still uses this label under her name, so she still considers herself to be this. So unlike you who says you have not defined your path, Lotus has declared this path and label for herself apparently. (See Paraclete below)

Bless you and your family, Allie O...I mean this sincerely.

Paraclete |ˈparəˌklēt|
noun
(in Christian theology) the Holy Spirit as advocate or counselor (John 14:16, 26).

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

'Paraclete' appears in the New Testament in the Gospel of John (14:16, 14:26, 15:26, 16:7, 20:22) where it may be translated in English as "Counselor", "Helper", or "Comforter". The Early Church identified the Paraclete as the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5,1:8,2:4,2:38) and Christians continue to use Paraclete as a title for the Spirit of God.

In 1 John 2:1 "paraclete" is used to describe the intercessory role of Jesus Christ. And in John 14:16 Jesus says "another paraclete" will come to help his disciples, implying Jesus is the first paraclete.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP