| Users Online Now: 2,188 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,011,821 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,881,383 | Threads Today: 908 | Posts Today: 16,416 |
| 08:43 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,188 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,011,821 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,881,383 | Threads Today: 908 | Posts Today: 16,416 |
| 08:43 PM | ||
The James Webb Teloscope Pictures Look As Fake As The Moon Landing. | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79221027  United Kingdom03/07/2022 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JD User ID: 69071202  Canada03/07/2022 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 82368895 03/07/2022 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80082094  Portugal03/07/2022 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nuclear weapons themselves being fake mind you: Nuclear threat is FAKE Thread: Nuclear threat is FAKE Their 'science' being the material representation of occult philosophies; e.g. the 'splitting of the atom/adam'; the 'double helix structure of (fake) dna'; the macrocosmos representing the microcosmos, i.e. 'as above, so below' occult philosophy buuuuullllllshhhhhhiitt. Circular reasoning based on lies. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80989490  United States03/07/2022 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. Based on what you are saying you are stunningly uneducated and unqualified to offer your opinion on anything more complicated than a game of tic-tac-toe. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81658693 United States03/07/2022 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are comparing apples to carrots. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80082094 The James Webb is an infrared telescope. Humble observes in the visible spectrum. But after reading your post, I don't expect you to understand the implications of this... Then tell us, wise one, tell us why these infrared cameras cannot show us beyond the 'terminator' of the moon; when the sun shines directly on the moon, from the opposite side of the sky, and still nothing beyond this 'terminator' can be seen. Yet the very next day, the moon will be seen full only when the sun has set on the opposite side of the sky. Yet nothing is ever able to be seen beyond the 'terminator'... |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. Based on what you are saying you are stunningly uneducated and unqualified to offer your opinion on anything more complicated than a game of tic-tac-toe. You abilities to reason as a man have been clearly displayed.. |
Robotanimal
 User ID: 82265817 United States03/07/2022 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nuclear weapons themselves being fake mind you: Quoting: JD 69071202 Nuclear threat is FAKE Thread: Nuclear threat is FAKE Their 'science' being the material representation of occult philosophies; e.g. the 'splitting of the atom/adam'; the 'double helix structure of (fake) dna'; the macrocosmos representing the microcosmos, i.e. 'as above, so below' occult philosophy buuuuullllllshhhhhhiitt. Circular reasoning based on lies. Had another good thread from way back but it just went missing when I started bringing it up: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist - FAKE HOAX LIES Quoting: JD 68942346 [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Nuclear threat is FAKE Thread: Nuclear threat is FAKE ... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81544519 United States03/07/2022 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are comparing apples to carrots. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80082094 The James Webb is an infrared telescope. Humble observes in the visible spectrum. But after reading your post, I don't expect you to understand the implications of this... Then tell us, wise one, tell us why these infrared cameras cannot show us beyond the 'terminator' of the moon; when the sun shines directly on the moon, from the opposite side of the sky, and still nothing beyond this 'terminator' can be seen. Yet the very next day, the moon will be seen full only when the sun has set on the opposite side of the sky. Yet nothing is ever able to be seen beyond the 'terminator'... [link to youtube.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81544519 United States03/07/2022 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are comparing apples to carrots. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80082094 The James Webb is an infrared telescope. Humble observes in the visible spectrum. But after reading your post, I don't expect you to understand the implications of this... Then tell us, wise one, tell us why these infrared cameras cannot show us beyond the 'terminator' of the moon; when the sun shines directly on the moon, from the opposite side of the sky, and still nothing beyond this 'terminator' can be seen. Yet the very next day, the moon will be seen full only when the sun has set on the opposite side of the sky. Yet nothing is ever able to be seen beyond the 'terminator'... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81829596 United States03/07/2022 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. They are not only graphic artists, They are masonic con artists as well. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74123386 United States03/07/2022 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are comparing apples to carrots. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80082094 The James Webb is an infrared telescope. Humble observes in the visible spectrum. But after reading your post, I don't expect you to understand the implications of this... Then tell us, wise one, tell us why these infrared cameras cannot show us beyond the 'terminator' of the moon; when the sun shines directly on the moon, from the opposite side of the sky, and still nothing beyond this 'terminator' can be seen. Yet the very next day, the moon will be seen full only when the sun has set on the opposite side of the sky. Yet nothing is ever able to be seen beyond the 'terminator'... And that's probably the best retort you'll see!!Ahaha:) |
| JD User ID: 69071202 Canada03/07/2022 02:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. They are not only graphic artists, They are masonic con artists as well.  |
| SomeRandomPerson
User ID: 79771883 United States03/07/2022 03:05 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. FFS, it's still being calibrated. You simply aren't smart enough to understand these kinds of thing, sorry to tell you that, but it's obvious. I believe in science NOT religion. Giving me bad karma for that, is anti-religious (you're passing judgement) I am just a man. Of no significance. Who found religion to be full of lies, and wrong doing, conflicted teachings I understand microwave communications. I do not stand for the NWO, it sucks. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77933201 United States03/07/2022 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 82368895 03/07/2022 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I thought the first photos, which will be x-rays, wont be available until around 6 months after the launch, due to them having to set it up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81658693 OP got his tinfoil hat on early to beat the rush Guys who like Pretty Pictures think they understand "Science." Lol. Do you think the nice colors on the Webb Teloscope pictures are real colors out there in space? Yes? Lol. You cannot answer. |
| Cupes
User ID: 80855651 03/07/2022 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures showing a "colorful" soup of individual stars, clusters, and galaxies floating around in clean contrast. No vast areas of Cosmic dust, no webbed-appearing clusters of many Galaxies as shown in previous images of deep space, no huge nebulae at a near focus, no distorted light from gravity sinks. No small starry lights in the distant field similar to those seen from Earth. No colliding galaxies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82368895 As phoney looking as the shiney clean gold foil coverings on the Lunar Lander Feet after supposedly kicking up a dust cloud. As phoney looking as the "Globe Earth" pictures failing to show a non-Sunlit side of the Earth and not showing the light blue opaque sky we see from Earth's surface. As phoney as the "atmospheric nuclear tests" in the 1960s which were actually attempts to blow a hole in the Firmament. Lol. These fake Astronomers and their fake pictures are beyond belief. And, you people fall for it. Stupid fuck shit will not be 100% till june the first proper images of space captured by the James Webb Space Telescope, which should be captured around June or early July 2022 |
| 2moreweeks
User ID: 74077149 United States03/07/2022 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
