HOT TOPIC: Is the USA population MATURE enough to own guns?

Too generalized to comment.

there are plenty of methods to kill which don't involve firearms, but those don't fit the agenda so we don't really hear about it when it happens.

For the most part I would say that anyone aged between 18-25 right now are total fuckups. The helmet generation.

Part of it is and part of it isn't. The problem is that if common sense discrimination were exercised, the anti self defense creeps who want to disarm everyone would eruption into violence necessitating their just elimination from the gene pool which would them be used as a justification by international and internal enemies to pressure anti self defense and slavery measures even more. And so on an so forth. Personally, I think we may as well get the party started for good or for il because the current and future world is utterly unacceptable without drastic change.

if you can't use public transportation or go shopping
without your emotional support poodle then
it's likely you can't be trusted owning a firearm.

The term Maturity is not quantifiable & a very odd one to use.

What's a "Mature Population" look like, aside from just plain old? Example?

The US government isn't mature enough, and that hasn't stopped them from having them.

"Is the USA population MATURE enough to own guns?"


That ain't the question.

Mature enough since 1776!!

Newsflash: 99.999999% of gun owners have never shot up a school, church, or nightclub and never will.

This guestion is glowie FUD.

This is a strawman premise, basically. It aligns with the notion of disarming everybody for the actions of a few. I'M mature enough, and I'm not going to stand for being punished for the actions of someone else.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

-Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1776

Yeah, yet it is my question....


Let me explain....


We have all these people screaming how many more of our kids are going to be gunned down in schools, before guns are abolished?

It's their battle cry. It makes those of us pro 2nd Amendment supporters look heartless....because that's all they've got.

The thing is, what they seem to be unable to comprehend, is that guns don't pick themselves up and shoot people. Guns have no maliciousness within them. Indeed they do not think or feel. They are tools of defense....unless a whack job has other things in mind.

And what will be used once guns are gone....bombs? Driving cars into playgrounds full of kids? I'm sure these sick minds can think of a myriad of ways to kill children/people.

Or would the killing suddenly and magically stop....because fucking (immature, "I'm the boss") legislatures got their way.

An entire nation of people unarmed, and ripe for the picking, eh?....

Why is it these people cannot see beyond their emotions?....it's ground in some form of immaturity.

I personally don't want these immature and single minded people making up my mind about my personal defense.


Like I said, I take zero joy in children being gunned down in their schools. Yet this call to ban guns due to it is so erroneous, like just about every other social issue today.

Where there is a will, there is a way. Who's going to win?

This was my reply in another thread.



As for younger people, maybe some changes wouldn't hurt. Some 18 year olds today just don't seem mature enough. But that's a sticky topic, because what about the men and women of our military? If you go with can't own a gun till 25 years old, what about people that get out of the military and are say 22 or 23? You telling me they aren't mature enough to own a gun after already being in the military and trained with guns?

I'm sorry but the right to self defense at any level has to be honored.

If you can't defend yourself, you have to right to your life... let alone liberty or the pursuit of happiness.

Any restriction on it makes one a slave, essentially.

We must cut off our dicks in to prevent rape

Last Edited by War Dance on 03/29/2023 11:01 PM

When I was a kid we took our guns to school, yup rifles.


Seeth lefties.....seeth!

On the school bus, with the full knowledge of the driver,
'the teachers, and the principal.

No one ever got shot at school.

Seeth lefties.....seeth!

Here's a better question: "Should the government be entrusted with a monopoly of force?"

The obvious answer, is no. International globalist elites have subverted the western world. Every level of government and media is filled with corruption. Is it a good idea to take the guns away from the people, so that only the stormtroopers of the corrupt ruling class have them? No. It's not.

It's times like this I wish we could rate individual posts.

I would give yours five stars I mean five hundred stars!

Only democrats shouldn't be allowed firearms nor should their bodyguards/escorts be allowed firearms.

I have spoken.

Good day to you all.

What if you consider your gun your emotional support poodle?

A better question might be: "Is the criminal population(including those with uniforms) mature enough to possess guns?".

How about the political(criminal) class?

How about nose-glasses Schumer(he carries)?

If those creatures have guns, why not the rest of us law abiding folks?

Actually, it's irrelevant. The constitution guarantees the right to carry/bear arms.

Based on the material posted by both AC's and GLP Members, there are very few that would be able to obtain weapons if they ever go to checking out web history of applicants. Very few would qualify if any.

Guns should be legal in every country. As criminals get a hold of a gun anywhere as they wish regardless if it's illegal or not.