Fired a few months ago from hospital RN job over covid stuff and ....

You just keep saying it till you hit the right judge. Demand jury trial, not administrative court. All cases like this lose at the lower level where you have judges that don't know the law. 70% of them win on appeal. You'll win in the end as long as you're persistent.

I know this stuff because I work in law.

Also, this is from Robert Barnes Locals site that he said: came to him from a genie in a bottle to be shared with everyone near and far, kind of thing so to share it:

Dear Boss,
First, I request a religious exemption. "Each of the manufactures of the Covid vaccines currently available developed and confirmed their vaccines using fetal cell lines, which originated from aborted fetuses. ( [link to lozierinstitute.org (secure)] ) For example, each of the currently available Covid vaccines confirmed their vaccine by protein testing using the abortion-derived cell line HEK-293. ( [link to lozierinstitute.org (secure)] ) Partaking in a vaccine made from aborted fetuses makes me complicit in an action that offends my religious faith. As such, I cannot, in good conscience and in accord with my religious faith, take any such Covid vaccine at this time. In addition, any coerced medical treatment goes against my religious faith and the right of conscience to control one’s own medical treatment, free of coercion or force. As fellow governments recognize: "Religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief. Religious beliefs are not only those beliefs held by traditional, organized religions, but also include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right or wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views." ( [link to www.tn.gov (secure)] Please provide a reasonable accommodation to my belief, as I wish to continue to be a good employee, helpful to the team.

Equally, compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisors of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. ( [link to www.kff.org (secure)]
Three key concerns: first, informed consent is the guiding light of all medicine, in accord with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their perceived medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment, education or public accommodations upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possible suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment. As one federal court just recently held, the availability of reasonable accommodations like accounting for prior infection, antibody testing, temperature checks, remote work, other forms of testing, and the like suffice to meet any institution’s needs in lieu of masks, public shaming, and forced injections of foreign substances into the body that the FDA admits we do not know the long -term effects of.
For instance, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be amongst your most effective, efficient and profitable employees?
This right to refuse forced injections, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( [link to www.cirp.org] ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is.

Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. ( [link to www.eeoc.gov (secure)] An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness, and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] )

Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others." ( [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]

With Regards,

Employee of the Year,
Thomas Paine"

thanks for honesty~!

You are not powerless!

Take charge of your life! Do not surrender it to employers with empty hearts and brains.

May I suggest you all learn to trade Forex. Lots of study. But once you start and you know and live the rewards, you will never depend on anyone again.

Good luck to all.

Peace.

Get a lawyer

Show that they lied. Start with the affirmation that covid kills more than the spanish flu. Extend that all they say is a lie.

Post the 2019 Gillead remdesivir study showing massive death on patient they used it on. Attach the Pfizer document showing 1200 killed and 20000 wounded during initial trails of the vax then state in clear words your employers are complicit in murder because they chose to not do the homework ignored standing research of the drugs they have to so many and sought to profit off miss diagnosis and mistreatment and gross negligence then Condemn to hell in a scathing rebuke of who and what they represent

Should be fun when the hospital director gets to read it.

there are nursing jobs even in the liberal states that let you do at home tests with no nasal crap..

find one of those hospitals and fake the tests...and they are shortstaffed and since covid is fake...as the tests are..no worries

so you can find a new job with a more reasonable hospital

Last Edited by Grove Street (Redux 3.0) on 04/22/2022 08:53 PM

Maybe this group in Washington State can guide you.

[link to www.onewashington.com (secure)]

www.onewashington.com

.

what you wrote about your employer's response does not sound right. There is no way they pass a judgement on you religious belief. Post a copy of the letter for us to evaluate.

Many of us were sending them stuff like that last autumn but they would either dismiss it as conspiracy theory or ignore it completely and not respond. The HR staff too, were so ignorant it blew me away.

I don't know if it is a good tactic to do anything but state that I have a sincerely held religious belief. I don't think that expressing the idea that I truly believe that the whole covid thing is satanic and against god is going go get me anywhere.

You're so right.

Especially: You and people like you need to get together and open private practice clinics in states where you can do this.

This is the future of medicine, and also a different outlook toward health and the body that includes nutritional supplements, lifestyle, and personal health; mind,body, and soul.

Very quietly, this is happening in the UK too.
The National Health Service is failing spectacularly - yet no one is talking about it. Media just reports a bit about waiting times and then just moves onto Kartrashian-type stories or the latest Russian atrocity.
More and more people are quietly finding holistic doctors and clinics.

Tell them they are lying.

how about making them prove the existence of COVID.

Looks like there are many causes of action embedded in the material concerning this post.

In the beginning, the cases will not find a lot of court- traction, but in the near future, these cases and causes of action will become more numerous and obvious, in the court system. Large cases will be filed, many will be class actions, and go on forever, there are a lot of legal fees and tax money, to be made. The court system will become bogged down with caseload.

There will not be any large payouts for these cases, because the cases will be numerous, similar to each other, and will be against the same Plaintiffs.

Remember most of the Judges took the injection, there is a natural bias, Judicial Bias, or bias from the bench. How can you win?.

The regulators will never act against the very people they regulated. Supporting these causes could be admissions of culpability.

There is a bright side, people who did not inject may live better lives.

Last Edited by Voices in my head on 04/22/2022 09:17 PM

Some places the unvaxxed were allowed to comeback due to RN shortages! Seems they lied!

yeah bend over and take it like the rest of the planet

Isn't the covid kill rate under 1%. Spanish Flu was similar or ?

So if this is their argument, it's already flawed.

Same thing happened to me last month, I was working as a PA in a hospital for over a decade. I can't even get unemployment now even though I worked through the whole pandemic, and in the beginning I only got a new mask about every 2 weeks. Would spray with alcohol and reuse. Ugh!! It was gross. I had a religious exemption request that was never aproved. They needed more info, but made sure I didn't get the request for it.
I think no matter what I did they werent going to aprove it anyway. Like you said most of them are brainwashed. Especially in NYC. So I am leaving ASAP.
I don't if you can win the lawsuit, but I wish you the best luck. Please keep us informed of what happens. I havent filed one --too busy getting ready to move. I need to find a job in Florida.

Get a letter supporting your beliefs from your priest or rabbi.

Employer is extremely arrogant to claim to device for your what YOUR religious beliefs are.

Didn't the CDC itself release a document with 19 PAGES of side effects? Pretty dangerous and horrific if you ask me.

It may be a good idea to do research on the differences between "live" and "dead vaccines".
And talk with the lawyer about this; then armed with your knowledge ask the employer if they know about whether these vaccines are dead or live, what are the dead or live viruses contained, if they can't, then what's the point of forcing anyone to be Jab if they can not even explain the differences than just abusing anyone who has a different belief, info, and knowledge about the drugs.

I literally just learned abt it because I am receiving injections for my autoimmune disorder. From the patient brochure, it's not recommended for those who will be receiving live vaccines.

Meanwhile, the specialist I have last seen was suggesting that I should get a booster dose for my liver although not very concerning now but just for protection. I mentioned abt the ongoing injections and I am not supposed to have a live vaccine; he told me, well, you can get a dead vaccine.

I am reading now more into this becAUSE I THOUGHT THAT ALL VACCINES ARE WEAKENED, ATTENUATED VIRUSES.

Good luck, you are more knowledgeable and smarter than them.

^ This also

Someone else can't claim to know what your religious beliefs are, they are yours. Expound on your religious beliefs and put them in a Statutory Declaration.

Ultimately, just stick to your convictions.

Please don't give up --that's what they are counting on -that people run out of money or time and give up.
Did you try this?

Thread: List of lawyers that are in the fight for free against employers- Please add to list

in case people were wondering...

Most hospitals retain the services of a literal "lawyer war machine" for all the lawsuits that pop up.

At best you might be able to get an out of court settlement, because they dont want to waste their time fighting you.

But to be clear...They have ZERO fear of losing to individual lawsuits brought up against them.

In 20 years I've only known one employee sue and win an employment case, and that was because they actual did something over the line.

This will simply be a case of: We reserve the right to fire anyone at anytime, for any reason.

Better off joining a class action lawsuit if you want to get anywhere...but that could take years...a decade...

What constitutes the proper, expected and legal response to proof of your religious beliefs is why you need the advise of an attorney that deals with EEOC cases.

The attorney can site the relevant laws and codes in the reply. You can't.

Ever heard the saying that only a fool is his own attorney?

You're not a fool but you want to play the other guys game and that guy knows all the tricks. Thus you need a hired gun.

Add that all the "vaccines" are made with and/or tested with aborted baby tissue.