[Update 8/13/23] End Game. SCOTUS in Violation of Binding Oath Of Office . Sine Pari. Abrogation of Oaths is treason

Today, three letter/affidavits were sent to SCOTUS on behalf of the Brunson Brothers. The affidavits were overnighted via USPS giving notice to SCOTUs that their decision caused them to commit misprision.

Below is a sample of the letter/affidavit you can use to send your own letter/affidavit to SCOTUS as one of We the People - When you sign the letter in front of a notary this becomes an affidavit. Sending this to SCOTUS, you effectively join with the Brunson Brothers as a Co-Petitioner to have SCOTUS hear and rule on the case, Brunson v Adams st al. that is still currently before SCOTUS.

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Attn: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas,
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.,
Associate Justice Elena Kagan., Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett,
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh,
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al - Case No.: 22-380 (Certified Mailing # Inserted Here - Optional)

Dear Justices:

This letter/affidavit is to express my support of the above referenced case, in reference to your recent decision to deny hearing the case, because I am concerned the United States has experienced a national security breach.

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit: “4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.” 1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.


There is ample evidence presented to SCOTUS to show that Brunson's claims have plausible merit. 388 elected officials collectively conspired to violate their oaths of office and you are hereby notified of this potential felony and treason by this undersigned “good citizen.”


The Department of Homeland Security has a national campaign to raise public awareness of the signs of terrorism and terrorism-related crimes called, “If you see something, say something.” This current case before SCOTUS leaves a most important question before the court, “What good does it do, if no one responds?”


“I, ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

I ask that you stand against the invasion and influence of foreign and domestic enemies, and uphold the Supreme Law of the Land by granting the petition. You truly are in a position that the world has never seen before and I pray for you and your just ruling upholding the Constitution of the United States.

Sincerely,

Name: Date:

THE REAL HARD TRUTH:

Folks talking, courts, or reason will no longer work. Our land has been captured and our leaders have no honor.

They've already done it twice they'll just do it again.

Complete waste of time.

They aren't going to indict themselves.

They've already done it twice they'll just do it again.

Complete waste of time.

They aren't going to indict themselves.

They've already done it twice they'll just do it again.

Complete waste of time.

They aren't going to indict themselves.

all you uninformed idiots. supreme court been compromised. and the brunsons are trying the old american tradition, it aint over till its over

Today, three letter/affidavits were sent to SCOTUS on behalf of the Brunson Brothers. The affidavits were overnighted via USPS giving notice to SCOTUs that their decision caused them to commit misprision.

Below is a sample of the letter/affidavit you can use to send your own letter/affidavit to SCOTUS as one of We the People - When you sign the letter in front of a notary this becomes an affidavit. Sending this to SCOTUS, you effectively join with the Brunson Brothers as a Co-Petitioner to have SCOTUS hear and rule on the case, Brunson v Adams st al. that is still currently before SCOTUS.

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Attn: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas,
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.,
Associate Justice Elena Kagan., Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett,
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh,
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al - Case No.: 22-380 (Certified Mailing # Inserted Here - Optional)

Dear Justices:

This letter/affidavit is to express my support of the above referenced case, in reference to your recent decision to deny hearing the case, because I am concerned the United States has experienced a national security breach.

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit: “4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.” 1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.


There is ample evidence presented to SCOTUS to show that Brunson's claims have plausible merit. 388 elected officials collectively conspired to violate their oaths of office and you are hereby notified of this potential felony and treason by this undersigned “good citizen.”


The Department of Homeland Security has a national campaign to raise public awareness of the signs of terrorism and terrorism-related crimes called, “If you see something, say something.” This current case before SCOTUS leaves a most important question before the court, “What good does it do, if no one responds?”


“I, ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

I ask that you stand against the invasion and influence of foreign and domestic enemies, and uphold the Supreme Law of the Land by granting the petition. You truly are in a position that the world has never seen before and I pray for you and your just ruling upholding the Constitution of the United States.

Sincerely,

Name: Date:

Basically in a nutshell it boils down to the plain glaring fact that We The People can see the SCOTUS have declared war against the very Constitution they are sworn to protect and uphold:

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit:
“4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.”
1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.

SCOTUS are just gatekeepers, they'll throw it out.

The logical conclusion is the Constitution has been suspended and we are living under Military Law.

Basically in a nutshell it boils down to the plain glaring fact that We The People can see the SCOTUS have declared war against the very Constitution they are sworn to protect and uphold:

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit:
“4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.”
1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.

It means the military is the only way. We are living in historic times.

OMG, scotus (some would say scrotum), just got caught.

They are totally fucked.

If they don't rule in our favor, they are guilty of treason.

To save their own hides, it is better to convict congress of
treason instead.

Beware of those that cast the first stone.

The law says, they must hear our grievences.

Who knew ???

Their own law is fucking them

I love it!!!

OMG, scotus (some would say scrotum), just got caught.

They are totally fucked.

If they don't rule in our favor, they are guilty of treason.

To save their own hides, it is better to convict congress of
treason instead.

Beware of those that cast the first stone.

The law says, they must hear our grievences.

Who knew ???

Their own law is fucking them

I love it!!!

OMG, scotus (some would say scrotum), just got caught.

They are totally fucked.

If they don't rule in our favor, they are guilty of treason.

To save their own hides, it is better to convict congress of
treason instead.

Beware of those that cast the first stone.

The law says, they must hear our grievences.

Who knew ???

Their own law is fucking them

I love it!!!

As much as I detest the FAKE GREENIES and their silence

about the pollution of the Baltic Ocean ( minor though it is),

and their POLITICAL SILENCE on the enormous Ohio POLLUTION-

Developed Federal case law allows the resident in the

Federal EXECUTIVE to be Supreme in FOREIGN AFFAIRS -

(destruction of an underwater pipeline) or even to the he point of ordering the launch of nuclear

Armed planes & missiles.

The Federal Congress can require the Resident to remove troops after 90

days & CAN write legislation to remove funding to any and all departments.

The Federal Congress can write laws and over-ride an Executive

Veto but it takes votes.

btw- as a side light to the division of the Federal Congress by

Republicans controlling the House, and Dims controlling

the Senate- SEEMS TO BE WHAT IS ENCOURAGING THE

UPTICK in the US Stockmarket !

Divided Goobermunt means much less legislation to harm the investor class!