Two 12-year-old girls from Indiana were arrested for allegedly torturing another girl at a sleepover

You can't prove your position using numbers or statistics, only stuff you post is nonsensical like multiplying .12(23.5) and getting 2.82 and thinking that is a relevant number and not completely meaningless.

Its possible you're correct and the table I'm referencing is only showing per capita death rates. I've never seen that before, but I'll concede that's possible. But that still doesn't save you. 11.6% of heart disease deaths is STILL TOO HIGH for 12% of the population, which was my original point and still stands.

Furthermore, you are still only focusing on ONE statistic that I provided in support of my argument, that is dishonest. Other statistics also clearly support my position, like arrest stats. Both Cancer and Heart disease deaths are TWO HIGH for our proportion of the population as well. Both stand at 12% which means we're overrepresented for both if we're only 12% of the population. Those should be 3% and 3% respectively if we're only 12% of the population.

That's not true. Its completely dishonest for you to dismiss my entire argument just because you were right about a small footnote. I've already conceded that my interpretation of that table is likely incorrect. I've never seen governments provide statistics in a per capita format. But that's actually not relevant to my argument. And I've cited many other statistics that are NOT per capita like arrest stats which support my position. In short, you have only won a small footnote, the main thrust of my argument remains.

Also notice something, CUAUCASIANS ARE NOWHERE STATED TO BE 79% of the population. So these death rates indicate both that Cuaucasians are overrepresented for heart disease deaths, and that indigenous N.egroes are underrepresented for them. By these numbers, at 11% of heart disease deaths, we should be around 33-40% of the population. Thank you for correcting my understanding of that table.

You are so stupid that you think 12% of the population make up 12% of heart disease deaths that means 100% of that population has heart disease. In order for that to be true, there would have to be ~42,000,000 black people dying with heart disease. No where did anyone make that claim.

In fact, if you look, I claimed ~78,000 black people died of heart disease in 2015. 78,000/630,000(total heart disease deaths in 2015) = .123 AKA ~12%. That 12% isn't 42,000,000 people it is 78,000 people.

Like holy fuck that is some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

I already gave you the numbers and proven my position.


Rather than just admit you lack understanding, you double down and insist that 12% of a population being represented as 12% of a statistic means 100% of that population is in that statistic and demonstrate how fucking stupid you are because that literally isn't how shit works.

:bad_egg::bad_smile::anger:

it's hilaruous all the sh!ll agents desperately trying to mitigate the genetic facts.. blacks are fundamentally different in cognative abilities temperament and impulsivity compared to european whites

That's not stupid. Its called population sampling and representative statistics. You're so stupid that you want to now forget about per capita when you've spent all this time trying to state that we're more criminal than you per capita. That's been you're entire defense behind the FBI's crime stats, that "per capita you commit way more crimes than your population representation".

Well, That argument applies to EVERYTHING, not just the stats you want to cherry pick. If we're only 12% of the population then its highly unlikely that we're also 12% of heart disease deaths. As well as 12% of cancer deaths. And (.9*)54% of murder deaths. That's called statistics. You might've been right about that misleadingly titled table, but you're wrong about this.

It doesn't matter the total number of people that died, dumbass. Its about population representation. The fact that the total numbers don't reflect that IS JUST PROOF THAT THE CENSUS IS WRONG YOU IDIOT! If we're 12% of the population, we're not going to be 12% of the cancer deaths because that's way more than cancer kills representatively.

"In fact, if you look, I claimed ~78,000 black people died of heart disease in 2015. 78,000/630,000(total heart disease deaths in 2015) = .123 AKA ~12%. That 12% isn't 42,000,000 people it is 78,000 people. "

We're not black you are. That aside, your argument just proves the point. 100% of people don't die from heart disease that's the point. So if we're 12% of the population, you'd expect our death rates to match the normal 1/4 that the CDC claims heart disease kills at. 1/4th of 12% is 3%. You wouldn't expect us to be 12% of the population, 12% of cancer deaths, 12% of heart disease deaths, etc. You would expect us to be 30-40% of the population with those numbers.

Of course the total number of people that died is important. That is literally how the statistical representation is calculated when making comparisons regarding death causes.

1/4 of 12% is 3% is something someone with no education in maths or statistics would say.

23.5% is approximately 1/4th. Of 100% of "black people" deaths, 23.5% of those deaths were heart disease. There isn't some kind of lie or false statistic here other than the ones you present.

Adding up 12% of heart disease deaths, 12% of cancer deaths, etc doesn't mean your population has to be almost 40%. If your population was 40%, one would expect you to represent ~40% of those deaths to be statistically consistent.

Your hatred and anger won't allow you to accept that you are wrong.

Its not important when you're using representative statistics. The whole point is to extrapolate to the general population from a small sample size of the total population.

I haven't provided any false statistics, everything I've provided was sourced. And that table was trickily worded. But my argument still stands. So are you saying that your racist position about per capita murders is not accurate then?

1/4 of 12% is 3% is something someone with no education in maths or statistics would say relative to this discussion.

1/4 of 100% is 25%.

23.5% is approximately 25%.

Multiplying 1/4 times 12% is asinine and has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.

Look, you don't have any right to talk about hatred or anger or not admitting I'm wrong. I'm the only one who admitted I'm wrong even though I've definitely beaten 4 or 5 of you in this thread alone. So you're projecting. And you are the ones who use YOUR HATRED and YOUR ANGER to make racist arguments against the indigenous. Then when someone does the same thing to you, all of the sudden "per capita statistics don't make sense". Get out of here, you're a hypocrite and a phony.

I haven't provided any false statistics, everything I've provided was sourced. And that table was trickily worded. But my argument still stands. So are you saying that your racist position about per capita murders is not accurate then?

100% of the N.egro population is 12% of the population according to you. So if 1/4 of our deaths are heart disease, then our heart disease death should be 3%, not 12%.

You only talk about the one thing that I got wrong, the cleverly worded table, but that still doesn't disprove my argument at ALL! You haven't dealt with the main thrust of my argument and you are not acknowledging that your position abandons the racist "buh buh muh crime stats" argument you've always made too.

I've been arguing through this entire thread and I've beaten everyone I argued with. NONE OF YOU ADMITTED YOU WERE WRONG, you just slinked away from argument to argument. And you're going to ignore that and pretend like you guys have admitted where you were wrong when you haven't. That makes you a coward and a piece of shit.

First of all, we're not black, YOU ARE. Under international law the word black means CRIMINAL and FOREIGNER. N.egroes are indigenous to the Americas and Cuaucasians are colonizing foreigners from Europe, which means you are BLACK.

Secondly, N.egroes do NOT hate light skin people by default. Cuaucasians use divide and conquer and because you're so insecure, stupid and superficial you treat people with lighter skin better than you do people with darker skin.

Because you're jealous you don't have melanin you attack those who do. This has been documented ALL THROUGHOUT Latin America as well as the States. Cuaucasians are just so insecure that they have to not only hate everyone who doesn't look like them, but they have to DENY IT AND PROJECT THAT HATRED ONTO OTHERS TOO.

Cuaucasians constantly seek to divide and conquer so you can't attack them back because you're too busy attacking their charges. That's why they created swirling so that they could steal genetics while using their swirler beaus as a deflection shield. "You wouldn't attack one of your own would you?! Teee heee being an insecure, scheming, machiavellian asshole is GREAT!"

Finally, light skin N.egroes have ALWAYS existed in the Amer'icas. Early European explorers noted that there were three races of N.egro extant, those with dark brown skin, those medium brown and otherwise lightskin people. N.egroes are genetically much more diverse than Cuaucasians and we ourselves come in different phenotypes with different skin colors and hair textures. Of course, we're all still N.egroes.

Hardly any freed slave went to Libera, I do know that some Africans who came here willingly to work, there was in the thousands went back, the other blacks didn't want to work with I don't know why only the recorded said, the black who were slaves here didn't like them, they were no longer of them see some blacks were here as long as whites were. After being freed they didn't want to go, one woman told them they had just trained the whites and they didn't want to leave.
You have to understand the real relationship of blacks and whites in a lot of the south, you take a woman who had many children, then dies, this happened a lot in Southern family's childbirth ended women's lives, the one who raised and cared for them was their nanny, and they loved her and others. I know what people claim is not always the case.

There was one black slave owner in South Carolina who went to Libera, he did start a plantation and had I think something like 80 slaves there. He then wanted to come back to the US, so he came ahead and through another man who was white helped him buy another plantation, then he wanted to import his slaves, by law he could not do it, he and that white guy manage to do some lying and they brought them into another port them up to the plantation, he was what they called a breeder he had women barring children to sell, he was very rich. I do know others talked about this type of person, not in good in any way they, when the older blacks told this and so did the older whites neither wanted anything to do with this type of man. These are people who were elderly when I was young and they told stories, and I just listen, you learn a lot that way.

Now this man wasn't the one these others were talking about, it seems there were more black plantation owners who did this, they couldn't import them so they start a new business.
I am just thankful there weren't that many doing this. The guy from South Carolina died and one of his sons went back to Africa doing the same thing as they did before they came back. Slavery in Africa was normal then and they are still doing it, just not broadcasting them selling other people in markets. They sure are not the only ones doing this and all the slaves aren't black, the trafficking in humans is slavery. They are selling human beings. It is also a very large problem.

I hope Haiti has improved some, one side of the island is a whole lot different than the other side, they did not get the fund to help them much after the disaster. One of my daughters and her husband went there on a trip to help one summer and not much had changed, after they found out they weren't the ones that caused problems, they were friendly, she did say things were really bad even with not having much food. This broke her heart because they couldn't afford much to help as much as they needed help.

Most plantation owners in the usa were the special people