CITIZENSHIP 1928: How Democracy killed the War Department Training Manual, TM 2000-25

US has already been duped by order 66. Why you think the Eastern world calls the US the Western Empire?

We are an autocracy ruled ny color of law.Basically admiralty law of law of the sea treaty.

think this is pertinent to the times we're in

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

https://imgur.com/a/1ZiK3LN

CITIZENSHIP 1928: How Democracy killed the War Department Training Manual, TM 2000-25


why was Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 withdrawn by FDR?
issued by the United States War Department on November 30, 1928, The Soldiers Training Manual offered instruction on the topic of Citizenship. Its intent was to prepare soldiers that they "may be returned to civilian life better equipped as the defenders of the institutions of our Government in time of peace as well as in time of war."

a primary purpose of the manual was to impart knowledge of our republican form of government, and an understanding of the many ways it is superior to a democracy. The following definitions were published by the authority of the United States Government to differentiate between our Republic and a democracy.

republic

Authority is derived through election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles, and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.

democracy

aA government of the masses. authority is derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating property rights. attitude toward law is that the will of the people shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation, or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagoguery, license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy.

for reasons unknown, at the onset of the Great Depression Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued orders that all copies of Training Manual 2000-25 be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office and the Army posts, and that they be suppressed and destroyed without explanation. While this indeed occurred, several copies survived in private ownership and still change hands today.

Can anyone explain the utility of eliminating this specific citizenship training from our military?

What would the new Democrat administration have gained from this?


Army Training Manual No. 2000-25
[link to www.1215.org (secure)]

the definitions quoted in the OP are taken from pages 91 and 92 of the manual linked to above.

one problem FDR may have had with the manual, from p. 91:
"the United States set up a distinct and different form of government, the product of distinct racial stocks and centuries spent in learning the principles and art of self government." according to manual, only some people could live in a republic. theres a similar statement in the previous paragraph: "a few races qualified themselves for self government."

one thing i noticed about these definitions:they claim to describe all political systems, but they don't really describe fascism. i can understand why in 1928 no one thought to describe fascism, but by 1933 a description of fascism was becoming necessary. i also didn't think the association of democracy with communism wasn't all that useful. communism can be discussed, but call it communism, not democracy.

think this is pertinent to the times we're in

[link to imgur.com (secure)]
[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]


CITIZENSHIP 1928: How Democracy killed the War Department Training Manual, TM 2000-25


why was Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 withdrawn by FDR?
issued by the United States War Department on November 30, 1928, The Soldiers Training Manual offered instruction on the topic of Citizenship. Its intent was to prepare soldiers that they "may be returned to civilian life better equipped as the defenders of the institutions of our Government in time of peace as well as in time of war."

a primary purpose of the manual was to impart knowledge of our republican form of government, and an understanding of the many ways it is superior to a democracy. The following definitions were published by the authority of the United States Government to differentiate between our Republic and a democracy.

republic

Authority is derived through election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles, and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.

democracy

aA government of the masses. authority is derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating property rights. attitude toward law is that the will of the people shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation, or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagoguery, license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy.

for reasons unknown, at the onset of the Great Depression Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued orders that all copies of Training Manual 2000-25 be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office and the Army posts, and that they be suppressed and destroyed without explanation. While this indeed occurred, several copies survived in private ownership and still change hands today.

Can anyone explain the utility of eliminating this specific citizenship training from our military?

What would the new Democrat administration have gained from this?


Army Training Manual No. 2000-25
[link to www.1215.org (secure)]

the definitions quoted in the OP are taken from pages 91 and 92 of the manual linked to above.

one problem FDR may have had with the manual, from p. 91:
"the United States set up a distinct and different form of government, the product of distinct racial stocks and centuries spent in learning the principles and art of self government." according to manual, only some people could live in a republic. theres a similar statement in the previous paragraph: "a few races qualified themselves for self government."

one thing i noticed about these definitions:they claim to describe all political systems, but they don't really describe fascism. i can understand why in 1928 no one thought to describe fascism, but by 1933 a description of fascism was becoming necessary. i also didn't think the association of democracy with communism wasn't all that useful. communism can be discussed, but call it communism, not democracy.

think this is pertinent to the times we're in

[link to imgur.com (secure)]
[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]


CITIZENSHIP 1928: How Democracy killed the War Department Training Manual, TM 2000-25


why was Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 withdrawn by FDR?
issued by the United States War Department on November 30, 1928, The Soldiers Training Manual offered instruction on the topic of Citizenship. Its intent was to prepare soldiers that they "may be returned to civilian life better equipped as the defenders of the institutions of our Government in time of peace as well as in time of war."

a primary purpose of the manual was to impart knowledge of our republican form of government, and an understanding of the many ways it is superior to a democracy. The following definitions were published by the authority of the United States Government to differentiate between our Republic and a democracy.

republic

Authority is derived through election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles, and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.

democracy

aA government of the masses. authority is derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating property rights. attitude toward law is that the will of the people shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation, or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagoguery, license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy.

for reasons unknown, at the onset of the Great Depression Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued orders that all copies of Training Manual 2000-25 be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office and the Army posts, and that they be suppressed and destroyed without explanation. While this indeed occurred, several copies survived in private ownership and still change hands today.

Can anyone explain the utility of eliminating this specific citizenship training from our military?

What would the new Democrat administration have gained from this?


Army Training Manual No. 2000-25
[link to www.1215.org (secure)]

the definitions quoted in the OP are taken from pages 91 and 92 of the manual linked to above.

one problem FDR may have had with the manual, from p. 91:
"the United States set up a distinct and different form of government, the product of distinct racial stocks and centuries spent in learning the principles and art of self government." according to manual, only some people could live in a republic. theres a similar statement in the previous paragraph: "a few races qualified themselves for self government."

one thing i noticed about these definitions:they claim to describe all political systems, but they don't really describe fascism. i can understand why in 1928 no one thought to describe fascism, but by 1933 a description of fascism was becoming necessary. i also didn't think the association of democracy with communism wasn't all that useful. communism can be discussed, but call it communism, not democracy.

A must see:

You may understand why they tried to kill FDR; he was trying to become the dictator of the country. He died before he got that far, they missed when they shot at him and hit someone else. He was into all the groups trying to bring our country down, these are usurpers, they are not our government. He wasn't by himself, there were many, and don't forget he was the one who passed the law with the other democrats to make the owning of gold illegal and stole the gold wages of the people which is real and the fiat isn't, people knew it was against the constitution and also, they knew the draft to fight in WW1 was against the constitution, but they arrested people who they could not talk out of not going. They brought in the banking and Rockefeller was involved and his NWO was part of the plot.

We are still by the constitution a Republic but they have taught people we are a democracy so they don't know to fight back.

Pages 12 and 13
#25 - No Dual Allegiance
Any man that says he's an America, but something else also, isn't an American at all.

A must see:

US has already been duped by order 66. Why you think the Eastern world calls the US the Western Empire?

its time to get back where we once belong

we're a republic NOT a democracy

Banking Empire is what it really is, this happened to a small group of people, all over the world, they pick the US dollar as the global currency and they made us the police of the world which kill our sons and now daughters. Yes, it was to destroy our republic but they are just Washington usurpers and thieves, they are the state department who takes orders from the group that calls themselves the CFR which I found out was really the world congress who were told around the late 1800s or very early 1900s they were to dismantle their congress and get it off our shores, so they open in DC and change themselves to the Cancel of Foreign Relations which is the UN arm, got it, this is against our country and we are not beholden to the UN in any way, everyone in the UN members is criminals of their countries. All you have to do is go watch movies before and after WW2, then and only then will you realize what has happened to the world with them pushing these wars it was a takeover, this is the real ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT and it has been doing more and more to put the people of this world into chains.

These are nasty sick vile evil people involved in this, the bankers are behind the military-industrial complex, who else has the money to do this? They have stolen people's real wages, and labor and treated the American people as slaves, since their start of this. The top Freemasons by the time this started had already become worshipers of lucifer or Satan. They have links to all these wars and the banking system they OKed when Wilson went to ask his supreme leader in the Freemason Temple in DC, if it was the thing to do, of course, he told him to do it. Wilson before he died said it was the worst mistake he ever made, well yes, they knew his weaknesses.

During the early 1920s, they hired graduate students to rewrite the history of the US. You know the ones who needed money to pay for their education did this, others refused, and their books these people who would not do it had their books attacked.
Then they started in the heavier and more prominent cities to change the way schools taught. They also went after the culture of the time due to teaching children to call their parents by their given name instead of mother and father or mom and dad. DEWEY did this, as he said, give me the children for 10 years and they will do and act as I tell them. All this was the being, it didn't reach the countryside or poor states but it did in the coastal cities where a large number of populations lived. The dummying down of the American population was in high gear. So, this is to say they are still using the government school system, DO NOT ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN TO LEARN FROM THE STATE!