BREAKING: Mouse in space on SpaceX Launch 30-05-2020

There is a lot of evidence of NASA fraud. Here is a compilation.
[link to youtu.be (secure)]

That's not a mouse. That's ice that came off a vent and is sliding around the manifold.

Why does your video start right off with a blatant lie? That's a clip from a highlights video with a fade transition showing Jeff Williams going around a corner and then coming back out:

It was not raw footage, and you used the fade transition as evidence of fakery. Why did you put that in there and lie to your audience? If you didn't make that video, why did you link to a blatant lie? If you didn't know it was a blatant lie, why didn't you do your homework?

Or it`s the first mouse in space. SPACEMOUSE!

It's not a mouse. Mice actually do ride on Falcon 9's sometimes, IN THE CAPSULE, NOT ON THE FUCKING ROCKET ENGINE. Yes, I know this for a first hand fact...

I'm not lying. How about you instead?

It does look like ice though and I also think humans haven't space travelled. But I think our drones and equipment have, either we travel space and have full bases built and fly around up there all the time, or we just haven't been there. That is it man. Humans dont explore to the moon and just stop. It isnt in our nature. Its one or the other, if we can go there, we would never stop or slow down

You're done here. You want to remove me from the world? You're going to have to do it yourself. Good luck with that, by the way. I'm prepared to defend myself, if needed...

@Astro, what do you make of the recently leaked "We didn't actually go to the Moon" statement?

What are you talking about?

and rockets can land in Reverse. LOL

Yes, they can.

THIS. Of course this keeps getting reposted by morans.

No, they cannot.

Yes, they can.


And they look pretty awesome after they've landed too:
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]

Last Edited by Astromut on 04/07/2022 05:57 PM

Rockets were never engineered to fly backwards, and nothing has
changed in the past 40 years in that regard. What changed is that they developed CGI in the meantime,
so it is now fabulously easy to fake things like that. But there are further problems, since CGI, though
good, is still in its early stages. So it is easy to spot if you know what to look for. The first thing to
look for, of course, is objects breaking the laws of physics or the laws of current tech (or the laws of
perspective). If we see objects doing impossible things, we know they are fake without further
argument. That is what is happening here. In fact, it is a perfect test for those scientists you may
know. If you have any scientists in the family or in the office, ask them what they think of these
rockets landing backwards. If they try to tell you it is no problem, you have them pegged. You know
they are either agents of some sort or are being paid to sell this fake for some other reason. There is no
third possibility. Well, I guess there is one third possibility: they are very

dim and you should never
listen to them again on anything important. Let them take their pick.

Officially,
I think you're an idiot.

Unofficially, your off your MEDS!

It's like the criminals are begging you to notice their
chicanery!

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

It's not a mouse. FFS. It's ice from liquid oxygen.

I don't know what else to tell you man, other than, you got to know stuff goes to space. It's routine now. You need to put your big boy pants on and realize this is how it is.

You know very little about rockets, that's obvious, to even think it's a mouse.

The Fake Blue Origin. Dummies in Space.


[link to mileswmathis.com]

Ignoring evidence because you assume that it's impossible is idiotic and wrong. It's not CGI. I filmed that myself, I have witnessed it myself. I have tracked it myself and I have filmed it all the way from launch to landing in one continuous uncut shot. It is not fake. If you're so confident that it's fake, I will let you control one of my telescopes to film it yourself remotely over the internet. Then you get to explain to my audience how I faked it in real time even though you were in control. How does that sound to you? Are you too scared? Are you too much of a little bitch to put your money where your mouth is? These rockets were engineered to fly backwards and land. That's what they do. I have proven that conclusively, those are my videos and I filmed them myself. I am a scientist you idiot. I work on experiments launched by these rockets, and I have access to see them up close and I have seen them up close right after they've landed. They're not fake, you are an idiot, let's see if you're willing to put your money where your mouth is.

If they try to tell you it is no problem, you have them pegged. You know
they are either agents of some sort or are being paid to sell this fake for some other reason.

That is not a response to anything I said or asked you. Try actually reading before responding. This is your last chance. That is my footage, it is not fake and it is not impossible. I offered you the chance to film it yourself with my equipment over the internet. Do you accept my offer? The next words out of your mouth need to be yes or no. You will respond to what I am saying or you will be done here. You do not get to accuse my footage of being fake or CGI without being willing to back that up. Do I make myself clear?

Last Edited by Astromut on 04/07/2022 07:23 PM

Frozen space mouse!

Looks like they learned a lot from NASA

I warned you. I gave you every chance, but you're so much of a coward that you won't even answer me with a simple yes or no. You're done here, you don't get to accuse me of posting CGI and then bitch out when asked to put your money where your mouth is.

Yes, they can. You can go view them yourself just as thousands of other people have.