Was Nixon setup as cover for Demonrat crimes the same way Russiagate was meant to take down Trump and provide cover for Hillary?

Not actually.

The Founders gave pardon power to the President because they KNEW judges and prosecutors could be corrupted and unjustly target and destroy people because that's what King George was doing to the Colonists. They made sure the President could undo their corruption and wickedness.

Russian Collusion is in fact a hoax. It was a hoax along the Clinton Camp cooked it up and the corrupt media went along with it.

There is another crime called SEDITION which is what they are guilty of. When you conspire to subvert and undermine legitimate authority that is Sedition.

Insults will get you everywhere. Do you wear leather?

:bugs bunny:

Not actually.

The Founders gave pardon power to the President because they KNEW judges and prosecutors could be corrupted and unjustly target and destroy people because that's what King George was doing to the Colonists. They made sure the President could undo their corruption and wickedness. The ancillary unrelated crimes of people connected to Trump are irrelevant to the core accusation.

Russian Collusion is in fact a hoax. It was a hoax along the Clinton Camp cooked it up and the corrupt media went along with it.

There is another crime called SEDITION which is what they are guilty of. When you conspire to subvert and undermine legitimate authority that is Sedition.

Seeing how all this shit went down with Trump and the Russia Russia Russia lies that the MSM pumped out 24/7 for years makes me question what really happened to Nixon. Woodward and Bernstein revealed themselves to be lying dirtbags with all the Russiagate lies. Why should we assume they were telling the whole truth about Watergate? It seems plausible that it was all a cover for Demonrat crimes and Nixon took the fall because he wasn't a fighter like Trump.





Watergate is usually considered shorthand for a story about five burglars at the offices of the Democratic National Committee, caught in the midst of a covert operation to impact the outcome of the 1972 presidential election. Yet the reality of the case is something vastly larger than history’s shorthand: a story that began long before the break-in—which occurred 50 years ago this spring—and a cover-up that extended long after the original burglary.

...

Where it gets trickier is whether the burglars were playing offense or defense in their operation. Were they trying to uncover dirt on the Democrats or find out what dirt the Democrats had amassed on Nixon and his team? While there’s no shortage of intel the burglars may have hoped to uncover, speculation in the years since has generally focused on three separate theories—one about financial improprieties and the upcoming Democratic convention in Miami, another on sexual blackmail, and a third about illegal foreign campaign donations.

The most straightforward “hidden dirt” theory is that the burglars were ultimately looking for both financial improprieties as well as trying to uncover any nefarious plans the Democrats might have had to disrupt the Republican convention, possibly mirroring plots that the Nixon campaign operation, CREEP (the Committee to Re-elect the President) had been gaming out.

...

So, what might the burglars have been digging for? Some theorized that the break-in was tied to a high-priced D.C. escort service that figured luridly in contemporaneous news reports. Under this theory, officials visiting the Democratic National Committee headquarters, who would want to arrange hookups with escorts, could go into an out-of-the-way office, view a selection of photos kept under lock and key, and then arrange liaisons by phone. Were the burglars trying to gather this type of evidence?

A third theory about the secrets hidden inside the DNC centers around illegal foreign campaign finances. According to later questioning, the Cuban-born burglars, some of whom spoke little English and seemed genuinely befuddled by the purpose of the whole mission, believed they had been recruited to uncover the Democratic Party’s links to Fidel Castro, but the evidence that has since emerged shifted instead toward shadowy contributions to Nixon’s own campaign.

[link to www.vanityfair.com (secure)]

Not actually.

The Founders gave pardon power to the President because they KNEW judges and prosecutors could be corrupted and unjustly target and destroy people because that's what King George was doing to the Colonists. They made sure the President could undo their corruption and wickedness. The ancillary unrelated crimes of people connected to Trump are irrelevant to the core accusation.

Russian Collusion is in fact a hoax. It was a hoax along the Clinton Camp cooked it up and the corrupt media went along with it.

There is another crime called SEDITION which is what they are guilty of. When you conspire to subvert and undermine legitimate authority that is Sedition.

No, Nixon was a lying, weasel piece of shit, just like Clinton and Obama. His problem was, he was a republican, and not a democrat, so he took the weight.

Actually no one went to prison from Trumps administration, that stayed there.

Seeing how all this shit went down with Trump and the Russia Russia Russia lies that the MSM pumped out 24/7 for years makes me question what really happened to Nixon. Woodward and Bernstein revealed themselves to be lying dirtbags with all the Russiagate lies. Why should we assume they were telling the whole truth about Watergate? It seems plausible that it was all a cover for Demonrat crimes and Nixon took the fall because he wasn't a fighter like Trump.





Watergate is usually considered shorthand for a story about five burglars at the offices of the Democratic National Committee, caught in the midst of a covert operation to impact the outcome of the 1972 presidential election. Yet the reality of the case is something vastly larger than history’s shorthand: a story that began long before the break-in—which occurred 50 years ago this spring—and a cover-up that extended long after the original burglary.

...

Where it gets trickier is whether the burglars were playing offense or defense in their operation. Were they trying to uncover dirt on the Democrats or find out what dirt the Democrats had amassed on Nixon and his team? While there’s no shortage of intel the burglars may have hoped to uncover, speculation in the years since has generally focused on three separate theories—one about financial improprieties and the upcoming Democratic convention in Miami, another on sexual blackmail, and a third about illegal foreign campaign donations.

The most straightforward “hidden dirt” theory is that the burglars were ultimately looking for both financial improprieties as well as trying to uncover any nefarious plans the Democrats might have had to disrupt the Republican convention, possibly mirroring plots that the Nixon campaign operation, CREEP (the Committee to Re-elect the President) had been gaming out.

...

So, what might the burglars have been digging for? Some theorized that the break-in was tied to a high-priced D.C. escort service that figured luridly in contemporaneous news reports. Under this theory, officials visiting the Democratic National Committee headquarters, who would want to arrange hookups with escorts, could go into an out-of-the-way office, view a selection of photos kept under lock and key, and then arrange liaisons by phone. Were the burglars trying to gather this type of evidence?

A third theory about the secrets hidden inside the DNC centers around illegal foreign campaign finances. According to later questioning, the Cuban-born burglars, some of whom spoke little English and seemed genuinely befuddled by the purpose of the whole mission, believed they had been recruited to uncover the Democratic Party’s links to Fidel Castro, but the evidence that has since emerged shifted instead toward shadowy contributions to Nixon’s own campaign.

[link to www.vanityfair.com (secure)]

No, Nixon was a lying, weasel piece of shit, just like Clinton and Obama. His problem was, he was a republican, and not a democrat, so he took the weight.

Nixon ended the war that Kennedy and Johnson started.
MIC was very angry at that highly principled man.

Seeing how all this shit went down with Trump and the Russia Russia Russia lies that the MSM pumped out 24/7 for years makes me question what really happened to Nixon. Woodward and Bernstein revealed themselves to be lying dirtbags with all the Russiagate lies. Why should we assume they were telling the whole truth about Watergate? It seems plausible that it was all a cover for Demonrat crimes and Nixon took the fall because he wasn't a fighter like Trump.





Watergate is usually considered shorthand for a story about five burglars at the offices of the Democratic National Committee, caught in the midst of a covert operation to impact the outcome of the 1972 presidential election. Yet the reality of the case is something vastly larger than history’s shorthand: a story that began long before the break-in—which occurred 50 years ago this spring—and a cover-up that extended long after the original burglary.

...

Where it gets trickier is whether the burglars were playing offense or defense in their operation. Were they trying to uncover dirt on the Democrats or find out what dirt the Democrats had amassed on Nixon and his team? While there’s no shortage of intel the burglars may have hoped to uncover, speculation in the years since has generally focused on three separate theories—one about financial improprieties and the upcoming Democratic convention in Miami, another on sexual blackmail, and a third about illegal foreign campaign donations.

The most straightforward “hidden dirt” theory is that the burglars were ultimately looking for both financial improprieties as well as trying to uncover any nefarious plans the Democrats might have had to disrupt the Republican convention, possibly mirroring plots that the Nixon campaign operation, CREEP (the Committee to Re-elect the President) had been gaming out.

...

So, what might the burglars have been digging for? Some theorized that the break-in was tied to a high-priced D.C. escort service that figured luridly in contemporaneous news reports. Under this theory, officials visiting the Democratic National Committee headquarters, who would want to arrange hookups with escorts, could go into an out-of-the-way office, view a selection of photos kept under lock and key, and then arrange liaisons by phone. Were the burglars trying to gather this type of evidence?

A third theory about the secrets hidden inside the DNC centers around illegal foreign campaign finances. According to later questioning, the Cuban-born burglars, some of whom spoke little English and seemed genuinely befuddled by the purpose of the whole mission, believed they had been recruited to uncover the Democratic Party’s links to Fidel Castro, but the evidence that has since emerged shifted instead toward shadowy contributions to Nixon’s own campaign.

[link to www.vanityfair.com (secure)]