‘Fully vaccinated’ people at 44% higher risk of COVID infection than unvaccinated: Oxford study | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84116510 France 10/03/2022 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at So then you go ahead and get the third injection, and I will get a total of zero injections, and let's run a comparison parallel data graph in 24 months to determine which one of us is still alive. Comments have been disabled. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84267957 United States 10/03/2022 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at So then you go ahead and get the third injection, and I will get a total of zero injections, and let's run a comparison parallel data graph in 24 months to determine which one of us is still alive. Well, judging from the article you posted, and the study associated with it... That's already been done. Maybe next time read the whole fucking thing and understand it before posting *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at So then you go ahead and get the third injection, and I will get a total of zero injections, and let's run a comparison parallel data graph in 24 months to determine which one of us is still alive. Well, judging from the article you posted, and the study associated with it... That's already been done. Maybe next time read the whole fucking thing and understand it before posting Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab was cooked up by big pharma to increase their profits, and decrease the population. Comments have been disabled. |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.oraclefilms.com (secure)] Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also to takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in supressing free and open debate on the subject. [link to youtu.be (secure)] Comments have been disabled. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81860532 United States 10/03/2022 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at but you need to look at the numbers.. im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this chance of death vax .00001% unvax .0001% then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment. |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at So then you go ahead and get the third injection, and I will get a total of zero injections, and let's run a comparison parallel data graph in 24 months to determine which one of us is still alive. Well, judging from the article you posted, and the study associated with it... That's already been done. Maybe next time read the whole fucking thing and understand it before posting Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab was cooked up by big pharma to increase their profits, and decrease the population. So...your taking the numbers from the study to "prove your point" Then turning around and saying the numbers are bullshit that contradict it from the same study...? A high BMI has been associated with a reduced immune response to vaccination against influenza. We aimed to investigate the association between BMI and COVID-19 vaccine uptake, vaccine effectiveness, and risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes after vaccination by using a large, representative population-based cohort from England [link to www.thelancet.com (secure)] Here, read the actual article discussed in your link. It's mainly based on BMI and it's effects on vaccine uptake. *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at but you need to look at the numbers.. im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this chance of death vax .00001% unvax .0001% then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment. Ah well if thats your best guess, who am I to argue? *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at but you need to look at the numbers.. im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this chance of death vax .00001% unvax .0001% then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment. Ah well if thats your best guess, who am I to argue? How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation? Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed. Comments have been disabled. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75752645 United States 10/03/2022 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at but you need to look at the numbers.. im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this chance of death vax .00001% unvax .0001% then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment. Ah well if thats your best guess, who am I to argue? How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation? Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed. Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes" *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65695331 United States 10/03/2022 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Basically, if you had the vax, any flu turns into covid. If you have not had the vax, you just get the flu. How do I know this? Because the people are required to submit a home test. So far, every one that has been vaxxed tests positive. Maybe any Corona virus (the common cold) attacking a vax'd causes the genetically modified system to begin producing spikes? At any rate, that's what I have observed. It's the truth, so help me god. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82617709 10/03/2022 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at That was already 0.05% Damn you are fucking stupid. You took an experimental drug for the common cold… Not really a shocker tho, you’ve been on my ignore list for years now. |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81860532 but you need to look at the numbers.. im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this chance of death vax .00001% unvax .0001% then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment. Ah well if thats your best guess, who am I to argue? How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation? Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed. Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes" The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended). I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you. Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life: [link to thecovidblog.com (secure)] Comments have been disabled. |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent. Quoting: Sol-tari Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab 60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at That was already 0.05% Damn you are fucking stupid. You took an experimental drug for the common cold… Not really a shocker tho, you’ve been on my ignore list for years now. You should log in then, save me the trouble of reading your replies. And I did...? Huh. Must have missed when that occured. Does not stop me from reading the actually quoted articles lol *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation? Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed. Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes" The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended). I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you. Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life: [link to thecovidblog.com (secure)] It was your article dumb ass You're pissed at me for pointing out your lack of reading comprehension on the very article you posted... And instead assume I'm not only vaxxed, but for it? I just can't stand idiots posting stuff they can't understand, that, if anything, prove Trumps Warp Speed Vaccine is just the bestest *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: DeploraVision ™ How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation? Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed. Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes" The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended). I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you. Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life: [link to thecovidblog.com (secure)] It was your article dumb ass You're pissed at me for pointing out your lack of reading comprehension on the very article you posted... And instead assume I'm not only vaxxed, but for it? I just can't stand idiots posting stuff they can't understand, that, if anything, prove Trumps Warp Speed Vaccine is just the bestest Name calling just proves your lack of intellect. I read the article, and all the links multiple times. ODDLY the government data after 3rd injection was propaganda because they were caught red-handed promoting genocide. Watch the documentary in full before you post again on this thread, and stop with the name calling. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Comments have been disabled. |
Sol-tari
User ID: 76314661 Australia 10/03/2022 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Sol-tari Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes" The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended). I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you. Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life: [link to thecovidblog.com (secure)] It was your article dumb ass You're pissed at me for pointing out your lack of reading comprehension on the very article you posted... And instead assume I'm not only vaxxed, but for it? I just can't stand idiots posting stuff they can't understand, that, if anything, prove Trumps Warp Speed Vaccine is just the bestest Name calling just proves your lack of intellect. I read the article, and all the links multiple times. ODDLY the government data after 3rd injection was propaganda because they were caught red-handed promoting genocide. Watch the documentary in full before you post again on this thread, and stop with the name calling. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Just because you try to come across as intelligent in your insults, does not detract from what they are. I mean, as an Aussie with difficulty in abstract concepts, ill stick with reading the articles and medical studies you posted here, that since you can't refute, are now trying to redirect to another source to "prove yourself" Keep on keeping on Skippy *Glitches May Occur. Consume(D) At Own Risk |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80609517 United States 10/03/2022 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: DeploraVision ™ The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended). I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you. Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life: [link to thecovidblog.com (secure)] It was your article dumb ass You're pissed at me for pointing out your lack of reading comprehension on the very article you posted... And instead assume I'm not only vaxxed, but for it? I just can't stand idiots posting stuff they can't understand, that, if anything, prove Trumps Warp Speed Vaccine is just the bestest Name calling just proves your lack of intellect. I read the article, and all the links multiple times. ODDLY the government data after 3rd injection was propaganda because they were caught red-handed promoting genocide. Watch the documentary in full before you post again on this thread, and stop with the name calling. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Just because you try to come across as intelligent in your insults, does not detract from what they are. I mean, as an Aussie with difficulty in abstract concepts, ill stick with reading the articles and medical studies you posted here, that since you can't refute, are now trying to redirect to another source to "prove yourself" Keep on keeping on Skippy Third jab testimonials in the video that you have been instructed to watch before posting again. The video is 55 minutes long. You are banned from this thread for one hour while you watch it. I won't be resorting to smarmy name calling, so take your time out to reflect on your behaviour moving forward. If pointing out your inability to absorb abstract thought saved just one life of someone on the fence about getting the death jabs; I'm glad I fertilized your brian. Last Edited by DeploraVision ™ on 10/03/2022 12:51 PM Comments have been disabled. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81235529 United States 10/03/2022 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The vaxzeenated think they are now immune and invincible. Little do they realize the vaxzeen simply does not work. The vaxzeen is not meant to protect you from any virus. It's intended to shorten your lifespan, and through various means. Blood clots is one common means. Another are the metals in those vaxzeens. When the war starts, and the EMPs explode, your brain is going to light up like a 4th of July sparkler. And down you all go. BTW, I'm not going to help with the cleanup work afterwards. Screw that idea. A most, I might be willing to drive one of the garbage trucks. But only if the corpses are airtight within their body bags. |
DeploraVision ™
(OP) User ID: 84283058 United States 10/03/2022 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The vaxzeenated think they are now immune and invincible. Little do they realize the vaxzeen simply does not work. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81235529 The vaxzeen is not meant to protect you from any virus. It's intended to shorten your lifespan, and through various means. Blood clots is one common means. Another are the metals in those vaxzeens. When the war starts, and the EMPs explode, your brain is going to light up like a 4th of July sparkler. And down you all go. BTW, I'm not going to help with the cleanup work afterwards. Screw that idea. A most, I might be willing to drive one of the garbage trucks. But only if the corpses are airtight within their body bags. https://imgur.com/a/qfgcqVO [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Comments have been disabled. |
Let Freedom Ring 365
User ID: 79605074 United States 10/03/2022 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are the creator of your own master plan... Make it a good one. Wake the fuk up and be ready... This is absolutely no time to be stupid! “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” - Nikola Tesla |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84311025 10/03/2022 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84309588 United Kingdom 10/03/2022 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oxford University researchers found that those who had taken the anti-COVID shots stood at substantially higher risk of infection with the coronavirus compared to those who had did not receive any COVID jab. Quoting: DeploraVision ™ Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44 percent more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission. The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8, 2020, to November 17, 2021, meaning it spanned the alpha and delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex, and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded. The results for effectiveness against positive COVID test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown (at link) below. MORE [link to www.lifesitenews.com (secure)] :safeandeffective: Wakey wakey coxid never was......ONLY VAXED DYING |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84311025 10/03/2022 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oxford University researchers found that those who had taken the anti-COVID shots stood at substantially higher risk of infection with the coronavirus compared to those who had did not receive any COVID jab. Quoting: DeploraVision ™ Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44 percent more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission. The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8, 2020, to November 17, 2021, meaning it spanned the alpha and delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex, and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded. The results for effectiveness against positive COVID test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown (at link) below. MORE [link to www.lifesitenews.com (secure)] :safeandeffective: Wakey wakey coxid never was......ONLY VAXED DYING You're right. Millions died from the vents, that remdisveer shit, and denying ivermectin in early stages. Engineered genocide, with a dead patient bounty to hospitals of $100k each to kill them. |
Katipo
User ID: 84062383 New Zealand 10/03/2022 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |