There's no FLAT EARTH. One fact to destroy it completely.

Again, just saying that doesn't make it true.
Go play with your dolls...

You have gave a great explanation but the flat earthtards are crazy. We are being fed unimportant information for a reason. And the uneducated are Crazy enough to believe it. When a flat space pancakes with their 8th grade education insist everyone has to except there illogical theory, you really know they are CRAZY!

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Exactly right! You have deflected the obvious! You have been dismissed!

The amount of energy needed to refute stupidity is much greater than the amount needed to produce.

DISMISSED!

This is a stupid argument.

Of course the earth is flat.


We live on a plane.


And buy real estate

One of the things I like most about flat earth tards is that they aren’t concerned about being the dumbest person in the room. They have concerned about being dumber than they were yesterday.

Trust the science people, you know, that same science that says you evolved from apes. Same science that says a big bang just happened on its own and all creations just perfectly developed from it. Same science that can't determine male from female now. Same science that says take the kill shot. Yea, trust the science

So, why don't you explain the correct science?
Show the undisputable truth about flat earth?
And if you can do that, then please start with the undisputable fact in the OP.
Thanks in advance...

Lying eyes...

[link to www.zmescience.com (secure)]

Op, you should post this on the "The lakes prove the earth is flat" thread.

Again, you're mentally ill seek help kid

Exactly right! You have deflected the obvious! You have been dismissed!

The amount of energy needed to refute stupidity is much greater than the amount needed to produce.

DISMISSED!

This has got to be the DUMBEST statement ever.

Oh shut up you tiresome person, dismissed, we are not at school, it's a conspiracy forum now fuck off.

My favorite way to disprove flat earth is to ask the pancake-tards to provide a copy of a MAP of flat earth drawn to scale. If the Earth is flat, a perfectly proportional, non-distorted map should be easily capable of being produced.

Only problem is, no one can draw a flat map of the earth to scale, because the Earth’s topography is superimposed over a sphere, not a flat surface. Ever see one of those world maps where Greenland and Antarctica are gigantic beyond their true size? That’s because in order to portray all the other continents more or less accurately, the poles have to be distorted considerably.

I even created my own thread on this exact topic a few months back and all the little flat-tards went REEEEEE at my simple request to provide me a non-distorted, accurately drawn to scale 2d map of our supposedly 2d Earth.

Well done OP. I think flat earth is just a psyop by world powers to test how gullible and suggestible people really are, and to create propaganda campaigns on the basis of how easy it was to deceive people despite all facts and evidence saying the contrary.

Flat earth tard's don't even have a reliable map, nor an 8th grade education yet you want to lecture us on your make believe science.

Got it!!!

DISMISSED!

Thanks, it's like talking to 4 year olds that are in need of special education.

I've been in search of an "Official" flat earth map but could not find one.
They also always say don't trust the science yet never show their "science" as to back up their claims.

You (and no one else) can draw an accurate, non-distorted and drawn to scale 2d map of your supposed 2d earth.

You can’t even depict what your own 2d flatland looks like on a corresponding 2D map, which should be all the evidence you need.

The reason being that you can’t accurately portray on a flat surface all distances between all points when the 2d map you’re trying to create is based on a surface that exists in 3d dimensions, I.e, is superimposed over a sphere.

Cartographers have created a variety of flat maps, all of which they acknowledge contain some degree of distortion, most typically near the polar regions (think of Greenland and Antarctica being portrayed as much more gigantic than they actually are on flat maps).

I recently had a mental dilemma where i couldnt understand why it was winter in Australia and summer in America, so before your brain signals you to red flag me, consider this, if at Christmas time its said to be the winter solstace the point that the earth is farthest from the sun, then how is it summertime in Australia if the whole earth is farthest away from the sun, then its reversed for the summer solstace where we are supposed to be closest to the sun, thats considered winter in Australia so dont try to say its the tilt of the earth because that doesnt explain so much distance.

Your basing this on a man made clock. Does the sun stay in the sky longer in the summer? Does the sun stay in the sky less in the winter? Slower and faster is proven by the seasons.

Op is also using a video that portrays a theory of ball earth growing. A flat earth could also spread the land masses apart.

Keep searching.

Right. Their beliefs aren’t based on science, reason, falsifiable experimentation, observation, or anything of the sort. They are deeply suspicious of the world and authorities around them, in many cases bordering on paranoid. But their paranoia/distrust is very, very misplaced in this instance.

You have it backwards. In January it's 91.4 and July it's 94.5 million miles. That's a 1% change. The tilt is 22 out of possible 90 which is a 24% change.

but according to you we should uce walls in yhe horizon? hoc come they arent thwre?

The explanation is simple: flat-earthers have faulty memories.

The Earth’s tilt on its axis perfectly explains seasonal variation. When sunlight is more stretched out over a surface (winter), its intensity decreases proportionally. Hence, why the region of Earth receiving less direct sunlight becomes colder than the part of the Earth getting directly blasted by sunlight.

The fact that the Earth has an “elliptical” orbit (the word I think you’re looking for) has a negligible impact on surface temperatures, if any effect at all. The Earth’s atmosphere is still getting hit by the sun, and a few miles of variation doesn’t add up to any real significant temperature difference. Before Venus had a runaway greenhouse effect, it likely looked similar to Earth and relatively similar temperatures despite being considerably closer to the sun.

Simply not true. Here is how globe earth is invalid: To rotate 25000 miles in one solar day, the earth would have to spin at 1000 mph. A tornado destroys everything in its path at 300 mph. If the earth rotates, to travel from west to east, why not elevate a helicopter over the ground and let the destination come to it?
Answers? Earth is flat not round.

Lol the sun isn’t moving across the sky any slower or faster. It’s taking a different route across the sky, which means it can either take longer to set after rising or take a shorter amount of time. Go to the polar regions, and you can see phenomenon such as the midnight sun, where the sun will just appear to be spinning endlessly in a circle just above the horizon. That phenomenon can only occur on a spherical Earth.

Because the helicopter is still following the momentum of the Earth.

If you jump up in a flatbed truck traveling 50 mph, do you immediately revert back to going 0 mph and land on the pavement as the truck continues forward? Of course not, because your momentum is conserved. Same exact principle in action. Everything on Earth is keeping momentum with its inertial frame of reference, the Earth. Which is always spinning.

He only sees the moon during the day and never during the night?

Case closed, Sherlock.