And With Just One Zoom In: The Moon Landing Was Fake

They took a photo lab with them. Simple.

Just Zoom In the Original Photo

It's Fake

Find a hydraulic oil that works @ -250C. Good Luck. Are those Hydraulic Cylinders on the legs?

The LM had to be extremely light to get to the moon and lift off of the moon. The LM did not need super thick walls of steel it was made of thin aluminum and reinforced with spars and covered with another thin covering. It’s almost the same way houses are made in the US. Strong and light.

There is a reason why a heavy bathyscape was not needed to go to the moon. The pressure is zero, the mass required to protect an astronaut is relatively low. The nice looking pressure vessel was on the inside wall not the outside.

Also, have you been to Houston or Cape Kennedy? Look at the rockets, they are made of really thin aluminum. Up close they look like rather cheap corrugated tin, but on TV they look all glossy and shiny.

Have you seen an SR-71? Very thin walls were used on that guy too. Parts look like thin bent and riveted sheet metal. Not pretty at all, but from a distance it’s a really sexy smooth airplane. Mass is not good for aerospace systems.

Your answer is right there in the price tag.

Yes we are advancing fuel cell tech. BMW is working on fuel cell cars. The thing with fuel cells is it takes just as much energy to get the hydrogen disconnected from the oxygen as it does to reconnect it, there is zero gain.

Dopple post, sorry.

Last Edited by A Jackson on 01/08/2023 02:27 PM

ONE light source on the Moon. The Sun.

No lighting and no flash on Moon Cameras.


Shadows cast in multiple directions from multiple light sources.

It was ALL FAKED.




/end

Give a bunch of kindergartners some cardboard and duct tape and tell them to make a space ship, and this is about the level of workmanship you can expect.

Bob Lazar invented a metal hydride battery but it can't be sold because it contains parts used in nuclear weapons. The video is on YouTube.

Anyone who thinks the moon landing was real is completely retarded

You have no idea what vacuum does
to your nice little thin alu walls
.

Footage of astronaut getting back into lander.

Lol
Well I think black electrical tape would be better for outer space

L

They're not mice. They're Clangers.

If they'd have gone a bit further round the moon they might have even met the Soup Dragon, the froglets and the Iron Chicken.

where i grew up there is a big field infront of the house where ham radio guys used to meet up every year. the antennai they used where atleast 30 feet tall. They were just speaking to people on the otherside of the world never mind off world.

I see a loose external insulative covering similar to many satellites that also were designed to spend their entire working lives in space.

Here is what it looked like under all that.

[link to nordenretireesclub.org (secure)]

Stars are relatively dim and won't show up in pics exposed for bright sunlit objects. They require long exposures.

Bottom pic made by the overboots worn over the ones in the top pic. But thanks for proving again that those that argue against it know the least about the subject.

they weren't sending video back to the Moon. And they could afford a more powerful transmitter on Earth so the Moon receiver could be smaller.

Multiple light sources would make multiple shadows on each object. That is NEVER seen. All the shadows are explained with perspective.

So Grumman and the engineers working there were in on it? Or did they attach a loose external insulative covering similar to many satellites to a purpose built craft that looks like this underneath?

[link to nordenretireesclub.org (secure)]

By definition a vacuum, being nothing, will do nothing as it can't create a force, as it is nothing. The force comes from the pressurized air within pushing out. And those thin aluminum walls are perfectly adequate for that.

Not a pro photographer but that response above this one is serious? Is this person equating a cell phone camera to a high end film camera aka 'hasselblad'?

That said, would it take much to make adjustments so stars are viewable?

Aperture adjustments and whatever?

The dust cloud would have been amazing in a low gravity situation, literally covering everything.

Simply walking around would have made an incredible dust storm.

No dust means no moon landing.

It has to do with the fact it's all lies, bro! Accept that about this world.