Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations | |
Sisyphusrock
User ID: 81656341 United States 01/14/2022 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .. Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 01/14/2022 11:07 AM “I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.” |
Sisyphusrock
User ID: 81656341 United States 01/14/2022 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: laughnow12 Yeah but if terminated due to no vax now with SCOTUS ruling, companies can be sued, class action style. Wrong You're an idiot. Watch and learn. The ruling only prevented the Federal Government from mandating the vaccine, not private business. Yet you call me an idiot and don't even understand the ruling and are trying to insult someone that actually knows what's going on. . Of course they could try to coerce you, just that they open themselves up to lawsuit if they try, fail, then fire you . There's is clear precedent for this . Hint: the vax being pushed still isn't the one that was approved . Here is another suggestion : Go to Duck Duck go ( dun use google ) and do a search for lawsuits arising from this very issue , the literally MILLIONS of them . Then watch as this policy crumbles via free market prsssure over the next two months . Then search for the huge precedent of civil case law in this country going back a very long time . You will find your arrogance is unfounded in anything other than an inflated sense of cognitive / research abilities ..and or perspective . Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 01/14/2022 11:11 AM “I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74178163 United States 01/14/2022 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday. But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement. Quoting: 442 [link to www.barrons.com (secure)] asswipes Simple solution - don't work there. They will have a reduced pool of prospective employees, plus their vaxxed will be dead or dying soon enough. And don't shop there, or attend there or give any company that requires vaccination anything whatsoever. Starve the beast. |
1-2-Follow
User ID: 81230252 United States 01/14/2022 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comments in this thread are basically all right, and wrong at the same time. Quoting: Mangia Yes the SCOTUS ruled a stay, however, they pushed it back to the state level, so companies that are situated in liberal states, and have liberal bosses will suffer still. Can they eventually sue, sure but winning case laws will need to be established first. well thank god we have you here to set us all straight Last Edited by 1-2-Follow on 01/14/2022 11:14 AM Articles and "news" from liberal media shall now be known as catnip for libtards. Truth is schilling in the empire of retards. "Yep but for now we dub you toast guy." - AC520845 *PROCLAIMED PROPHET OF THE DOW* ® Let me know when the climate STOPS changing, then i'll be worried. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77424584 Austria 01/14/2022 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what the SCOTUS did yesterday is a 3/4 lose for the Americans, it was pure charade of a decision Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75992367 they decided like the Government can not enact the mandates, but private businesses can still do it, so if you're living in Liberal ruled areas, you're fucked another point is, that hospitals that get the MEDICARE AND MEDICAID aid, means the Government is refunding 70% of their operating and servicing costs, will also have to mandate it per the SCOTUS ruling, so in essence the plan is this, on the long run, they'll seek to destroy the small and medium businesses in order then for the Government to have the chance to bail them out, thus if they'll want the money that will save them from bankruptcy, you'll get the funds, but you'll need to take the jabs same as those above mentioned hospitals and the people working in them it's basically a tool to destroy the Capitalism and usher in Communism, in the end, the agenda is to NATIONALIZE these businesses and operations, with one word, CORPORATIZATION (The result of corporatization is the creation of state-owned corporations (or corporations at other government levels, such as municipally owned corporations) of everything you know and in order to work, do businesses with them, you'll have to take the jabs, see how this works...the plebs always get fucked heh |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74178163 United States 01/14/2022 11:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: 1-2-Follow so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine? as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will. name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed. Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations. do they? thats on the application? pretty sure its illegal for them to ask for any of your medical history via the americans with disabilities act. (edit: oh i see you said "health care provider", which is a bit different than what we are talking about here with other workplaces) i have NEVER been asked for any proof of vaccination ever or medical history to apply for a job, have you? You asked for an example of “one drug or medical treatment” a business can “force on their employee.” I provided three. Yes, in a hospital setting, vaccinations are required to prevent the spread of disease. Does that surprise you? Hospital workers have always had exemptions from 'mandatory' vaccines. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80474317 United States 01/14/2022 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The best advice I can give you : Simple : "I would like that in writing" . "I want to see a signed letter with a direct order for the Vaxx compliance." I need the signature of the person requiring this and It needs to specifically state my name directing ME to be vaxxed or I'm fired". |
Sisyphusrock
User ID: 81656341 United States 01/14/2022 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ruling only prevented the Federal Government from mandating the vaccine, not private business. Yet you call me an idiot and don't even understand the ruling and are trying to insult someone that actually knows what's going on. Yes you are an idiot. I never said stupid corps will no longer force their employees to get the poison. They will be open to massive liability and will be sued into oblivion plain and simple. Exactly this . They can continue to attempt any unlawful direction that they retardedly choose ...and get sued into oblivion for it . It's like he doesn't common sense . “I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.” |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 81004338 Canada 01/14/2022 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do what Robert Barnes, top attorney, said: 1. You get it in statement, policy statement writing. Because these guys are slippery eels, if they lay you off and say its because of the vaxx requirement but its actually not in writing as their policy, then in court they say you were incompetent and lie. 2. You find out what their insurance and health insurance coverage is, for the experimental vaxx? In case of injury and death. Often these companies don't even know the half of it, and rely in CNN. Many folded when those 2 demands were put in. 3. Then you demand they speak with their malpraciticing corporate lawyers to see why they're giving illegal advice, since Supreme Court just insured we can sue and appeal and own your company? Do they have Big Pharma as clients? Again many companies withdraw demands at this point. 4. Then you demand a religious exemption and point out that the SC ruling assured that the mandates are illegal but in the health care field, ROBUST RELIGOUS AND MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS WERE GRANTED IN THE JUDGEMENT. You tell them the legal definition of a religious exemption is a strong moral belief that cannot be questioned or refused, and cannot have any penalty such as unpaid leave attached or loss of job security as it is religious discrimination, and you give an example: Buck Versus Bell of the 1920's started the Eugenics era that saw many poor women sterilized and bodily integrity destroyed. Hitler praised the decision and based his eugenics on it. WW2 overturned that with robust laws and the Nuremburg Code, and informed VOLUNTARY consent, and you believe in execution of those who violate it very strongly and that is international law, so its an extremely strong moral belief. ONLY THE STUPIDEST COMPANIES CONTINUE, AND THEY'RE LAW SUITS. Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 01/14/2022 11:28 AM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Sisyphusrock
User ID: 81656341 United States 01/14/2022 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81107803 Yes you are an idiot. I never said stupid corps will no longer force their employees to get the poison. They will be open to massive liability and will be sued into oblivion plain and simple. Are you a lawyer? Do you know what you’re talking about? No and no. Companies are well within their rights to mandate a jab. The ruling just says the government can’t mandate it as part of an OSHA regulation, and even then, the ruling only temporarily enjoins enforcement of the rule while the case continues to make its way through the courts. Please, do go on about companies getting “sued into oblivion” lol. Watch and learn corporate idiot. What law are they going to be suing under? Um let's see....um maybe discrimination ? You are not long on common sense are you “I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73288091 United States 01/14/2022 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79508218 United States 01/14/2022 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81848627 01/14/2022 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Deplorable Zenobia
User ID: 81107037 United States 01/14/2022 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Am calling it now, people...you can watch which businesses actually go thru' insurance carrier changes on different levels. E.g., big company that mandates, insurance provider either drops customer altogether or cost skyrockets up. And thought struggles against the results, trying to avoid those unpleasant results while keeping on with that way of thinking. That is what I call 'sustained incoherence.' ...David Bohm “How, O Zenobia, hast thou dared to insult Roman emperors?” ...Aurelian, 44th Emperor of the Roman Empire |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80730486 United States 01/14/2022 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80730486 United States 01/14/2022 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most states have their own osha too. Supreme Court basically told them to do it at the state level. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78970623 Its my feeling this isn't over yet. Thank god states like Florida exist. We don't have a state level OSHA, though Desantis toyed with creating one to get out of the fed OSHA rules. Even if we had one, Florida's track record sofar means we wouldn't have vaxxxx mandate. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66285793 Netherlands 01/14/2022 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70899557 United States 01/14/2022 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80730486 United States 01/14/2022 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We're still screwed here in NYC regardless. Can't find a job anywhere that doesn't require the jab. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79523846 Sounds like youre 100% screwed in NYC, not only can you not get a job, but also cant visit any business as a customer without one either. Sounds like it's time to flee NYC |
442
(OP) User ID: 79579101 United States 01/14/2022 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78021703 United States 01/14/2022 12:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My exact prediction from a week ago. Plus more preiction. Ignored now of course. Thread: Update: So was I wrong: Prediction: SC will reject vaccine mandate; Big Corporations will continue anyway; Workers will rebel an burn |
StarF
User ID: 77939003 United States 01/14/2022 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comments in this thread are basically all right, and wrong at the same time. Quoting: Mangia Yes the SCOTUS ruled a stay, however, they pushed it back to the state level, so companies that are situated in liberal states, and have liberal bosses will suffer still. Can they eventually sue, sure but winning case laws will need to be established first. And those states have regulatory agencies they can abuse with more power the OHSA? Nope. They will have to pass laws that are subject judicial review with the BoR firmly incorporated against them. The best proxy we have to understand this is Jacobsen. Everyone should read it. It doesn't say what Libs claimed it does and lays out a clear test that the [non-solution thing] fails. That precedent also resulted in a one-time $5 fine. It's been two years. No one has written a law. Not CA. Not NY. Not DC. Not the Feds. It's all abuse of nebulous "emergency" authority because, as we have suspected, the [non-solution thing] has another purpose and none of these cowards want to be bag holders. Last Edited by StarF on 01/14/2022 01:28 PM Star |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81141716 Switzerland 01/14/2022 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comments in this thread are basically all right, and wrong at the same time. Quoting: Mangia Yes the SCOTUS ruled a stay, however, they pushed it back to the state level, so companies that are situated in liberal states, and have liberal bosses will suffer still. Can they eventually sue, sure but winning case laws will need to be established first. And those states have regulatory agencies they can abuse with more power the OHSA? Nope. They will have to pass laws that are subject judicial review with the BoR firmly incorporated against them. The best proxy we have to understand this is Jacobsen. Everyone should read it. It doesn't say what Libs claimed it does and lays out a clear test that the [non-solution thing] fails. That precedent also resulted in a one-time $5 fine. It's been two years. No one has written a law. Not CA. Not NY. Not DC. Not the Feds. It's all abuse of nebulous "emergency" authority because, as we have suspected, the [non-solution thing] has another purpose and none of these cowards want to be bag holders. so if people pay that 5 dollar fine from back then, think it's 152 dollars in modern amount counting the inflation then means people can buy their vaccination status, the penalty for not taking the jab right? question translated from that Jacobsen ruling |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81141716 Switzerland 01/14/2022 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | $5 in 1905 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $157.92 today, an increase of $152.92 over 117 years. The dollar had an average inflation rate of 2.99% per year between 1905 and today, producing a cumulative price increase of 3,058.50% but if it comes to it, they'll probably strike with hefty in the thousands fines |
Logan Five
User ID: 79300419 Germany 01/14/2022 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vaellene
User ID: 2811365 United States 01/14/2022 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81031467 United States 01/14/2022 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79903529 United States 01/14/2022 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74569170 United States 01/14/2022 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can tell the world has really lost sanity when it's worried more about a bat virus than two nuclear powers in a standoff over a country in Eastern Europe the majority of Americans can't even point out on a map. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66285793 Many of us aren't worried about the scamdemic or one pos countries government bickering with another pos countries government (it's all theater) or the new and current fearmongering bullshit over 5g. |
Hitman_Hart
User ID: 79829163 United States 01/14/2022 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why would you post a video from the Grifter Report? Don't get me wrong, I really like Dr. Zelenko but Dave is still trying to convince people that Q is coming to save them. Last Edited by Hitman_Hart on 01/14/2022 02:44 PM |