AMAZING: The fully jabbed are twice as likely to die of Covid than the unjabbed - latest Scottish data out now!!!!

C'mon man give yourself some credit. I'm sure your IQ isn't that low...

The fake fact checkers are here.

Examples of those so low in intelligence that they have no way of knowing just how stupid they really are..

Horse shit.
Spreading disinformation and fear. You should be jailed

Lol sucks to suck! I have covid for the 2nd or 3rd time right now.

I guess if you didn't eat healthy growing up you're paying for it now!

And if you were born with a health condition, that's life!

Disinformation?


It is a chart with facts. This effects fit what is really happening?


Who should be jailed here? Holding up the globalist narrative?

Last Edited by Zions Fled on 02/04/2022 09:45 PM

THUS

THE obvious ? and elephant in the room to me is this.

Y the fuck is the RED X-ROSS not separating the damn true BLOODS from the JABBED BLOOD donors?

I have no clue if anyone watches TELL-U-A-VISION or not

but on a recent show of "CHICAGO MED" -- the episode (part of it) was about a NON-VAXXED pregnant woman

She refused a blood transfusion if "she needed it" unless they could guarantee the blood was pure, and of course, no hospital can do that b/c it's not separated.

In the end, she had to have a C-section, the baby was fine, but mom ends up dying due to lack of blood supply.

Thought that was interesting they did that, that way to show to the general sheep, who prolly have no idea whatsoever.

She was portrayed as a "NUT CASE/CONSPIRACY Person" b/c she was unvaxxed --- and then dies b/c she's too stupid to take blood that could have spike proteins flowing through it.

OF COURSE

The best part is the fact the current TRUTH being promoted is that the mRNA jabs don't have any affect on the blood.

Last Edited by MISTER-BEE on 02/04/2022 09:46 PM

Dear farm-a-troll,

Grasp this with your brilliant mind:

It's an experimental drug and the experiment is far from over.

Love,

from a tard

BOT or not

NO such thing as COVID (is true)

in the way we are told what COVID-19 "supposedly is"

It indeed does not exist whatsoever

THE SUPPOSED "novel" virus is called SARS-CoV-2

THE fact is SARS-CoV-2 was done/finished in silico, which means via a COMPUTER, in CHINA

THUS -- the symptoms of COVID, derived from the supposed "NOVEL" SARS-CoV-2 "VIRUS" is what leads to be termed having COVID-19

OF COURSE, in order to have COVID-19 (aka the SARS-CoV-2) VIRUS, one has to test + for COVID aka the VIRUS

BUT there's never been an approved test for COVID-19

NOW, when FRAUDCI comes out talking about his Gain of Function and all the CRISPR work, etc. etc. and telling everyone it's a BIO-WEAPON (If anything was actually released) so be it....

In the mean time, the sheep are still lining up for a real bio-weapon death jab clot shot

carry on

Has the bonus money to hospitals for ~covid~ ventilations and deaths ended?

One could imagine that the medical community have the goods on certain institutions and the people who run them for the top dogs. They've grown quite fond of the extra payments, too, and plausible deniability easily exists for a number of players in this thing.

Nah, Scotland is at 90% vaxxed rate.

So the numbers don't show that at all. Your title would make sense if it was 50% vaxx rate.

That's the doctored stats they've been using to try and justify the vaxx, with the dubious 'study' bullshit CDC is cooking up from random hospital data.

I think the last one is at least you died virtuously protecting your fellow human by doing what you were told, removing your filthy carbon footprint in the process.

COVID doesn't exist

Yes at this site all the misinfo and disinfo is not misinfo or disinfo.

The mRNA jabs...

1. Help to prevent infection.

2. Help to prevent the spread of COVID.

3. Make you less likely to have a severe case.

Pre Omicron.

Currently all that the old vaccines do is make you less likely to have a severe case.

The only thing illogical is taking an experimental treatment for a virus you’re not at risk for.

The only thing illogical is taking an experimental treatment for a virus you’re not at risk for.

All drugs are experimental, you dumb fuck

If the jab does not do anything at all(i.e. it is old plain saline jab) then the ratio of vaccinated over unvaccinated in the hospitals would be the same as the ratio vaccinated/unvaccinated in the entire population. So, I think the graph shows the waning immunity and in the last columns shows no immunity at all(or just about it).

But if Scotland is about 70%(I think it is) this graph does NOT show that vaxxed are in worse position then unvaxxed. They are not in better nor worse position. From the graph, it appears they are in exactly the same boat. Waning vaxx.

Time will tell if this changes.

Last Edited by fiora.ni on 02/04/2022 10:57 PM

Well then, the ferrets done died and you injected yourself with it.

Help lol how do you know? Did you get Covid prior and post jab.

Old vaccines didn’t help they prevented an infection. How many people get tetanus post shot?

No all drugs I’ve taken are FDA approved. zero Covid shots under the FDA approved name are available. That’s a pre approval for shots available in the future.

An honorable death not supporting orange man bad. Honestly half of them would line up.

It hasn't been tested, it uses medical technology that has never been used before and it's makers take no liability for it whatsoever. If you think it's like all drugs then you are the dumbest of all dumb fucks.

No news media outlets in the USA will report any of this. Ever.

The problem with the graph is that it doesn’t address other possible contributors to death. In other words, what else do they know about the fully jabbed versus unjabbed? Are the fully jabbed older, have certain diseases, have different diets, more wealthy/less wealthy, smokers, live alone or with others, employed or unemployed, physically active, in debt, eat lots of red and processed meats, etc.

I agree the jabs are bad. But in dealing with empirical number sets one must consider something so as to not self deceive.

If we look at a given country say for example Israel where most took the jabs. The un jabbed are lets approx. 10% the jabbed at 90% for the sake of an approx. argument.

Since the pool of the jabbed is 90% the deaths would be greater simply because there is a larger pool of numbers to glean from.

So the jabbed numbers would certainly show as higher than the un jabbed group of 10% populace.

Only if the graft was balanced 50 / 50 jabbed and un jabbed could the deaths of each group be shown graphically true.

So many statisticians who graph such things use a balancer weight to create more realistic graphs. Was this the case for this particular graph or just a tool for shock value?

Either way the reader of this post is wiser.

Most adults have had their jabs, so it is hardly surprising a larger number of Vaxxed are dying (after being tested for Covid19).

MANY Jocks lead unhealthy lives, so likely to die due to Covid19 co-morbidity complications.

"twice as likely to die" is a totally misleading statement.

Contrary to popular belief, red meat is good for you.