Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 934 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 139,027
Pageviews Today: 294,286Threads Today: 114Posts Today: 2,805
05:01 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine

 
Clayton Bigsby
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 81416362
United States
12/06/2021 01:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Moderna batches belong to two main groups - 20A or 21A - the 20A group is much more toxic. Infact all of the batches ptroducing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports - all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A. Most of the batches producing fewer than 1780 ADRs end in 21A.

Within the 20A group there are 4 subgroups J, K, L, M
Within the 21A group there are 6 subgroups A, B, C, D, E, F

In both cases it is found that as the alphabet ascends, then the toxicity decreases in steps.

What this means is - the number of adverse reactions is not random or accidental. Rather it varies with the toxicity of the batch - and different toxic levels have been assigned to different letters of the alphabet -

J & K both very toxic
L more toxic than M
M more toxic than A
A more toxic than B
B more toxic than C
C more toxic than D
D, E, F all about the same toxicity


Tex the Neanderthal

User ID: 79310585
United States
12/08/2021 04:38 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Is this info available for Pfizer?
My Foolish Daydream

User ID: 73398970
United States
12/08/2021 04:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
bump
It's just a bad day, not a bad life. If you run, I will run, until my last breath.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60950644
United States
12/08/2021 08:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
LINK-pls
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 67904014
United States
12/08/2021 08:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Moderna batches belong to two main groups - 20A or 21A - the 20A group is much more toxic. Infact all of the batches ptroducing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports - all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A. Most of the batches producing fewer than 1780 ADRs end in 21A.

Within the 20A group there are 4 subgroups J, K, L, M
Within the 21A group there are 6 subgroups A, B, C, D, E, F

In both cases it is found that as the alphabet ascends, then the toxicity decreases in steps.

What this means is - the number of adverse reactions is not random or accidental. Rather it varies with the toxicity of the batch - and different toxic levels have been assigned to different letters of the alphabet -

J & K both very toxic
L more toxic than M
M more toxic than A
A more toxic than B
B more toxic than C
C more toxic than D
D, E, F all about the same toxicity



 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


Do you have a source for this and more importantly, how were the doses distributed?
Let’s GO

User ID: 79695062
United States
12/08/2021 09:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
bump

For link
Let’s GO

User ID: 79695062
United States
12/08/2021 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Found link.




[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]
Tex the Neanderthal

User ID: 79310585
United States
12/08/2021 01:51 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
For anyone who didn't see the first thread on this topic with more details.

Thread: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78619133
United States
12/08/2021 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Moderna batches belong to two main groups - 20A or 21A - the 20A group is much more toxic. Infact all of the batches ptroducing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports - all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A. Most of the batches producing fewer than 1780 ADRs end in 21A.

Within the 20A group there are 4 subgroups J, K, L, M
Within the 21A group there are 6 subgroups A, B, C, D, E, F

In both cases it is found that as the alphabet ascends, then the toxicity decreases in steps.

What this means is - the number of adverse reactions is not random or accidental. Rather it varies with the toxicity of the batch - and different toxic levels have been assigned to different letters of the alphabet -

J & K both very toxic
L more toxic than M
M more toxic than A
A more toxic than B
B more toxic than C
C more toxic than D
D, E, F all about the same toxicity



 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


Who decides who gets what? Random,computer, age, sex, health, need dead?

Great post op, want info on whether segments of pop. are targetted, thanks!5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78619133
United States
12/08/2021 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
For anyone who didn't see the first thread on this topic with more details.

Thread: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
 Quoting: Tex the Neanderthal

TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Clayton Bigsby
Offer Upgrade


User ID: 78487630
United States
12/01/2021 01:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Would you like to know which batches were the most toxic?
Watch this video if you know your batch number

COVID VACCINE BATCH NUMBERS CODE FOR TOXICITY


**Different Dosages at Different Times**

Some members have suggested that the toxic batches are due to pharma trying out different dosages upon the public. I thought this idea was worthy of investigation, so I did a brief study.

The batches are listed in VAERS in the order in which they were released. I counted the number of adverse reactions for each batch, and present this as the y-axis on a chart that also orders the batches by the time sequence in which they were released (x-axis).

I was looking for any pattern in the variation of toxicity over time.

The resulting chart is shown below.

**The immediate observation is that the toxicity of the batches varies massively over time. NOT ALL BATCHES ARE EQUAL - some are 1000 to 5000 times more toxic than others.**

* A dosage was given with the 1500th batch that generated a sudden and abrupt increase to 2000 x the toxicity of previous batches.
* Then there is a period of cessation until the 3000th batch. This is a gap of 1500 batches. During this period batches become harmless - producing 1 or 2 adverse reactions at most.
* With the 3000th batch, toxicity is again boosted upto 2000 x, and these toxic batches are regularly interspersed with harmless batches.
* Around about the 4500th batch they start using batches of higher toxicity - upto 4000 x, and reduce the number of batches of lower toxicity.
* About the 11,000th batch the toxicity is reduced to 0-500 x
* Then around the 12,000th batch, 7 batches are released all in the 1000x - 2000x range - followed soon after by an abrupt change back to the 0-500x range.
* There then follows a complete cessation of toxic batches from the 13,000th batch until the 16,000th batch. This is a gap of 3000 batches. During this period, all the batches become harmless again - the majority producing just 1 or 2 adverse reactions per batch.

During this time they were probably analysing the results.
* Then from the 16,000th batch until the 21,000th batch they stop production of lower toxicity batches, and instead produce batches with a higher toxicity 1000-3000 x
* Then with the 18,000th batch, they stop production of batches in the 1000-2000x range, and instead produce batches of a higher toxicity in the 2000x -3000x range.

Then they step down the toxicity in 3 steps.
* At the 19300th batch they drop the toxicity to 1500-2500x
* Then at the 20,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 1000-2000x
* Then at the 21,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 0-1500x
* It looks as if they stopped using the toxic batches around 21882nd batch until present (28330th batch).

They may of-course be planning to resume. They now have an idea of the effects of different dosages/toxicities.

They are collating.

**The large variations in the toxicity of the batches suggests that either the concentration or the ingredients were varied.**

The **systematic steps** displayed in the chart, lend some credence to the idea that Pharma is adjusting the dosages with the entire population, and observing the effects. This is evidenced by
1. **abrupt, 1000-fold changes in toxicity**
1. **abrupt cessation of toxic batches and resuming of harmless ones **
1. **step-wise changes in toxicity**

2021 is the year that they experimented.

They now know what works and what does not work for their purposes. They have tested the lethal limits.

Next year the application begins.

This is my interpretation of the distribution of the data.





GLP