Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,635 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 184,751
Pageviews Today: 305,073Threads Today: 98Posts Today: 1,741
03:57 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject The Revelation of the Mystery of the Kingdom of God
Poster Handle Zerubbabel
Post Content
Zerubbabel wrote:










<<I'm a new granpa. My twenty year old, xxxxx, just had a brand new little girl. My wife and my oldest daughter were both pregnant at the same time. She was born within two months of my grandson, and they grew up almost as brother and sister.>>

I'm pretty sure you told me this already in past emails? in fact I still have the one you sent me of your daughter holding the baby in the hospital room... It was precious!

Actually, that was my daughter xxxxx. This most recent granddaughter is just about 3 weeks old. Time goes by fast huh!





Many inspirations lately with all few time! But I've got some things to think about such as how to legally get around Stan Tenens material to use it in my book... After all it "his" model! Yes Stan Tenen will be the clincher. I've been reading up on the copyright laws and something tells me Stan is going to be a stickler! Basically, I would have to get his authorized permission to use/talk/mention any of his material.

Do you know anything about copyright laws? Or any suggestions of how to get around this? Because I don't want to be another xxxxxxxxxx! :(

I don't have a clue about copyright laws. You would have to be very original and refrain from appearing to quote from his material totally. A difficult task to say the least!

Anyhow, about Stans material and model... This is really no secret to the natural world. I mean its evident everywhere in nature such as the unfurling of leaves on a plant... Stan claims his model is not Fibonacci/Phi/GMS because of the back part that flips up, but this is not true... I think the back part is the outside body, just as in a new leaf unfolding.

And besides isn't it mentioned in the Bible that to find proof/evidence of Gd, all one needs to do is look to nature... But Stan holds this as his trademark!

I'm not sure what the back part really signifies except that perhaps it may signify outraying or perhaps even iteration. For example, in a wire-model of a torus, there would have to be iteration to develop the shape in a recognizable form. A simple wire model only outlines the boundaries of the shape. The more lines added gives more precise shape. I'm not sure, but it is a possible answer.

Ok, here is another one that I could use your help on... Genesis has a base 3 number code, but I made the mistake of saying on the forum saying that its the GMS/Phi/Fibonacci when in fact this sequence "is not" the same mathematically, but I'm trying to make the connection of why in Genesis 1 (of creation) Gd gives a base 3 code and not a Fibonacci one?

This is the difference: " [link to www.h-net.org] "This is a base 3 code.
Base 3 uses the digits 0, 1, and 2 to represent numbers. counting in
base 3 goes: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 100, 101, 102, 110, 111, 112, 120, ...

the fibonacci sequence is a sequence of numbers where each is the sum
of the previous two: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, ...

the ratio of successive terms of this approaches (sqrt(5)+1)/2, the
golden ratio.
So there is a difference mathematically.

The answer I'm really after, is a connection between math, nature
and Gd... Why did Gd choose a base 3 code in Genesis 1 rather than a Fibonacci code?

Could it be because like xxx says that there are 3 components of mass, space and time in which Gd had to use as his blueprint to create the Hebrew letters?

Because remember, the first word in the Bible is B'reshith which is translated to mean, "In the Beginning". The word can be broken down into beth, which means "in", esh, which means "fire", and shith, which means either "a thorn" or "the number six", or, a "six thorn". A six thorn is identifiable with a tetrahedron/ pyramid shape, the first Platonic solid with 4 faces, 4 corners and 6 edges when we put a fire (Phi/GMS/Fibonacci sequence) in a tetrahedral this is what creates the Hebrew letters and defines the 22 letter hyperspace positions creating an alphabet and language.

This must be the basic geometric growth structure such as the platonic solids?

But even though Genesis starts out as a base 3 pattern, I have a feeling that the total code like the universe is a scroll, so is the Torah codes...

What do you think???

What little understanding of it seems to imply that that there are several simultaneous processes at work. It's difficult to even perceive, let alone explain, but picture the tree of life. The most basic shape(beyond the initial point) would be the line between the two "points" That "line" could easily become convoluted if we accept that the two "points" are in motion. The third point creates a plane that, again, may be convoluted, and not necessarily triangular in form. Those three basic points can, conceivably interact with the other 7 points on the TOL (in 3d space) to produce a very sophisticated shape--perhaps shapes within shapes(systems within systems?). It may very well be concurrent as oposed to linear. What comes to my mind is that initial discovery I made trying to recreate the universe using a single point. I was using linear thinking. When the computer created 3 other points that converged (separately at the four corners), a structure of space/time emerged that could not be obtained within the simple model. If, however, initial creation emerged at all points simultaneously, it does not necessarily follow that each "system" was EXACTLY like the first. It stands to reason (unless we accept space to be "flat") that its position in space could be observed differently depending on observation. Does this make any sense? In this point of view, "bet" could be part of one system and connected to other systems, spelling an entirely different word or shape. To further complicate it, it could have "non-local" applications as well. I would LOVE to see a model of this in motion. Another not so obvious take on this would be "the wisdom of the Lord is DOUBLE to that which IS". The reason I include this is a simple discussion I was having with a friend. He made a simple attempt to create a simple form. By doubling it, I was able to create the TOL and the 1,3,10 progression. I don't know if this has any bearing on your thoughts and ideas. I'm not even sure it holds water. Read the link I gave you on Divine Cosmos. You may be able to glean some of his information on Sacred Geometry. What little I have read so far has been right on the money. Let me know what you think.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP