Mainly for newbies: 40-minute Moon landing hoax video

Classic, here's one on Roswell...

All dubunked shite and stuff the to brainless to understand!

I wish I could find that great compilation vid of all of the astronauts on wires inside the supposed "ISS" and underwater when claiming to be in space. It totally exposed what frauds they are. It was set to a great tune as well.

Yes, it's a classic. Sibrel HATES the flat Earth movement, though. Strange guy. You'd think he would make more documentaries. Does he drive a taxi now? He assaulted another driver. He's also very churchy now. But that documentary is pure gold.

.


that dude genuinly things he can prove shit to peopel becasue formual works...


it is all based on lies, I don't think he intentionally lies.
He is convinced he can see webb telescope from his living room through 20k telescope.

Like many belive are influencers on instagram, becasue they took photo of morning late.



.

.



Russia is fighting nationalism, they are killing the last few people that have balls and brain and are against goverments, and no it is not Zelensky , he is the one that does the killing of the independent batalions. They are more conservative than most of us ever will be.




.

.


you must be the third astronout....



.

Thanks for posting the video.

This is actually only the 2nd time I have watched one of these. I contest several things in the film, but a lot of it I agree wtih.

Here's my take on it.
I agree that there is no way in hell that the LEM landed on the moon or that an ascent stage lifted back off with people aboard.
I watched the landings as a kid. I didn't even have the simplest calculator until around 1974ish. Any sort of computer back then was the size of a large refrigerator.

For a 3 day excursion on the moon, for a couple guys, they would have needed a shitload of O2 to breath. I guess NASA would claim they had liquid O2 for the engine and that some of this was also used to breathe. And the waste CO2 would need to be scrubbed from the air. Even asssuming they were doing all all that, it just doesn't seem possible on such a tiny craft.

I visited the Johnson Space Center around 1990 and they had an extra Saturn 5 rocket laying in the front yard of the place and inside I stood right next to the LEM. Gold crinkly aluminum foil and tiny. at the time, I thought the foil was just to reflect solar radiation to prevent overheating. But it was so tiny it looked absurd.

The ascent stage video looks absurd. WHile a Hydrogen flame is nearly invisible, you still should see SOME blue light from the thing. Other than an initial puff, you see no evidence of a rocket thruster in operation on the film.
Giving the benefit of the doubt that in the garish and very intense light of the Sun which has not been attenuated by an atmosphere, I can see how a dim H2 flame might appear as invisible on film.

But what I think is clearly impossible is the straight up ascent of a stubby craft with no giant stabilization gyroscope spinning, and just a simple thruster which I can't believe was making all of the sophisticated thousand thrust vecotr corrections a minute that you can see Musk's rocket engines doing.

The video made some absurd light intensity calculation for the moon, based on the inverse square law which is clearly wrong. Given the large distance of the Earth and Moon from the Sun, the little distance between Earth and the Moon is almost irrelevant when calculating Sun intensity. The important variable is the lack of an attentuating atmosphere on the Moon.

I agree that the number of photos is absurd. And if they had manual cameras, the pictures would be shit, because the guy has (or should have) almost no manual dexterity inside a pressure suit inflated to 15 psi. (Crawl inside a tire and take some pictures). :) Not quite that bad, but you get the point.

The video makes some mistakes talking about the dune buggy being battery operated. It was supposed to be powered by a Hydrogen fuel cell. The holy grail of modern electric vehicles. Except it was insanely expensive back then and had a very short service life. I think it was possible to build such a vehicle and that it could drive around a bit on the Moon. I have trouble believing it was folded up and stashed on the side of that tiny craft made of aluminum foil.


I don't believe the USSR and the US were cooperating about anything. The reason the US faked the landings would have been to beat Russia obviously, and to get them to spend a fortune trying to replicate it. Much like Ronald Reagan with with his "SDI star wars initiative, which was largely credited, at least somewhat for the USSR going bust financially).

I think that most of the engineers would have thought the missions were real. Only people that NEEDED to know, would have known it was a hoax. (The astronauts themselves, and the guys designing the LEM of course would have to know that whatever aluminum foil contraption they were producing was just a prop. And the guys in the studio filming the scenes.

I do believe they built the Apollo rockets, held spectacular launches and that they put a craft in orbit around the Moon. They might have launched that LEM UNMANNED down to the Moon. Maybe. But they did not sustain human lives on the Moon for 3 days, take off again with a bag of fucking rocks and 8 million rolls of film, and 3 days worth of bowel movements in a Hefty bag, on a vehicle the size of a VW bus. Nope.

(Would they not leave a giant bag of shit and piss on the Moon? Do they ever mention what happened to their excrement?


With regard to temperature extremes, at the time, they explained the landing site was chosed right on the Day/night line to encounter the mildest temperature extremes possible.
In a short stay on the Moon, the Day/Night line on the Moon would not vary by much. It doesn't spin like the Earth does.
Lunar day is 29.5 Earth day. ALthought at 3 days, there would be some significant movement of the Day/night line.


A person at rest breathes 11,000 liters of air a day.
3 days on the Moon, X 2 astronauts X 11,000 liters. = 66,000 liters of air.
at 1.3 grams per liter = 86 kg of air. OK, maybe possible if liquified O2 (20 kg or so?) is used to replenish the atmospheric O2 concentration, CO2 is scubbed and whatever inert gas, like N2 is simply recirculated.

Edit: correction, the ascent stage engine used Aerozine 50 fuel, and N2O4 oxidizer. Not a H2 O2 engine.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

It was a fixed engine. No thrust vectoring.
SO they had little reaction side thrusters that supposedly stabilized the craft.

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 07/28/2022 07:05 AM

So we did NASA fake it all? Van Allen radiation belts? Or the FIRMAMENT?



Watch in fullscreen:
[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

In any other situation, NASA would have been shut down by now. All they do is launch communication balloons (no such thing as communication "satellites" in "outer space") and make pizza on he ISS in monkey suits and show you the nozzle the shit into.

But people get paid huge amounts of money, they aren't going to unemploy themselves. There's the deceptions and there's the money. I couldn't do that - make millions from being a liar, it would eat me up as I spoke about my job to my family, making them think I'm a hotshot when all I do is dupe humanity. It ate Neil Armstrong up, that's why he was a recluse and Aldrin became an alcoholic.

The whole story of NASA just has a bad feeling more than anything. You can get scientific in the debunking, but overall, it's the, "these boys is LYIN, y'all" country bumpkin wisdom that I'm left with. If it was all REAL, the feeling would there. Well, we'd have had 1000 journeys to the Moon by now, it would be normal to know someone who had been in outer space, but how many people have been in space - I mean far out into the void, ie. far enough to look back on the Earth as a globe? Not many.

135-minute documentary on the Earth and Firmament...




Enjoy life!

As a newbie, I endorse this video!

I am unsure of the gents whereabouts these days, I was unaware he had commented on globe denials and he's probably more frustrated that his wonderful documentary has been hijacked by people with agendas different to his own.
The documentary is a classic and has never been debunked it deserves far more recognition.

It's just weird that a guy who is a devout Christian who helped destroy NASA's credibility is vehemently flat Earth. Flat Earth backs up his worldview, but he still clings to the globe. He'll come around. ALL globers will come around, there no other path to go down.

To watch later...

5 famous moon conspiracies debunked

Well...

Simply look at the COVID hoax.

MORAN

More evidence that moon landing was real.

Who is going to be the Moran? When it gets proved that moon landing was real?

Explain this, moon hoaxers.

We'd go back to the uh moon in a nanosecond but we uh don't have that technology anymore.

60 fucking years fool, prove it how??

We'd go back to the uh moon in a nanosecond but we uh don't have that technology anymore.

60 fucking years fool, prove it how??

:ohlook:

This has become the dumbest excuse. You have watched the past two years that there is a Global Empire that plays hand in hand behind the scenes.

Did you ever think Russia and China were faking their own advancements and got usurped by the US?

All of these things are compartmentalized. Try working in the Government. The left hand has no idea what the right hand is doing.

This is tired.

I believe he said we have have to do the hard work again.

So i think it's not that easy today with everything costing a lot more, and we are now over $20 trillion in debt.

The Moon landing MAY have been faked, but the space and satellites above our heads as well as robotic space probes (some of them) are quite real.

Try to use your brain.

Never believe anything a stupid polock tells you. Obviously. Surprised you would even bring him up. Ridiculous!

Hey Dick Smack, assuming that what you say is even true, you cannot blame the public for being skeptical of something that has not been duplicated in over half a century despite our advancing technology. You also can't expect the public to believe its a lack of money issue because the gooberment spends a lot more on things that give back nothing. Like trillion dollar plus covid stimulus packages. Multiple trillion dollar plus covid stimulus packages. You could do thousands of moon mission with all that money based on current estimates. So don't tell us it was because of a lack of funding that we have not went back. Tons of companies would pay to be able to get to the moon, if they could. So why would the gooberment not just let corporate America take over the moon trips and profit from it then??? Why have they not went back?

Lots of questions that you can't answer.

So don't go blaming the public and calling them stupid. They have a right to be asking A LOT of questions about the Apollo program.