Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,014 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 495,397
Pageviews Today: 847,158Threads Today: 369Posts Today: 5,693
10:53 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81644208
United States
01/14/2022 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
I hope these companies than get sued by their employees and families when they start dying from the vaxx
Reebl

User ID: 80322481
United States
01/14/2022 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


You cannot force this… you can try to spin it however you want but mandating an EUA drug is illegal…

The only reason they are doing it is because you people are to stupid and weak to stand up for yourself.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78914227


You clowns don’t get it. I’m saying there is NO LEGAL RECOURSE here in the United States of the type you’re describing. Do you not understand?

I agree with you that it’s wrong and SHOULD be illegal. I’m telling you that it plainly IS legal under established law and precedent for employers to mandate a jab.

Good luck finding a lawyer to represent you. It won’t happen.

thwak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine?

as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will.

name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


Yes, always use a virus that cannot mutate as your go to.

Always the wrong defense for one that is indefensible.

Can't cure Corona/flu/common cold/ with a vaccine. Not possible, the mutations occur rapidly but always diminish in severity. Like a snake eating it's own tail it is futile.

It's the fucking Flu folks. Been dealing with it in one form or another for thousands of years...we are still here.
There is no fortune to be gained by a cure, there is however a great deal of profit to be made from treatments. ~Mark Twain

If you want to live forever, live a life worth remembering. ~Bruce Lee

You will find something in everything if you are looking everywhere for a thing. ~Reebl
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80928359
United States
01/14/2022 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


You clowns don’t get it. I’m saying there is NO LEGAL RECOURSE here in the United States of the type you’re describing. Do you not understand?

I agree with you that it’s wrong and SHOULD be illegal. I’m telling you that it plainly IS legal under established law and precedent for employers to mandate a jab.

Good luck finding a lawyer to represent you. It won’t happen.

thwak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine?

as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will.

name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


do they? thats on the application? pretty sure its illegal for them to ask for any of your medical history via the americans with disabilities act. (edit: oh i see you said "health care provider", which is a bit different than what we are talking about here with other workplaces)

i have NEVER been asked for any proof of vaccination ever or medical history to apply for a job, have you?
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


You asked for an example of “one drug or medical treatment” a business can “force on their employee.” I provided three. Yes, in a hospital setting, vaccinations are required to prevent the spread of disease. Does that surprise you?
1-2-Follow

User ID: 81230252
United States
01/14/2022 10:02 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine?

as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will.

name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


do they? thats on the application? pretty sure its illegal for them to ask for any of your medical history via the americans with disabilities act. (edit: oh i see you said "health care provider", which is a bit different than what we are talking about here with other workplaces)

i have NEVER been asked for any proof of vaccination ever or medical history to apply for a job, have you?
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


You asked for an example of “one drug or medical treatment” a business can “force on their employee.” I provided three. Yes, in a hospital setting, vaccinations are required to prevent the spread of disease. Does that surprise you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359

nah, you're probably right there. congrats. i'm not sure what they require to work in a place like that but would assume you would.

but i wasn't really talking about people working in a hospital or healthcare.

was more referring to places like grocery stores, banks, retail, etc.

Last Edited by 1-2-Follow on 01/14/2022 10:03 AM
Articles and "news" from liberal media shall now be known as catnip for libtards.

Truth is schilling in the empire of retards.

"Yep but for now we dub you toast guy." - AC520845

*PROCLAIMED PROPHET OF THE DOW* ®

Let me know when the climate STOPS changing, then i'll be worried.
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 80828797
Switzerland
01/14/2022 10:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Companies that want to be sued and BOYCOTTED.

I won't do any business with a company that I know mandates phony toxic "vaccines" that don't work.
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 80828797
Switzerland
01/14/2022 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine?

as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will.

name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


do they? thats on the application? pretty sure its illegal for them to ask for any of your medical history via the americans with disabilities act. (edit: oh i see you said "health care provider", which is a bit different than what we are talking about here with other workplaces)

i have NEVER been asked for any proof of vaccination ever or medical history to apply for a job, have you?
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


You asked for an example of “one drug or medical treatment” a business can “force on their employee.” I provided three. Yes, in a hospital setting, vaccinations are required to prevent the spread of disease. Does that surprise you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359

These garbage "vaccines" DO NOT prevent the spread of disease. In fact evidence is mounting that they may make it worse.
StarF

User ID: 77939003
United States
01/14/2022 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
The ultimate stop-gap against an employer mandating tyranny/death was always employees taking their ball and going home -- FIND ANOTHER JOB.

This gov mandate was an attempt to eliminate that option as it incorporated that tyranny/death at every job. It was pure evil and illegal.

Employers can mandate nearly anything they want as long as they can (good faith) claim it impacts productivity or safety. They don't have to qualify that to you or me.

BUT THEY WILL BE LIABLE FOR IT. And that is where the civil courts/system do their work.

Everyone gets this unless you have a learning disability. If an employer doesn't give you any situation you want up-front, you leave/pass on the job. If you are harmed in the course of employment, you sue. Winning a judgement doesn't eliminate the harm you took as a condition of employment!

This is why people needed to stand up against the mandate, no matter the "rules." The ability for employers to be accountable for what they have done doesn't outweigh the risk of the [non-solutiony thing].

You're never going to have a system, in a "free" country, where everyone believes and acts the way you do. The key was being able to associate and work with/for the people you want in your life.

Last Edited by StarF on 01/14/2022 10:09 AM
Star
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80928359
United States
01/14/2022 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


do they? thats on the application? pretty sure its illegal for them to ask for any of your medical history via the americans with disabilities act. (edit: oh i see you said "health care provider", which is a bit different than what we are talking about here with other workplaces)

i have NEVER been asked for any proof of vaccination ever or medical history to apply for a job, have you?
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


You asked for an example of “one drug or medical treatment” a business can “force on their employee.” I provided three. Yes, in a hospital setting, vaccinations are required to prevent the spread of disease. Does that surprise you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359

nah, you're probably right there. congrats. i'm not sure what they require to work in a place like that but would assume you would.

but i wasn't really talking about people working in a hospital or healthcare.

was more referring to places like grocery stores, banks, retail, etc.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


You’re correct that it’s much less common elsewhere. I would think places like nursing homes, outpatient clinics of various sorts, etc. would have similar requirements. College campuses require vaccinations of various sorts as a condition of admission. Things of that nature. I’m sure there’s a more comprehensive list somewhere online.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80474317
United States
01/14/2022 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
This will prove to be the undoing of any business or employer. They will go broke and lose their best to their competition . BOYCOTTS incoming as well.
TrufSerumX

User ID: 80857619
United States
01/14/2022 10:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Problem is these shots aren't vaccines.

Don't let them gas light you and get away with it.

We had laws on the books for horse theft. Then cars came along.

How ridiculous if some unelected bureaucrat in Washington was to declare "well now 'horse' means 'any method of personal transportation!'"

It wouldn't stand. Because a horse and a car ain't the same damn thing! We had to enact new laws for cars.

Are there laws and statutes and case law allowing for vaccines for schools etc?Sure.

But this ain't one.

That is the talking point and the legal argument that needs to start being made by AGs and like.

Because if we are going to accept as a society that we can retroactively apply meaning to laws and case law written before definitions changed, by changing those definitions today in the present, we effectively upend nearly 500 years of common law principles!!!!!!!

ITS NOT A VACCINE.

"Be Careful When You Follow The Masses... Sometimes the 'M' Is Silent." - TrufSerumX
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79248910
United States
01/14/2022 10:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Companies will back down. The ruling just came out yesterday. Right now they are all scrambling to come out with their new policy, which will not require vaccine. Sad for those who already took it, but life goes on. Live and learn.
Pres. Elect Festus Hoggbottom

User ID: 81479191
United States
01/14/2022 10:22 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
...


You cannot force this… you can try to spin it however you want but mandating an EUA drug is illegal…

The only reason they are doing it is because you people are to stupid and weak to stand up for yourself.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78914227


You clowns don’t get it. I’m saying there is NO LEGAL RECOURSE here in the United States of the type you’re describing. Do you not understand?

I agree with you that it’s wrong and SHOULD be illegal. I’m telling you that it plainly IS legal under established law and precedent for employers to mandate a jab.

Good luck finding a lawyer to represent you. It won’t happen.

thwak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


so they can force employees to take the HPV vaccine? the flu vaccine?

as someone mentioned before with drug testing.... smoking weed or doing drugs willingly and being tested for that doesn't equate to being force to take a medicine/vaccnine against your will.

name ONE drug or medical treatment a business can force their employee to take to stay employed.
 Quoting: 1-2-Follow


Name one drug: literally every health care employer requires measles, polio and smallpox vaccinations.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


Well, that's not a drug.

Last Edited by Festus J. Hoggbottom, III on 01/14/2022 10:23 AM
I did it. I did it on purpose. And I'll do it again.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13475882
United States
01/14/2022 10:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
21 US code of federal regulations:
section 50.23 and 24 it is illegal to coerce anyone into an experimental medical program.
Civil violation of law.

18 US code of federal regulations:
section 2331 and subsection 802
coercing someone to take part in a medical experiment is also domestic terrorism.
This is a felony with 99 year prison term.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81325182
United Kingdom
01/14/2022 10:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Does that not mean that the employers will be culpable of something does go wrong?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75992367
Germany
01/14/2022 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
what the SCOTUS did yesterday is a 3/4 lose for the Americans, it was pure charade of a decision

they decided like the Government can not enact the mandates, but private businesses can still do it, so if you're living in Liberal ruled areas, you're fucked

another point is, that hospitals that get the MEDICARE AND MEDICAID aid, means the Government is refunding 70% of their operating and servicing costs, will also have to mandate it per the SCOTUS ruling, so in essence

the plan is this, on the long run, they'll seek to destroy the small and medium businesses in order then for the Government to have the chance to bail them out, thus if they'll want the money that will save them from bankruptcy, you'll get the funds, but you'll need to take the jabs same as those above mentioned hospitals and the people working in them

it's basically a tool to destroy the Capitalism and usher in Communism, in the end, the agenda is to NATIONALIZE these businesses and operations, with one word, CORPORATIZATION (The result of corporatization is the creation of state-owned corporations (or corporations at other government levels, such as municipally owned corporations) of everything you know and in order to work, do businesses with them, you'll have to take the jabs, see how this works...the plebs always get fucked heh
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75163520
United States
01/14/2022 10:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday. But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement.

[link to www.barrons.com (secure)]

asswipes
 Quoting: 442


I work for a corporation with 12,000 employees. They are finalizing their headquarters move from Los Angeles to Phoenix in 2 months to get away from the bullshit.
StarF

User ID: 77939003
United States
01/14/2022 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Companies will back down. The ruling just came out yesterday. Right now they are all scrambling to come out with their new policy, which will not require vaccine. Sad for those who already took it, but life goes on. Live and learn.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79248910


Does it though?

The experiment achieved self-selection of the most neurotic and hysteric people in society to opt-in against a disease with a 99%+ survival rate.

Followed by the weakest/most leveraged (irresponsible) to be compelled against their interests.

What happens when the actual AE rates are known? What happens when it's obvious some of those are long(er)-term?

Group 1: Goes bat crazy. These are weaponized humans. Forget having a functioning society/economy. Bare shelves are a new normal.

Group 2: Long term liabilities on social programs and a voting block (red > blue conversion)

I don't think life just goes on for those who took or those who didn't.
Star
C MAJOR
User ID: 80541691
United States
01/14/2022 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
these companies will be sued into oblivion once the lawsuites hit ... they will cease to exist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77237285


their share of the trade shall be the lake of fire and like the false prophet which is the vatican harlet that decieved all nations by giving them poisons! SHALL NOT BE FOUND!
1-2-Follow

User ID: 81230252
United States
01/14/2022 10:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday. But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement.

[link to www.barrons.com (secure)]

asswipes
 Quoting: 442


I work for a corporation with 12,000 employees. They are finalizing their headquarters move from Los Angeles to Phoenix in 2 months to get away from the bullshit.
 Quoting: Omicron Prime


wtfpoint
Articles and "news" from liberal media shall now be known as catnip for libtards.

Truth is schilling in the empire of retards.

"Yep but for now we dub you toast guy." - AC520845

*PROCLAIMED PROPHET OF THE DOW* ®

Let me know when the climate STOPS changing, then i'll be worried.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79248910
United States
01/14/2022 10:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Companies will back down. The ruling just came out yesterday. Right now they are all scrambling to come out with their new policy, which will not require vaccine. Sad for those who already took it, but life goes on. Live and learn.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79248910


Does it though?

The experiment achieved self-selection of the most neurotic and hysteric people in society to opt-in against a disease with a 99%+ survival rate.

Followed by the weakest/most leveraged (irresponsible) to be compelled against their interests.

What happens when the actual AE rates are known? What happens when it's obvious some of those are long(er)-term?

Group 1: Goes bat crazy. These are weaponized humans. Forget having a functioning society/economy. Bare shelves are a new normal.

Group 2: Long term liabilities on social programs and a voting block (red > blue conversion)

I don't think life just goes on for those who took or those who didn't.
 Quoting: StarF


Yes, life goes on. We live, we die. The in between is what WE make of it. I’ll continue to enjoy life until the day I die. It’s really not that big of a deal, unless you have nothing to enjoy. I enjoy life, the good and the bad.
5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79204970
United States
01/14/2022 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday. But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement.

[link to www.barrons.com (secure)]

asswipes
 Quoting: 442


I work for a corporation with 12,000 employees. They are finalizing their headquarters move from Los Angeles to Phoenix in 2 months to get away from the bullshit.
 Quoting: Omicron Prime


clappa

lucky
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77702517
United States
01/14/2022 10:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
The Biden administration’s nationwide Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for large private employers is dead, following the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion Thursday. But for many companies and their workers, a jab will still be a job requirement.

[link to www.barrons.com (secure)]

asswipes
 Quoting: 442


Not in Texas

Or Florida

I hope these states make it a CRIMINAL offense to require vaxx and not just a fine
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811858
Canada
01/14/2022 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Those companies will be sued out of existence..

Try it.
 Quoting: Evil Lincoln


Yes, blatant workplace discrimination.
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 80828797
Switzerland
01/14/2022 10:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Problem is these shots aren't vaccines.

Don't let them gas light you and get away with it.

We had laws on the books for horse theft. Then cars came along.

How ridiculous if some unelected bureaucrat in Washington was to declare "well now 'horse' means 'any method of personal transportation!'"

It wouldn't stand. Because a horse and a car ain't the same damn thing! We had to enact new laws for cars.

Are there laws and statutes and case law allowing for vaccines for schools etc?Sure.

But this ain't one.

That is the talking point and the legal argument that needs to start being made by AGs and like.

Because if we are going to accept as a society that we can retroactively apply meaning to laws and case law written before definitions changed, by changing those definitions today in the present, we effectively upend nearly 500 years of common law principles!!!!!!!

ITS NOT A VACCINE.

 Quoting: TrufSerumX


After this, we can't trust any "vaccines".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79248910
United States
01/14/2022 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Problem is these shots aren't vaccines.

Don't let them gas light you and get away with it.

We had laws on the books for horse theft. Then cars came along.

How ridiculous if some unelected bureaucrat in Washington was to declare "well now 'horse' means 'any method of personal transportation!'"

It wouldn't stand. Because a horse and a car ain't the same damn thing! We had to enact new laws for cars.

Are there laws and statutes and case law allowing for vaccines for schools etc?Sure.

But this ain't one.

That is the talking point and the legal argument that needs to start being made by AGs and like.

Because if we are going to accept as a society that we can retroactively apply meaning to laws and case law written before definitions changed, by changing those definitions today in the present, we effectively upend nearly 500 years of common law principles!!!!!!!

ITS NOT A VACCINE.

 Quoting: TrufSerumX


After this, we can't trust any "vaccines".
 Quoting: CK Dexter Haven


Or doctors.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77580045
United States
01/14/2022 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
It will and they will face lawsuits for it.
Sisyphusrock

User ID: 81656341
United States
01/14/2022 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations


Yeah but if terminated due to no vax now with SCOTUS ruling, companies can be sued, class action style.
 Quoting: laughnow12


Wrong
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81039682


How exactly is this wrong .
Me thinks you are missing the implications that can be extrapolated ...
“I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.”
No Need

User ID: 81859751
United States
01/14/2022 10:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
That's when the word Sue stops being a name and becomes a verb.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78693250


You can only sue if the vaccine injures you in some way, because they will have lost legal immunity through OSHA, or if there is something established in state law.

You can also sue if local mandates contradict the state's constitution.

I pray for devastating lawsuits of course, but this is a learning opportunity for those who don't know how the federalist system works just yet
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78914227
01/14/2022 11:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
So private companies can make you drug test even in states that have legalized weed but they can't make you take this so called vaccine?

Seems to me private companies can pretty much set their own rules, let them hang themselves.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74788965


Stop acting like an idiot…

BUSINESS CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT.

They just don’t have liability protection from doing whatever they want..

Business have done illegal practices since the beginning of time…

And time again and again they are caught, brought to justice and sued into oblivion…

Again, for the final time, they are only doing this because you’re not standing up. Because you allow them to do it..

Discrimination is illegal yet we have 1000’s of cases every year that occur…

Either stand up or stop bitching.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78914227


Bingo!

Someone who actually gets it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81107803


You don’t get how the law actually works. That much is clear.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80928359


K
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80483712
United States
01/14/2022 11:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, Some Employers Will Still Require Vaccinations
Comments in this thread are basically all right, and wrong at the same time.

Yes the SCOTUS ruled a stay, however, they pushed it back to the state level, so companies that are situated in liberal states, and have liberal bosses will suffer still. Can they eventually sue, sure but winning case laws will need to be established first.





GLP