Why are the vaxxed so angry?

I am still being actively discriminated against for my CHOICE of bodily autonomy... in the REAL WORLD, you clowns.

I still can't enter many of my clients (big corporate's) buildings because of vaccination requirements.

Many events (both social and career related) are still requiring vaccination, putting me at a disadvantage to my vaccinated counterparts.

Just today our "Health" Minster said that 3 doses is the requirement now, no longer just two doses.

... and so many other examples, I could fill a book.

Only the vaccinated, when dealing with other vaccinated, and ignoring the active and continuing discrimination of the unvaccinated, pretend that "nobody is talking about it" anymore... right up until they don't let yo in the door, and you can tell it is still very much front and centre in EVERY vaccinated mind.

Pure vaccinated echo chamber.

You are being so very disingenuous.

No vaccine requirements in my state and visitors to Australia no longer need to be vaccinated

Where’s the link where “our Health Minster said that 3 doses is the requirement now, no longer just two doses.”

They’ve been “recommending” a booster to everyone eligible and a second booster for immunocompromised and those over 65

After your behavior; believe me, don't believe, whatever... go find the link yourself if you're actually interested or genuine.

I guess you don't have to go into corporate buildings as an unvaccinated person then.

My local council is still coercing people to be double vaccinated (probably triple vaxxed as of today) for citizenship ceremonies, and other group events. Many councils are, despite the propaganda that "it's all over".

They crumble when you challenge them on it, but if they can get away with discrimination against the unvaccinatd currently, they will.

It is blatant, and everywhere, and even your attitude in this thread supports the mentality.

Are you trying to say that I am lying about my experiences of continued discrimination?

The discrimination is there and palpable (legislation was changed that wasn't debated, and hasn't been changed back, or even acknowledged really).

You're blind or deliberately obtuse if you are saying you don't see it.

There were actually a few papers in the microbiology area that suggested mRNA could permanently alter DNA before te pandemic.

I found one from 2013 and another from 2017, and they both had a fair amount of related references that could have been followed up further.

As I said, they were tangentially related (one was making permanent changes in fungi, another was in an insect from memory).

The point is though, that we did know that mRNA could potentially alter DNA.

Saying we didn't is quite simply academic dishonesty, or you are not across the literature as much as you think.

What's more, you refer to "living normal people" as people who aren't HIV positive, though there are studies that both suggest there are HIV inserts in the COVID (so everyone that has had COVID could be potentially HIV positive) and that suffers of both COVID and the vaccines have tested positive for HIV.

Also, an Australian vaccine development program at Queensland University was shut down in 2020 because subjects were testing positive for HIV... hmmm

So it's not a far stretch to see how this mRNA vaccine could be altering the DNA of the vaccinated.

I’ve watched the video and nowhere does she say “3 shots are required”… unless you have another version

Yes it is a very far stretch. Altering DNA like those other papers you mention was about the structure of the DNA, not the information it contained (genes). Now if a structural “fold” or something cut off access to a needed gene, the cell will just die. To actually permanently alter someone’s DNA, you have to add, subtract or scramble the information it contains.

If COVID had the HIV gene for reverse transcriptase then it would have been all over the news and you would have seen infected people killed. It’s nonsense.

"Two weeks to flatten the curve" hey?... c'mon man! Are you for real?

Why so deliberately obtuse?

Why do you keep giving these people the benefit of the doubt?

She says clearly, "... disregard everything we've said about two doses (cackle), it's now 3 doses or more..." she goes on to say they are monitoring the "changing evidence" and that it will likely be updated further in the future.

What more do you want? Another lockdown and 3 dose mandates?

Exactly the same formula they've been using for two years.

Same things was being said (that they won't be mandated) about two shots, and here we are.

Why the continued denial of a clearly changing narrative and questionable intent related to these "vaccines"?

Why so obtuse, you ask
Maybe cos every single thing you’ve said is bullshit
You’ve lied about everything you’ve said
3 doses are recommended, not required, ya disingenuous cunt

Respectfully, you are disconnected from the actual world we live in.

6 Corporations control 90% of media and scientific publications.
[link to www.gaia.com (secure)]

Every one of them shares at least one board member with a drug company.
[link to trofire.com (secure)]

The largest Institutional shareholders of all 6 of them are BlackRock and Vanguard, the largest Institutional shareholder of Vanguard is BlackRock.
[link to www.sgtreport.com (secure)]

BlackRock effectively took over the US Treasury and Federal Reserve.
[link to www.sgtreport.com (secure)]

36 of 37 studies that were favorable to drugs made publication. In comparison, only 3 out of 36 studies that were not favorable to drugs made it.
[link to www.sciencealert.com (secure)]

In 2012 they repealed the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act which obliged media outlets to present both sides of any topic in an unbiased manner and prohibited the use of propaganda (now evolved into psychological warfare) against it's own citizens here in the US.
[link to foreignpolicy.com (secure)]
[link to www.rcreader.com (secure)]

There is no disunity in the message or narrative pushed upon the populace rather it be from; Fed. govt, pharmaceutical company, large corporations, media outlets, or as allowed on social media.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]