THE RIGHT QUESTION: Why did the supreme court rule on the Ny Permit issue while the Senate is passing anti gun Legislation????

you can bet if minorities get shot committing crimes it will make the news and if a white person is shot committing a crime it will not make the news.

Then the narrative becomes that white people are just shooting minorites on the street for the hell of it.

The media already rushes stories about white shooters and most here dont know 8 were injured and 1 killed on monday becuase it was a black shooter and the fact that the city had pistol laws in place didnt matter ...


when they found out the Cali Chruch shooter was asian that story died quickly..


Thread: Where’s Corporate Media? 9 Shot, College Basketball Star Left for Dead in Early Morning Harlem Shooting

you can bet if minorities get shot committing crimes it will make the news and if a white person is shot committing a crime it will not make the news.

Then the narrative becomes that white people are just shooting minorites on the street for the hell of it.

The media already rushes stories about white shooters and most here dont know 8 were injured and 1 killed on monday becuase it was a black shooter and the fact that the city had pistol laws in place didnt matter ...


when they found out the Cali Chruch shooter was asian that story died quickly..


Thread: Where’s Corporate Media? 9 Shot, College Basketball Star Left for Dead in Early Morning Harlem Shooting

Wondered myself and thought the same

CAUSE THEY KNOW WE ARE PISSED OFFF

Red flag gun laws hit the supreme court in the fall

and they are illegal

its a game of attrition, negative gain.


in survival you dont walk 5 miles and burn 1000 calories to get 50 calories....

LOSING WAY MORE THAN GAINING ON THIS !!!!!

Jeez, this decision has been in the works for years.

The real question is why push this law knowing this decision was coming.

I see the rubes still can’t or more precisely won’t see who their enemy is….

probably because in the commie gun bill there is a section where you have to write a 5,000 word essay on why you deserve the right to conceal carry

it's a shell game

keep your eye on the prize

blink and you'll miss it.

Did the Supreme Court Just Tip Its Hand For a Friday Drop of Roe v. Wade Decision?


Normally, the Supreme Court does not issue opinions on Friday. However, if you go to the official website of the Supreme Court you will notice that this upcoming Friday has now been designated as a day when opinions will be issued


This change was just made, and it has many speculating that this will be the day when the decision that overturns Roe v. Wade will finally be made official.

In Washington, announcements that are intended to fly under the radar are often made on Friday. Of course there is no way that a Supreme Court decision that overturns Roe v. Wade could fly under the radar, but officials may be hoping that timing the announcement just before the weekend will help to reduce the intensity of any immediate protests a little bit.

Personally, I don’t see that happening.

But at least the justices may have enough time to get out of town for the weekend before the streets around the Supreme Court building go absolutely bonkers.


[link to americafirstreport.com (secure)]



kinda sets the stage for FF.

I thino they are going to ease gun control and something, preplanned, will happen.

Then they will say, "See, you can't have your weapons" and all that legislation their passing will already be there.


Not hard to see.

Egggg-zackly


You understand

what owning nothing and being happy about it ...thats the only prize offered , that and death because well 8 bn population and they want 1 bn

This ruling destroys their red flag laws.

Your guns are safe.

it means to prove NY was happy following unconstitutional laws.

and thus by practice voids it.

yes well we also had a decision about rent and certain official , said well it is probably unconstitutional but im doing it anyway in defiance of the supreme court... amember that ????

It's an excellent question, esp as this case seemed to, just like the abortion case, come out of nowhere.

Setting the stage for even more govt engineered mass shootings to bring in martial law?

Nothing would surprise me.

The weekend when everyone has time on their hands to do....whatever?

Seems like the opposite to me.

Dems' only hope for Nov is to infuriate their base. Nothing does this quite so well as hot button issues like guns and abortion.

As far as this NY case goes, it has been working its way thru the courts for years, so SCOTUS had to rule on it. The big question is 'why now'?

Anything the Senate tries to pass will suffer the same fate. "Shall not be infringed".

Because the Senate is full of Putz heads that are only CONNECTED TO
THE RICH ELITE THAT PAY FOR CAMPAIGNS & give hints as
to GREAT INVESTMENTS !

I DO BELIEVE IT IS JUST WHAT NEW YORK CITY & Chicago NEED!
Why should ONLY THE FELONS BE ALLOWED TO CARRY GUNS AND USE THEM REPEATEDLY!

Famous Quote: “An armed society is a polite society !”
. . . after a year or two. ( ; )

Post # 15:


“My favorite selected excerpts From Thomas Clarence’s Opinion...

(In Heller) we looked to history because “it has always been widely understood that the Second Amendment . . . codified a pre-existing right.” The Amendment “was not intended to lay down a novel principle but rather codified a right inherited from our English ancestors.”

After surveying English history dating from the late 1600s, along with American colonial views leading up to the founding, we found “no doubt, on the basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.

We therefore turn to whether the plain text of the Second Amendment protects Koch’s and Nash’s proposed course of conduct — carrying handguns publicly for self-defense. We have little difficulty concluding that it does.

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms.

Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry.

Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.

After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant elsewhere. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. “[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”.

The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees petitioners Koch and Nash a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need. That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.

New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment in that it prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further pro- ceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.”

Several other Great Comments!

they were trying to rush the legislation thru before the ruling came out.

now the ruling came out early and is going to make their new law obsolete

they know it is Unconstitutional and will NOT hold up in court... just like Biden wanting to 'Mandate' jabs... he knew it was Unconstitutional, and even stated that he did not have the AUTHORITY to mandate it... BUT- was going to do it anyways, because people would already be jabbed before it ever made it to the Supreme Court... jus like the 'gun ban/red flag' laws... they know it is illegal but, how many will cower and what damage will be done before it hits the Supreme Court!! THOSE are the Questions you should ask yourselves!

I saw that too.

The ROE decision will be tomorrow.

Buckle up

Unauthorized thinking: -1 social credit point
Colluding with other unauthorized thinkers: -2 social credit points
Failure to report both unauthorized thought crimes: -10 social credit points

You two are in trouble now, boy howdy.

:obamy:

To set precedent for protecting 2A

this is what the navajo called, a lizard tizzy

they didnt have numbers without RINOS in an election year that have no fear because the know....

someone mentioned in another thread arms means ammo too.

Thread: baby formula of ammo: BREAKING: Biden Administration Moves to Cut Off Lake City .223/5.56 Ammo From the Commercial Market

Arms-.
weapons and ammunition; armaments.
and then there is this 30% of


Thread: Susan Rice Calling Shots Behind Biden Admin’s Gun-Control Push

[link to headlineusa.com (secure)]

they didnt have numbers without RINOS in an election year that have no fear because the know....

someone mentioned in another thread arms means ammo too.

Thread: baby formula of ammo: BREAKING: Biden Administration Moves to Cut Off Lake City .223/5.56 Ammo From the Commercial Market

Winchester manufacturs here but GOvt owns the faciility.

Arms-.
weapons and ammunition; armaments.
and then there is this 30% of


Thread: Susan Rice Calling Shots Behind Biden Admin’s Gun-Control Push

[link to headlineusa.com (secure)]

Last Edited by Coastie Patriot on 06/23/2022 02:43 PM