Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,579 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 147,331
Pageviews Today: 249,992Threads Today: 80Posts Today: 1,528
03:16 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71221969
United States
03/21/2023 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
This Patterson footage is obviously a guy in a monkey suit, you can practically see the zippers..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85392008


Holy fuck you just need to ABORT yourself
MostHolyFace

User ID: 65207451
United Kingdom
03/21/2023 11:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Oh wow I love this topic....as a general thing not particulary this footage.

And have had real problems and tried a few times to post thread's and psosts on it, and ended up with autobans and unable to posts etc.....

I thought "bigfoot" had become one of the words, maybe it's one of their other names I used from memory when tried to add one them is on the list, anyhow there is a certain ranch where many wierd things happen next to a mountain that has them close by it seems certain, you cant put here...

Anyhow wont try again, as it never gets posted or such like, for anyone really really really interested in this, in modern times there are some serious researchers, who have spent years in their reported locations, and recorded their sounds and linguistics as such, and had presents left for them, for putting out regular food....and nothing to do with the ranch or exact location mentioned above.

Fascinating and very compelling stuff, eerie to listen to, including the recordings if anyone dares to search and will take some digging, dont expect first page of search etc... but it is there, very much so...

Has convinced me this footage or not if real or not, they exist...

May god Bless You

Last Edited by MostHolyFace on 03/21/2023 11:15 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80756814
United Kingdom
03/21/2023 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.


Looks like my Uncle, he’s a hairy bastard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80756814
United Kingdom
03/21/2023 11:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Could be Robin Williams?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/21/2023 11:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Ape Cave...which is on a map...on the side of Mount St. Helens

a group of hunters saw a family of bigfoots living there in the early 1900's made the local papers

bigfoots traverse through the underground lava tubes in the Pacific Northwest
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84954575


spock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80800443
Australia
03/22/2023 07:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80800443
Australia
03/22/2023 07:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80800443
Australia
03/22/2023 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Damn that gait is real close OP, REAL close. Check it out.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/22/2023 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Damn that gait is real close OP, REAL close. Check it out.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


Goofy Thum
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85484689
03/22/2023 08:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
I can confirm. I don't want to give up my identity on here, but let's just say that I married into the family that had something to do with the creation of the suit. All the players are dead now, but I will reveal what I know.

John Chambers, the guy who worked on the original Planet of the Apes, made the suit. He was considered top in the industry for making fake stuff for Hollywood. We are talking CIA level shit.

The reason I know this is because one of the guys who worked with him on the Planet of the Apes who was also top level in that regard and got work through him on stuff for the agency was an in law, now deceased.

The suit still exists. Whoever inherited John Chambers shit has the suit down in Hollywood. Can't give a name out. Shit will come back at me if I did.

Anyways, the guys all kept it a secret from the greater population for the fun of the notoriety it gained, but of course to those who knew them, the fact that it was a costume was known as there is always a bit of bragging close to home.

This, however, does not mean Bigfoot is not real. In fact, there are quite a few folks out there who have real stories about Bigfoot and detailed and very interesting when you go to the areas where Bigfoot is known to inhabit in the wild, so it is based on reality. However, as far as getting footage of him; that Patterson film is totally fake and maybe someday someone might get footage of Bigfoot, but he is nocturnal, so being able to film him in the dark without him getting suspicious of turning on a light makes it very difficult.

The stories I have heard when being in locations where Bigfoot was seen and heard include Bigfoot having eyes that are orange like a Wolf, nocturnal -- sneaking around eating food in campsites when everyone has gone to sleep and therefore witnessing is difficult. It's like trying to catch a raccoon at 2 AM when you are asleep, only they are much more able to figure out how to not get caught than a raccoon because of their intelligence level and awareness of humans and the threat we pose to them if they were discovered.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/22/2023 08:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
I can confirm. I don't want to give up my identity on here, but let's just say that I married into the family that had something to do with the creation of the suit. All the players are dead now, but I will reveal what I know.

John Chambers, the guy who worked on the original Planet of the Apes, made the suit. He was considered top in the industry for making fake stuff for Hollywood. We are talking CIA level shit.

The reason I know this is because one of the guys who worked with him on the Planet of the Apes who was also top level in that regard and got work through him on stuff for the agency was an in law, now deceased.

The suit still exists. Whoever inherited John Chambers shit has the suit down in Hollywood. Can't give a name out. Shit will come back at me if I did.

Anyways, the guys all kept it a secret from the greater population for the fun of the notoriety it gained, but of course to those who knew them, the fact that it was a costume was known as there is always a bit of bragging close to home.

This, however, does not mean Bigfoot is not real. In fact, there are quite a few folks out there who have real stories about Bigfoot and detailed and very interesting when you go to the areas where Bigfoot is known to inhabit in the wild, so it is based on reality. However, as far as getting footage of him; that Patterson film is totally fake and maybe someday someone might get footage of Bigfoot, but he is nocturnal, so being able to film him in the dark without him getting suspicious of turning on a light makes it very difficult.

The stories I have heard when being in locations where Bigfoot was seen and heard include Bigfoot having eyes that are orange like a Wolf, nocturnal -- sneaking around eating food in campsites when everyone has gone to sleep and therefore witnessing is difficult. It's like trying to catch a raccoon at 2 AM when you are asleep, only they are much more able to figure out how to not get caught than a raccoon because of their intelligence level and awareness of humans and the threat we pose to them if they were discovered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85484689


Very cool !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85484689
03/22/2023 08:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
The evidence of them is a lot of the so called skeletons of the ancestors of "man" that aren't the skeletons of the ancestors of man at all. They are much more robust and strong than human skeletons and are the ancestors of bigfoot, not man, so that's how they keep the whole thing under wraps.

What we need to do is get ahold of those skeletons of so called man's ancestors and run DNA on them and see if they are even human or not because if not, then that proves that something not human and not gorilla is walking around or was walking around.

I have heard a bigfoot story from Mongolia/Russia from over a hundred years ago, circa 1800's or so.

Story goes that the natives captured a female bigfoot in a pit and used it for labor and sex, resulting in an offspring that was passing for human and ended up in the Russian circus as something to look at...it eventually died and was buried and it's bones are buried there (the offspring).

The question is really -- how is it that they are able to mate with humans? And why are they so close to be able to do so?

Primates mostly have a different number of chromosomes than humans and therefore can not mate with humans, so what is the connection between Bigfoot and humans if they can mate and does that make them technically the same species as us but a completely and totally different sub species or race, so to speak.

I mean they are WAY stronger than us, WAY hairier than us, have totally different eyes and apparently aren't carnivorous or they would be eating us since they are way stronger than us and could easily kill us on the sly if they got the taste for our meat.

When you look at wolves versus dogs, you see the eyes are different and the strength is different and the shyness is different.

Wolves are nocturnal with amber eyes. Their fur is advanced compared to most other dog breeds. They are way more shy of humans and will keep their distance. They are more intelligent also. The difference is mainly that wolves are part of the natural world and dogs have been domesticated to be part of the human world for thousands of years if not millions for all we know.

So, the bigfoot -- in order to become human -- would have to be domesticated -- in order to become less adept at dealing with nature for survival -- and "someone" higher up the intelligence chain species wise must have been instrumental in accomplishing that level of domestication of our species.

Our species clearly has been domesticated and whatever domesticated us left us some of their dna inside of us as we have a proclivity to domesticate other natural species ourselves.

We would call whoever domesticated us "aliens" since they are so different than just another animal given their intelligence and proclivity to domesticate and alter another species away from nature and towards the world of conscious adaptation of the environment.

The idea that any species is an alien is actually irrelevant though since where a species orginates, whether on earth, in the ocean or on some other planetary body, underground or whatever is immaterial to the fact that they are essentially just another animal of some sort. Another planet, even if different, might not even be that much more different than this planet over time with changes that happen to planets over the millenia. So, alien or not, we are still just dealing with a species like any other, just more advanced.

Just like the beaver modifies its environment by creating dams and ants create tunnels, a very complex animal could fuck with dna and manipulate other species to its own advantage.

That could be in essence the species main developed trait; the ability to manipulate not only the environment, but the ability to manipulate other species.

This would require the ability to understand biology and chemistry at a highly intelligent level.

Any species that utilizes and understands biology and chemistry naturally as part of their intelligence and ability to survive could eventually evolve to manipulate other species at a biological and chemical level.

All species identify food by chemical reaction and this is the beginning of this type of intelligence. In fact, any predator who has an advanced olfactory system is able to determine chemical composition just by smell and this is common and complex in the predatory world.

If a species developed a sensitivity to chemical analysis using olfactory or even light spectroscopy using advanced eyes, it would be natural to evolve to use chemistry at an advanced level.

So called greys or aliens have huge black eyes with an unknown ability to perceive various spectrums of light that might indicate chemical composition. If they were able to see for instance the presence of the basic elements in the table of the elements using light naturally, they could figure out how to manipulate chemicals naturally and this would lead to advanced science.
rob2

User ID: 71381540
United States
03/22/2023 08:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
it's real folks...female, infant holding on.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71012774


yep!

see the boobs?
female
Page8844
User ID: 69474494
United States
03/22/2023 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
This one is pretty good. Bigfoot is squatting down digging in a hollow tree. Gotta wait until the very end to see it stand up.


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85357453


No need to watch, I have seen a person stand up before.
Tonight We Ride!

User ID: 77541527
United States
03/22/2023 08:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
dang
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77387136
United States
03/22/2023 09:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
If it's just a man in a monkey suit, why can't anybody replicate the hoax after sixty years? BTW, rough estimate of height based upon comparison to trees and average growth for mature aspen puts dude in suit at at least 7 feet tall. Arm length proportion and gate are also not physically possible in humans, so the suit would have arm extensions -- technology not thought of at that time. The thing has pendulous breasts that bounce just like a topless woman's, a totally unnecessary detail for the purpose of a hoax since it's moving away from the camera. They really went above and beyond on it.

If it is a hoax, it's the greatest hoax ever or near to it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77193870
United States
03/22/2023 09:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
This Patterson footage is obviously a guy in a monkey suit, you can practically see the zippers..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85392008


You can see the seem lines and form of the "shorts" area really well now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77193870
United States
03/22/2023 09:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
 Quoting: MonkeyWrangler


Two-piece suit.

You can see the shirt part shift over the pants part.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85206072


I noticed that too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82357180


thats a juvenile clinging to her back
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71012774


That's it.
Leaving thread.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85246241
United States
03/22/2023 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
This Patterson footage is obviously a guy in a monkey suit, you can practically see the zippers..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85392008


..You conclude this, after seeing a ‘real’ Bigfoot? Honestly, what’s your point of reference? Why would they put breasts on the suit?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/22/2023 02:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
...


Two-piece suit.

You can see the shirt part shift over the pants part.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85206072


I noticed that too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82357180


thats a juvenile clinging to her back
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71012774


That's it.
Leaving thread.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77193870


1rof1
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/22/2023 02:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
This Patterson footage is obviously a guy in a monkey suit, you can practically see the zippers..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85392008


..You conclude this, after seeing a ‘real’ Bigfoot? Honestly, what’s your point of reference? Why would they put breasts on the suit?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85246241


See poster above

"I can confirm. I don't want to give up my identity on here, but let's just say that I married into the family that had something to do with the creation of the suit. All the players are dead now, but I will reveal what I know.

John Chambers, the guy who worked on the original Planet of the Apes, made the suit. He was considered top in the industry for making fake stuff for Hollywood. We are talking CIA level shit.

The reason I know this is because one of the guys who worked with him on the Planet of the Apes who was also top level in that regard and got work through him on stuff for the agency was an in law, now deceased.

The suit still exists. Whoever inherited John Chambers shit has the suit down in Hollywood. Can't give a name out. Shit will come back at me if I did."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85493147
Australia
03/22/2023 09:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Local Australian version of bigfoot:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Btw I think the "breasts" a part of the brilliance of the hoax.

Like the poster above said, "CIA level shit".

stopposting1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80957163
United States
03/22/2023 09:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
If it's just a man in a monkey suit, why can't anybody replicate the hoax after sixty years? BTW, rough estimate of height based upon comparison to trees and average growth for mature aspen puts dude in suit at at least 7 feet tall. Arm length proportion and gate are also not physically possible in humans, so the suit would have arm extensions -- technology not thought of at that time. The thing has pendulous breasts that bounce just like a topless woman's, a totally unnecessary detail for the purpose of a hoax since it's moving away from the camera. They really went above and beyond on it.

If it is a hoax, it's the greatest hoax ever or near to it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77387136


the more you zoom in the more intricate it is
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85493147
Australia
03/22/2023 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
I know a man who saw a large monkey in a Victorian state forest in the early 80's, out stag hunting.

Didn't claim it was a bigfoot or anything, he said it "obviously" a released chimpanzee or similar monkey.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5461667
United States
03/22/2023 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
In a garage band I played the guitar and did a little singing. I wrote this take off on "Wild Thing."

Skunk Ape
You make my buns quake
You make my mind break
Skunk Ape

Skunk Ape, I think I love you
I wanna know fo sho
Skunk Ape, hold me close
Pop, I loove you, look out
<solo>

Fun times.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85458060
United States
03/22/2023 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Why have that extraneous bulbous bit at the front and to the right of the suit if it was fake.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


I mean why build that into the suit...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


banana2

Hey the only suit we got is the old lady with titties ape suit....that will have to do

banana2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85458060
United States
03/22/2023 10:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Why have that extraneous bulbous bit at the front and to the right of the suit if it was fake.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


I mean why build that into the suit...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


banana2

Hey the only suit we got is the old lady with titties ape suit....that will have to do

banana2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85458060


Yep...we dont need to fool evabuddy, just enuff dumfux to carry the story

s226
pump2
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 85373240
Canada
03/22/2023 11:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Why have that extraneous bulbous bit at the front and to the right of the suit if it was fake.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


I mean why build that into the suit...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80800443


banana2

Hey the only suit we got is the old lady with titties ape suit....that will have to do

banana2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85458060


bounceb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 85493441
United States
03/22/2023 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
Thread: Bob Gimlin is 90 years old, someone needs to convince him to tell the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80621426
United States
03/23/2023 12:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Stabilised footage of the Bigfoot film from 1967.
[youtube] [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]





GLP